Class Action Article

  • File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit: Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Talcum Powder Fallopian Tube Cancer Lawsuits Baby  Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Filed If you or a loved one used talcum powder products and were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, or fallopian tube can...

Class Action News

Drug Class Actions

  • Taxotere Lawyers for Permanent Hair Loss: Taxotere Baldness Lawyers For  Permanent Hair Loss Lawsuits Have you received Taxotere for breast cancer? Taxotere can result in hair loss or baldness  that is permanent. Taxotere  is a chemotherapy drug used for the treatment of breas...

Medical Device Lawsuits

  • Zimmer Hip Replacement Lawyers: Network Zimmer Hip Replacement  Lawyer Win $2 Million Against Zimmer Hip Replacement Do You Have A Faulty Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prothesis With Connective Technology and Cobalt Chromium Head? Do You Have Have Metallosis or Chromium Cobalt T...

Gynemesh Transvaginal Mesh Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Gynemesh Class Action Lawyers are filing lawsuits against the manufacturers of the Gynemesh transvsagina mesh Implant in 3, 4, 5 and 6 year product liability statute states.

Our Gynemesh Class Action  Lawyers Are Accepting Transvaginal mesh Lawsuits

For Gynemesh Vaginal Mesh Surgically Implanted In The Following 3, 4, 5 and 6 year product liability statute states.

 D.C, Florida, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska,  New Hampshire, New Mexico,  North Carolina,  Rhode Island, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

   Ethicon Gynecare Prolift Pelvic Mesh Lawsuits For Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh

    Ethicon Gynecare Prosima Pelvic Mesh
    Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh
    Ethicon Prolene Mesh
    Ethicon Gynecare TVT Sling

An Ethicon Gynemesh  vaginal mesh or bladder sling lawsuits are being filed  for women who have experienced complications.

Gynemesh Complications Include

  •     Infection
  •     Erosion of the Mesh
  •     Urinary Problems
  •     Digestive problems
  •     Pelvic Pain
  •     Re Prolapse
  •     Injury to Nearby Organs
  •     Difficulty during intimacy

The FDA has received reports of problems with Ethicon Gynemesh vaginal mesh implants

Overview Of  Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh

Gynecare Gynemesh was first introduced in October 2002. Gynemesh is also called the Gynecare GynemeshPS, nonabsorbable Prolene Soft Mesh, for vaginal wall prolapse surgical treatment.

What Is Ethicon Gynemesh?

Ethicon Gynemesh is porous, which allows surrounding tissues to grow into and incorporate the material as part of the body, which can create severe complications. If you are a victim of a faulty Gynemesh Vaginal Mesh

Speak To A Gynemesh Lawsuit Attorney Today

Class Action Lawyer Network Lawyers Filing TRESemme Naturals Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

TRESemmé Naturals” Shampoos and Conditioners Class Action Lawsuit  Underway

Class Action Lawyer Network  seeking California residents interested in joining the TRESemme Naturals class action

Class Action Lawyer Network Lawyers Filing Tresemme Naturals Lawsuits

In August 2013, a class action lawsuit was filed against Unilever United States, Inc. for allegedly falsely advertising the “TRESemmé Naturals” shampoos and conditioners as “natural” when the products actually contain synthetic ingredients. (Cohen et al. v. Unilever United States, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-05162, D. NJ.).

Class Action Lawyers  Are Investigating Representations  Made by Unilever

Class Action Lawyers  are investigating representations being made by Unilever United States, Inc. concerning the "TRESemme Naturals" line of shampoos and conditioners.  The Naturals line is marketed and advertised with a campaign that is centered around the representation that these products are "Natural."  These advertisements may be misleading to consumers because the Naturals line contains numerous synthetic ingredients, including a chemical known to release formaldehyde, that are not "Natural."  Unilever also claims you will have 10x stronger hair after just one use of the shampoo or conditioner, and does not appear to have research that can substantiate this claim. 

Tresemme Naturals, Not So Natural After All

Despite the 'natural' label on some TRESemme products, they actually contain a long list of unnatural ingredients, the TRESemme lawsuit claims. According to the class action lawsuit, the products contain allegedly unnatural ingredients, including ammonium laureth sulfate, DMDM hydantoin and dipropylene glycol. Cohen accuses Unilever of engaging in false and misleading advertising, with the knowledge that consumers would willingly pay a premium for products they believe to be natural.

If you are interested in joining this class action call Class Action lawyer Network today.

Chemical Toxins Leach Vs Dupont Class Action Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Chemical Toxins Leach Vs Dupont Class Action Lawyers

Patients diagnosed with kidney cancer, testicular cancer, ulcerative colitis and/or thyroid disease who are members of the Leach v. Dupont class.  Leach class definition: a person who drank contaminated water for at least one year prior to December 3, 2004 from one of six named water districts, or specified private drinking water wells contaminated with C-8.  The affected water districts are:

Patients diagnosed with kidney cancer, testicular cancer, ulcerative colitis and/or thyroid disease who are members of the Leach v. Dupont class.  Leach class definition: a person who drank contaminated water for at least one year prior to December 3, 2004 from one of six named water districts, or specified private drinking water wells contaminated with C-8.  The affected water districts are (1) Little Hocking, Ohion (2) Lubeck Public Service District, West Virginia (3) City of Belpre, Ohio (4)  Tuppers Plains, Ohio (5) Mason County Public Service District, West Virginia (6) Village of Pomeroy, Ohio.

Chemical exposure lawyer Little Hocking,

Chemical exposure lawyer Lubeck Public Service District,

Chemical exposure lawyer Belpre,

Chemical exposure lawyer Tuppers Plains,

Chemical exposure lawyer Mason County Public Service District,

Chemical exposure lawyer West Virginia ,

Chemical exposure lawyer Village of Pomeroy

It does not matter where class member now reside, so long as they lived in one of the contaminated areas and drank the water at least one year effective December 3, 2004.

Pradaxa Lawsuits Update, Pradaxa Lawyers Filing Pradaxa Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Pradaxa Lawsuit  News and Updates

The Pradaxa lawsuits are moving forward. The Pradaxa lawyers advise all victims and families of  extensive bleeding from Pradaxa to file their Pradaxa lawsuit by callingour Pradaxa hotline rigjht away. The Pradaxa lawsuits are being filed in MDL 2385 – Pradaxa (Dabigatran Etexilate) Products Liability Litigation. Over  650 lawsuits have been filed in the  Pradaxa MDL (No. 2385, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois).

Pradaxa is an anticoagulant medication prescribed to people with  heart problems. But, Pradaxa has no antidote and extensive bleeding or death has been the result in many instances.Pradaxa causes life-threatening internal bleeding.

Side effects of Pradaxa may include:

  •     Brain hemorrhage
  •     Digestive system bleeding
  •     Uncontolled internal bleeding

The Pradaxa lawsuits have been mounting up  quickly. Many victims are seniors who fall and end up with a brain bleed internal bleeding or bleeding that does not stop and cannot be controlled by any other medication. Anyone who cares for or has a love do one who is on Pradaxa must observe them carefully.

Signs Of Externsive Bleeding

  •     a sudden severe headache
  •     seizures with no previous history of seizures
  •     weakness in an arm or leg
  •     nausea or vomiting
  •     decreased alertness; lethargy
  •     changes in vision
  •     tingling or numbness
  •     difficulty speaking or understanding speech
  •     difficulty swallowing
  •     difficulty writing or reading
  •     loss of fine motor skills, such as hand tremors
  •     loss of coordination
  •     loss of balance
  •     an abnormal sense of taste
  •     loss of consciousness

Extensive Bleeding From Pradaxa can be fatal. If you have lost a loved one due to extensive bleeding from Pradaxa call for a Pradaxa lawyer today.

Nationwide Bladder Sling Lawyer Outreach, Bladder Sling Lawsuits Being Filed

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Bladder Sling Lawyers, Bladder Sling Lawyers Filing Nationwide Bladder Sling Lawsuits

The bladder sling lawyers of Class Action Lawyer Network are accepting all nationwide bladder sling lawsuits. Lawsuits are being filed as a part of the consolidated MDL'S in West Virginia.

What Is A Bladder Sling?

Bladder slings are used to treat urinary incontinence by implanting  a sling around the urethra. The bladder sling is attached to the abdominal wall or pelvic bone. The bladder sling is a vaginal mesh device, and has all the complications for which TVT lawsuits are being filed.

Bladder Sling Complications

Erosion thru the vaginal wall 

Erosion into the bladder,

Pain during sexual intercourse,

Bleeding,

Infection,

Perforation of bladder, colon,

Urinary incontinence

Problems voiding.

Our bladder sling lawyers are  filing bladder sling lawsuits for  women. You must file a bladder sling lawsuit quickly, as the statute of limitations is running very close in many states.

 The manufacturers are:

    Bard Avaulta Support System MDL No. 2187

    AMS Elevate Prolapse Repair System MDL No. 2325

    AMS Apogee Vault Suspension System

    AMS Perigee System

    AMS Monarc Sling System

    AMS Sparc Sling System

    Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh MDL No. 2327

    Ethicon Gynecare Prolene Soft Mesh

    Ethicon Gynecare Prolift Pelvic Floor Repair System

    Ethicon Gynecare TVT Transvaginal Sling

    Boston Scientific Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair Kit MDL No.2326

    Boston Scientific Uphold Vaginal Support System

Vaginal Mesh Multi District Lawsuit List Consolidated Under Judge Goodwin in West Virginia

    MDL – 2325, IN RE: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL No. 2187 | In RE: CR Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2326 IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2327 IN RE: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
 

Our experienced bladder sling lawyes ready to file bladder sling lawsuits  slings problem lawsuits.  Vaginal mesh products have many different names. Do not assume your bladder sling is not covered in the TVT lawsuits  until you speak to one of our bladder sling  lawyers. Many states have a  statue of limitations issue. Time is of the essence. Call our nationwide bladder sling lawyers today.

Did You Take Yaz Or Yasmin? Settlements For Yaz Lawsuits For Bloodclots

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Yaz, Yasmin Lawsuit  Multidistrict Litigation


MDL 2100 – Yasmin and YAZ (Drospirenone) Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, multidistrict litigation (MDL) in Illinois federal court.


Yaz lawyers are accepting Yaz lawsuits for blood clot related injuries:

  • Pulmonary Embolism
  • Blood Clots
  • Stokes
  • Deep Vein Thrombosis

Bayer is facing thousands of Yaz and Yasmin lawsuits involving blood clot related injuries.

Yaz Blood Clot Settlements

According to Bayer’s 2nd Quarter 2013 Statement, Bayer  haa agreed to pay more than $1.4 billion to resolve an estimated 6,700 lawsuits from women  who suffered a:
    Heart attack or Stroke from Yaz or Yasmin
    Pulmonary Embolism from Yaz or Yasmin
    Deep Vein Thrombosis from Yaz or Yasmin

There are still  more than 5,000 additional claims involving a thrombosis blood clot related injury.  Bayer is continuing negotiating on a case-by-case basis, after complete documentation and presentation of the claim by an attorney. It is not too late to file your Yaz blood clot lawsuit. Our Yaz lawyers are still  continuing to review and evaluate potential claims from women who suffered a pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, heart attack, stroke or other blood clot injury while using Yaz, Yasmin or Ocella.

If you or a loved one has been injured by Yaz or a loved one has died from a Yaz related injury call us for a Yaz lawyer today.
 

Women With Dow Corning Breast Implants Are Still Waiting AS Vaginal Mesh Bellwether Trials Begin

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

The Dow Corning Breast Implant Class Action was the largest class action in history effecting women until the vaginal mesh. Now women are watching the Bellwether trials hoping for justice as women with Dow Corning Breast Implants are still waiting.

Claimants in Dow Corning Breast Implant Lawsuit Waiting

As one woman says:

We have all been waiting for our disbursement from the Court that was awarded us because of our problems with the Dow Corning Breast Implant Lawsuit. This award was made over 20 years ago. Please feel free to use this letter in your pursuit of your share of the proceeds from this lawsuit. I am interested in getting this settled and getting paid, and I know you are, also.

Will women destroyed by the vaginal mesh have the same problems?

 

March 4, 2013

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

This letter is to all claimants under the Dow Corning Breast Implant Suit.

We have been told that an oral argument is being made before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit as to whether or not Dow Corning can claim a credit for interest earned on the Initial Payment that was made before the Effective Date of the Plan. It was successfully argued by the CAC that the bankruptcy settlement provided that the claimants, not Dow Corning, would get the benefit of the interest earned on the Initial Payment.

The hearing went well and the Court took the Issue under advisement. We expect a ruling to come sometime in 2013. So far there are not any updates on this ruling.

The Courts need to realize that Dow has been making appeals on this case for too many years. Dow Corning has let it be known that there is plenty of money in its Settlement Fund to pay the current claimants and those who may claim in the future, but they continually object to actually making these payments, hoping to be able to keep any and all interest due on these payments. It has been argued that the claimants are to get the interest and this ruling is what the claimants are waiting on SO THAT THEY CAN FINALLY GET PAID.

As one of the claimants, I feel that after almost 20 years of trying to collect from Dow Corning, I should be the one to benefit from the additional interest earned by the Settlement Fund, not Dow Corning or their attorneys. The accrued interest aside, I want to be paid now because of the financial burden imposed on myself and the thousands of other claimants over the years. Personally, I am in danger of losing my home and car. It is hard for me to pay for medicine and food. Even though food stamps are available, many states are reducing the amounts paid out. My attorney surely deserves his reward after all the years of providing me with support and advice.

These premium payments could be a welcome injection into the critical financial situation in which most of the country finds itself. These women claimants have had to put off purchases that are normally made each year, such as insurance, new clothes, new vehicles to replace not-so-reliable old ones, and other items that many persons take for granted.

Women have really been taken advantage of in so many ways – almost comparable to being raped. They have suffered mentally, financially and physically. Time moves very slowly when you think you have been forgotten and the Courtroom seem to go on and on. I will be 78 years old in September of 2011. I have waited 20 years for the premium payments since I first applied as a claimant. I doubt I can wait another 20 years.

How long can Dow Corning use the Courts to avoid paying these poor women?

As we look at the past for women whose lives were destroyed by Dow Corning Breast Implants we can only wonder what the future holds for 1000's of vaginal mesh victims. Our vaginal mesh lawyers are here to help you. Our Breast Implant lawyers are here to help you. We are lawyers helping woman.

Vaginal Mesh Bellwether Trials Updated

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class MDL Class Action News, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Medical Device Lawsuits, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Get Your  Mesh lawsuit Attorney Today

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Updates

The vaginal mesh Class action ( multi-distict litigation ) may very well be the largest since the Dow Corning Breast Implant Class Action. The bellwether trials are progressing. Below are the updated reports. A bellwether trial sets the tone of expectation for a juries reaction to injuries, So far the juries have spoken in favor of the victims.

Bard Bellwether Trial, The First of Four Bellwether Trials

A jury  found C.R. Bard iiable for injuries and  must pay $2 million to a woman who sued saying she suffered injuries from the company’s vaginal-mesh implant, a jury found. Today’s jury verdict in Charleston, West Virginia, was the first in a federal court out of more than 5,000 claims over the devices. Jurors deliberated about 12 hours over two days before finding Murray Hill-based Bard liable for injuries that Donna Cisson blamed on its Avaulta line of devices. The jury awarded $250,000 in compensatory damages for Cisson’s injuries plus $1.75 million in punitive damages.

Boston Scientific Next

The first Boston Scientific  round of trials will begin on February 11, 2014, and will involve lawsuits filed over injuries  related to the use of the Pinnacle mesh products.
The second round will start on June 17, 2014, and will involve cases brought against Obtryx pelvic mesh. (In re: Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2326)

Boston Scientific is just one of several manufacturers involved in litigations for surgical mesh lawsuits established in the Southern District of West Virginia.

Johnson and Johnson Trial Updates

A jury in Atlantic City ordered Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon unit to pay $11.1 million to a woman who suffered severe injuries from its vaginal mesh device.

Vaginal Mesh Overview

C.R. Bard’s products include:

Bard Pelvitex
Bard Pelvisoft
Bard Pelvilace or Pelvicol
Bard Utrtex
Bard Uretex TO
Bard Uretex TOO2
Bard Uretex TOO3

Bard Align
Avaulta Plus™
Avaulta Solo™
BioSynthetic Support System
Faslata® Allograft
Synthetic Support System

Coloplast Vaginal Mesh Products

    Novasilk Synthetic Flat Mesh
    Restorelle Smartmesh
    Exair Mesh

  
Johnson & Johnson products include:

Gynecare Prosima
Gynecare TVT Exact
Gynecare TVT Abbrevo
Gynecare TVT Retropubic System
Gynecare TVT
Gynecare TVT Obturator
Gynecare TVT Secur
Gynecare Gynemesh PS
Gynecare Prolift
Gynecare Prolift+M

Cook Medical Surgical Products

    Cook Medical Surgical
    Surgisis Biodesign Tension-Free Urethral Sling,
    Surgisis Biodesign
    Anterior Pelvic Floor Graft,
    Surgisis Biodesign Posterior Pelvic Floor Graft,
    Cook Urological Stratasis

AMS’s products include:

AMS MiniArc Precise Single-Incision Sling
AMS MiniArc Single Incision Sling
AMS Monarc Subfascial Hammock
AMS In-Fast Ultra Transvaginal Sling
AMS BioArc
AMS Sparc Self-Fixating Sling System
AMS Elevate
AMS Perigree
AMS Apogee
  
Boston Scientific products include:

Boston Scientific Arise
Boston Scientific Pinnacle
Boston Scientific Advantage Fit
Boston Scientific Lynx
Boston Scientific Obtryx
Boston Scientific Prefyx PPS
Boston Scientific Solyx

Vaginal Mesh Multi District Lawsuit List Consolidated Under Judge Goodwin in West Virginia

    MDL – 2325, IN RE: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL No. 2187 | In RE: CR Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2326 IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2327 IN RE: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2387 IN RE: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation
    Cook Medical Surgical will be the 5th MDL

Vaginal Mesh Bellwether Trials

Vaginal Mesh bellwether trials are selected to determine how similar vaginal mesh  lawsuits might turn out for the victims.  It’s a chance to see how juries will respond to the injury  claims when there are a large number of lawsuits with similar complaints. This  is very important to our vaginal mesh  lawyers.

 

IVC Filter Lawsuits, IVC Filter Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Bard Retrievable IVC Filter Lawsuits

Bard IVC filter lawyers are accepting cases for perforation, migration, and pulmonary Embolism. A fractured IVC filter can also perforate other organs, including the heart and lungs.


IVC Filter Migration

When a retrievable IVC filter fractures and migrates, you can experience severe pain, bleeding, further embolus, and other life-threatening complications.

  • C.R. Bard’s Recovery IVC Filter 
  • G2 IVC Filter
  • Braun Tempofilter IVC filter (retrievable)
  • Bard G2x IVC (retrievable, unlimited indwell time)
  • Bard G2 (retrievable)
  • Cook Günther Tulip (retrievable)
  • Cook Celect (retrievable)
  • Cordis OptEase IVC filter (retrievable, 23 day indwell time)
  • ALN IVC filter (retrievable)
  • Rex Medical Option IVC filter (retrievable)

What Are IVC Filters?

IVC filters are placed in individuals who have deep vein thrombosis in their legs to prevent blood clots that break off from traveling to the heart, lungs and brain. 

The Bard's Recovery IVC Filter and G2 IVC Filter System were approved for sale via the U.S. Food & Drug Administration's (FDA) 510(k) protocols.   C. R. Bard removed the Recovery IVC from the market in 2005, but it is believed that there are still devices implanted in people.  The G2, which was the replacement  for the Recovery, is still being used.

What Ia The Concerns?

Retrievable IVC filter implants have been fracturing and migrating. Usually the fractured portions of the device migrate to the heart and lungs. Fragments of IVC filters can also migrate to other organs. The metal fragments from a retrievable IVC filter have migrated to   the heart, lungs or another organ. The resulting   injury is bleeding, severe pain, and further embolism.

In August 2010, the FDA issued an advisory in response to the noted adverse incident reports. 

    Filter Migration (328 reports)
    Embolization (146 reports)
    IVC Peforations (70 reports)
    Filter Fracture  (56 reports)

Bard IVC Filter Lawsuits

If you or a loved one has been injured by one of these defective medical devices, our Bard IVC Filter System defective product  lawyers want to hear from you today.

Bard Recovery IVC Filter and G2 IVC Filter System Failure Symptoms

  • Chest pain
  • Shortness of breath.

Be Alerted That Failure Of This Implant Can Lead To Severe Injury

  •     Death
  •     Constant severe pain in the heart,
  •     Pain in the chest
  •     Pulmonary embolism
  •     Respiratory failure
  •     Hemorrhage
  •     Perforation of tissue, vessels and organs

 

Our Bard IVC Filter System injury lawyers are ready to  make sure that  victims of these defective devices are fully compensated for their injuries.

Pay Day Loan Class Action, Pay Day Loan Default Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Pay day loans in Florida are up and Pay Day Loan companies are attracting review for their practices of charging huge interest rates for out Florida residents who just cannot pay them on time.  The Florida Supreme Court  is looking at a  payday loan class-action lawsuit suit.

Pay Day Loan Class Action Lawsuits

By Regan McCarthy

The Florida Supreme Court is considering whether a group seeking a class-action lawsuit against a check-advance company should be allowed to move forward with the case. Regan McCarthy reports The company argues the individuals signed contracts waiving their rights to class-action suits.

When Wendy Betts received a payday loan from McKenzie Check Advance she signed a contract waiving the right to file a class-action suit. Now she wants to bring a suit against the company, but she can’t find a lawyer willing to take her case individually, meaning her only option is to try for a class action suit, despite the contact she’d signed. Lawyers stand to make a lot more money through class action suits, than through individual cases, which generally are small claims wrapped up in complex issues. Paul Bland is the lawyer representing Betts and other members of a group hoping to sue the company together. Bland, says the waivers banning the class action suit should be thrown out because they’re keeping the people from being able to move forward with a case.

“If this arbitration clause had said, you have to go to Alaska to bring claims, that would be unenforceable. If the arbitration clause had said that the filing fees for the arbitrator would be a million dollars, there’s no doubt that that would be unenforceable.  And  t was a trial court’s finding that there was essentially no reasonable avenue other than a class action.”

But the company’s lawyer Jamie Bianchi  says the issue is not about whether class action suits are good or bad, but about federal policy.

“There’s a federal goal of promoting arbitrations and we’re going to, as a policy the United States is going to follow it.”

And Justice Barbara Pariente says the state court will have to follow the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling, whether the justices think it’s right or wrong.

“We’re here with the hand we’re dealt, which is in this case, the U.S. Supreme court and all the decisions after that.”

But, Pariente says she’s not certain the U.S. Supreme Court ruling takes into account whether there are other viable options for citizens blocked from class action suits. The court did not indicate when they expect to rule on the case.

Florida Pay Day Loan Laws

 Under Florida law, payday lenders cannot seek to have a borrower prosecuted for bouncing a check given as security for a loan, so if the creditor is threatening to have you charged with "theft by check" it is almost certainly lying in an attempt to frighten you.

Although payday loans are legal in Florida, the amount of interest and other fees they can charge to consumers are fairly strictly regulated by state law.

Under Florida law, the payday lender may be required to work out a repayment plan with you at a reasonable interest rate.