Class Action Article

  • Physiomesh Hernia Mesh Lawyers: Physiomesh Hernia Mesh lawyers are filing Hernia Mesh lawsuits for your failed Physiomesh used to repair your hernia. Ethicon voluntarily withdrew the Physiomesh from the  market in May of 2016  after independent studies revealed high rates...

Class Action News

  • Stryker Femoral Heads Hip Replacement Lawyers: Stryker V40 Taper Hip Replacement Lawyers Stryker Hip Replacement Lawyers Hip Implant lawyers are filing hip replacement lawsuits for V40 Femoral head failure in the Stryker Hip Implant. In August 2016, Stryker contacted implanting physic...

Drug Class Actions

  • Taxotere Lawyers for Permanent Hair Loss: Taxotere Baldness Lawyers For  Permanent Hair Loss Lawsuits Have you received Taxotere for breast cancer? Taxotere can result in hair loss or baldness  that is permanent. Taxotere  is a chemotherapy drug used for the treatment of breas...

Medical Device Lawsuits

  • File An IVC Filter Lawsuit: Our IVC Filter lawyers are filing IVC Filter lawsuits for injury and Death from a fractured migrating IVC Filter part. The IVC Filters, also known as blood clot filters, Blood Clot Capture Filters and Inferior Vena Cava Filters, are implant...

Mesothelioma Lawyers, Lung Cancer From Asbestos

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Asbestos, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class MDL Class Action News, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Drug Lawsuits, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Louisiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Tennessee Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Toxic Substances, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Class Action Lawyer Network has launched a mesothelioma helpline for victims of asbestos related cancer and their families, The helpline is run by a medical social worker who will offer support and connect you to a mesothelioma lawyer.

What is Asbestos?
Asbestos is a group of minerals that occur naturally in the environment and asbestos has been  used in many industries. As a worker If asbestos fibers are breathed in,  you can get asbestosis or  a scarring of the lung tissue resulting in mesothelioma and lung cancer.

There are two  types of asbestos:

  • chrysotile asbestos
  • amphibole asbestos

Our mesothelioma lawyers  are here for  Asbestos victims and their families. Our Mesothelioma helpline  Asbestos attorneys and medical social worker understand how difficut it is the watch your loved one deteriorate from this disease and feel helpless.

This dangerous lung cancer causing substance can be found in many work environments. if your loved one has worked in an asbestos work environment and has fallen vitim to mesotelioma we can help.

Workers inhaling large amounts of asbestos can get:

  •     Asbestosis
  •     scarring of the lungs
  •     Pleural plaques
  •     Pleural effusions
  •     fluid buildup between lungs and chest cavity
  •     Pleural thickening

Workers with a high risk of developing mesothelioma were exposed to asbestos at work or through large quantities of environmental contact.

Millions of workers since the 1940s have been exposed to asbestos. Those at risk for asbestos-related illnesses worked in the following industries:

  •     Shipbuilding
  •     Mining and milling
  •     Maritime industry
  •     steel mills
  •     Automobile
  •     Asbestos textile manufacturing
  •     Construction and building
  •     Drywall or asbestos removal
  •     First responders to burning buildings or buildings with asbestos exposed the fumes

 

Symptoms of Asbestos related lung cancer

  •     Breathlessness or shortness of breath
  •     A cough that won't go away
  •     Coughing up blood
  •     Wheezing or hoarseness
  •     Fatigue or anemia
  •     Trouble swallowing
  •     Pain or tightening in the chest
  •     Swelling of the neck or face
  •     Weight loss
  •     Loss of appetite

Asbestos and Asbestosis

 For people with severe exposure to asbestos, three of the primary causes of death are: scarring of the lungs,asbestosis, lung cancer and  mesothelioma.
While mesothelioma is the most well known illness caused by exposure to asbestos, it is not the only one. Another significant illness caused by asbestos is asbestosis.

If you or a loved one has toxic exposure due to asbestos resulting in mesothelioma contact our mesothelipoma helpline today.

  

Vaginal Mesh Lawyers Expanded Coverage Area, Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News, Medical Device Lawsuits

The wave of Vaginal mesh lawsuits is picking up as more women realize it is not in their heads. Multi District Litigation lawyers are gearing up as ther proceedings for the vaginal mesh lawsuits begin. Tne vaginal mesh has caused thousands of women pain anguish and destroyed lives and marriages.

This is a call to all women with a failed vaginal mesh to locate a doctor who understands the problem rigt away. This shaould be a urogynecologist. You will need to prove inury from the transvaginal mesh or baldder sling to file your lawsuit. Yes, we know it is from the mesh and not in your head but, a medical report needs to back you up. This is the hard part.

You must file your vaginal mesh ;awsuit if you have not done so already. The stautes in many states are running very close. We do not want you to be left out.

Alert: File Your Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Today

Contact our 24hr hotline for victims of  the vaginal mesh

 

Menigitus Outbreak From Recalled Steroid Medication Reaches 9 States

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

The outbreaks of Menigitus from a compounding pharmacy in Massachusetts has now reached 9 states and 91 victims according to the Wall Street Journel. See article below:

    HEALTH INDUSTRY
    Updated October 7, 2012, 8:31 p.m. ET

Meningitis Cases Rise Amid Hunt for Victims

 

By TIMOTHY W. MARTIN, THOMAS M. BURTON, BETSY MCKAYand JENNIFER LEVITZ

The number of people sickened with fungal meningitis from tainted epidural steroid injections has now risen to 91 in nine states, including seven deaths, federal officials said Sunday, as investigators try to home in on the precise source of contamination at a compounding pharmacy tied to the widespread outbreak.

Investigators from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and state officials are probing the Framingham, Mass., facility where the New England Compounding Center made the 17,676 potentially tainted steroid injections, which were then shipped to 75 clinics in 23 states, according to federal and state officials.

A Centers for Disease Control and Prevention spokesman said it isn't possible to know how many cases there will be. The CDC and state health officials scrambled last week and over the weekend to track down patients who received the shots to see if they had been sick and to warn them to watch for possible symptoms.

The numbers of cases are rising sharply now not necessarily because people are continuing to get sick, but because investigators are pinpointing more illnesses among those who already received the injections of methylprednisolone acetate for relief of back and neck pain.

The injections were given between July and September. So far, those who have been infected developed symptoms between one and four weeks after receiving their injections.

"There's no evidence that new infections are occurring at a more rapid rate," said John Jernigan, medical epidemiologist at the CDC who is involved in the investigation.

It is too early to know how many people ultimately will be affected. Federal and state investigators must determine how many people received potentially contaminated injections, then track down each one. They must then confirm that those who have subsequently become ill actually had fungal meningitis and not another disease. There are "too many variables to speculate on the number of possible cases," said a CDC spokesman.

The compounding pharmacy that produced the injections in question issued a recall Saturday of all products made at its compounding center. "This action is being taken out of an abundance of caution due to the potential risk of contamination," the New England Compounding Center said in a statement. The company has said it is cooperating with investigators. It had no further comment Sunday.

The FDA had already advised medical professionals last week not to use NECC-made products.

Meningitis is a potentially deadly inflammation of the brain or central nervous system. It is usually caused by viruses or bacteria, but can also be brought on by fungi. The two fungi found thus far in some patients—known as aspergillus and exserohilum—are commonly found in the air and soil.

The fungal form of meningitis is particularly difficult to diagnose because the symptoms can be vague and mild initially, including fever, headache, nausea and stiffness of the neck, according to the CDC. People with fungal meningitis can also experience dizziness and confusion. Several of the patients in the current outbreak have had strokes.

Most of the people who have been sickened had normal immune systems, Dr. Jernigan said, meaning they weren't at particular risk of infections. While the investigation into how patients became infected is ongoing, there is some evidence to suggest that the fungi in the medication penetrated the lining protecting the central nervous system after being injected epidurally, Dr. Jernigan said.

While the fungi aren't harmful in the environment, they can become deadly when they flourish in a medication and are then injected directly into a part of the body that should not have germs, Dr. Jernigan said.

One possible victim, 56-year-old Tennessee resident Diana Reed, died Wednesday; she got meningitis after receiving steroid injections, says a lawyer for her family. She had received the injections at a facility that has since been closed because of a meningitis outbreak, according to its Web site.

Ms. Reed underwent an autopsy; the lawyer said he didn't yet know the results.

The outbreak has drawn renewed attention to the little-regulated world of compounding pharmacies. The FDA is hampered by federal law and conflicting federal court decisions over its authority to regulate compounding pharmacies. Current and former senior FDA officials said the agency has sought greater authority over the past decade, but so far has been stymied.

Government officials say the FDA is especially concerned about large compounding pharmacies that send out large amounts of drugs across the country—as opposed to a small pharmacy that may compound a medication three or four times a year.

In particular, the agency hasn't been able to take the normal steps it would take to ensure the safety of a drug produced at a compounding pharmacy. That includes requiring and evaluating clinical trials, and inspection of manufacturing facilities.

Attempts in the past by the agency to regulate more strenuously have been challenged in court.

Chevron Toxic Exposure Victims, Toxic Exposure Lawyers File Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

New potential class action against Chevron due to toxic exposure from a Chevron plant fire. Toxic exposure lawyers filing lawsuits for injury from toxic exposure. See story below:

BAAQMD Finds 23 'Potentially Toxic Pollutants' in Air Around Chevron Fire, Says 'Well Under Exposure Levels'
August 7, 2012, 8:18 pm • Posted by Jon Brooks
 

Statement from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District on air quality samples the agency took around the Richmond fire:

    The Air District had inspectors at the scene of the August 6 Chevron fire, collecting air quality samples from the surrounding area. These were sent to the Air District’s lab at 6 a.m. this morning, and the results came in this afternoon.

    The results of our lab analysis of air samples from the Chevron fire show levels of these potentially toxic pollutants to be well under their reference exposure levels or RELs, and not a significant health concern. These concentrations were similar to the “background” levels measured throughout the Bay Area by our monitoring network.

    The Air District lab tested these air quality samples for a group of 23 compounds, most of which have been identified by the state of California as Toxic Air Contaminants. The Air District regularly tests and measures amounts of these compounds through its air monitoring network. These pollutants are organic compounds typically found in petroleum products.

    The Air District also performed an additional analysis to identify and estimate concentrations of any other pollutants that might show up in significant amounts.

    Reference Exposure Levels, or RELS, were developed by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment as public health measurements based on epidemiological evidence and sensitive populations. RELS are set at levels that could impact sensitive populations – children, the elderly, or those with pre-existing health issues or respiratory conditions.

    Local air quality monitors also showed near normal concentrations of air pollution from the fire, with pollution levels significantly below federal health standards. Weather conditions were favorable at the time of the incident – surface winds were light and heat pushed the smoke upwards where stronger winds aloft helped to disperse it.

    As part of the investigation, the Air District has reviewed air quality monitoring data from monitors at the Chevron facility. Chevron’s findings were consistent with the Air District’s.

DePuyHip Replacement Lawsuits Progress, Hip Replacement Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class MDL Class Action News, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Hawaii Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Louisiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Tennessee Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

The DePuy metal on metal hip replacement is currently in the ligation process. The DePuy is a part of a long line of metal on metal hip recalls, the most recent being the Stryker metal component hip replacements. As the trials progress executives will be questioned as to knowledge of the potential failure of these devices.

Executives that will be questioned  include David Floyd, former president of DePuy at the time of the 2010 recall; Tom Camino, worldwide hip development director; and Rodrigo Diaz, manager of clinical research. Additional executives include the director of marketing, manager of development, director of biostatistics and data management, and member of the research and development team.

The DePuy is a part of a massive multi distrct litigation effecting 1000's of people with a hip implant that failed. Most of them will require additional surgeries with rehabilitation. The problem appears to be that these revision surgeries are not always working. Many people, mostly seniors, have been severely debilitated by these failed hips and their quality of life will never be the same again. Additional problems include metal on metal chromium and cobalt toxicity.

The most recent updates report that  Judge Brian R. Martinotti of Bergen County Superior Court in New Jersey issued an order setting September 9, 2013 and October 21, 2013 as the dates for the first two ASR bellwether trials to be held in the state’s multicounty litigation against DePuy Orthopaedics. Attorneys for both sides must select three cases as bellwether trial candidates by October 15, 2012.

The latest news on the Stryker Rejuvinate recall reports that Stryker has warned in its recall notice that patients with the Rejuvenate or AGB II hip implant components may develop adverse  reactions that could manifest with symptoms of pain and/or swelling.* According to a  recent report  it appears eight  people  have filed lawsuits in New Jersey Superior Court, Bergen County claiming Stryker  sold their  Rejuvenate hip stem while knowing it had problems. The Stryker also appears to be having the same metal on metal toxicity problems as the DePuy even thou it is a metal component and not metal on metal product.

If you have a faulty DePuy or Stryker product you are encouraged to call our Metal on metal hip replacement helpline today to speak to a hip replacement lawyer.

St Jude Riata Defibrillator Lead Lawyers Filing Lawsuits For Lead Failure

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Class action lawyer network filng lawsuts for the St. Jude Riata Defibrillator lead

A product liability lawsuits has been filed by a Washington, D.C. man whose St. Jude Riata defibrillator lead failed, joining a growing number of complaints filed by individuals throughout the United States who have experienced similar problems with the recalled lead wires.
The complaint (PDF) was filed by Gary Rouse in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota on September 17, naming St. Jude Medical and Pacesetter, Inc. as defendants.
According to the lawsuit, Rouse received a St. Jude Riata lead in 2008, connecting his implantable defibrillator to his heart. However, he learned in July 2012 that the Riata lead was failing and he has had to undergo surgery near his heart to replace the defective lead.
A St. Jude Riata and Riata ST defbrillator lead recall was issued late last year, after the medical device manufacturer stopped selling the leads amid reports of the lead conductors poking through the insulation. If the leads penetrate the insulation, the wire can become exposed inside the patients’ body, posing several risks for patients.
Although St. Jude stopped selling the Riata leads and issued the recall, patients like Rouse were left with few options, since removing the leads, which are inserted through arteries leading to the heart, can be difficult and dangerous.
Last month, the FDA recommended that any individuals who received a St. Jude Riata or Riata ST lead obtain an x-ray or other imaging exam to check the condition of the leads.  The agency also recommended that doctors consider remote monitoring of patients with the recalled leads to quickly catch any electrical problems.
St. Jude was also ordered by the FDA to conduct new clinical studies on other defibrillator leads, including the newer St. Jude Riata ST Optim and St. Jude Durata leads.
At least three other St. Jude Riata lead lawsuits have been filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota by individuals who had to have their leads replaced because of design defects.

DePuy Recalls Custom Joint Implants, DePuy Recall Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class MDL Class Action News, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Medical Device Lawsuits, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Product Recall News, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Class action lawyers announce another DePuy recall: DePuy Hip replacement and custom joint implants

DePuy has been forced to recall another product. FDA Forces DePuy Recall of Custom Joint Implants
September 5, 2012 by: Linda Grayling

DePuy Orthopaedics is being forced to recall yet another line of hip and other artificial joint implants. This time, the Johnson & Johnson subsidiary is pulling back its custom orthopedic devices because of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety concerns. The recall notice was issued on August 24 — two years after its ASR hip-implant recall.

DePuy agreed in January 2012 to stop manufacturing the custom devices after a warning letter from the FDA. In it, the agency said the implants were being sold without federal approval, which requires an application with the FDA and clinical trials. DePuy argued that the devices were exempt because they were already approved by the FDA and modified only by doctors’ prescriptions, which is permitted by law.

But the FDA disagreed: “Although the devices’ size and shape may vary with each patient’s anatomy, the standardized design characteristics do not vary among the devices manufactured. The fact that final specifications are tailored to match a patient’s anatomy does not preclude a clinical study or submission of a marketing application for the devices.”

The FDA also said DePuy used poor quality-control systems in the production of the 14 types of custom implants. It ordered the company to recall any implants that had been delivered to surgeons prior to the halt in manufacturing earlier this year. More than 8,300 customized DePuy implants have been sold since 1999, but the number of unused devices in the recall is unknown.

DePuy already is dealing with a massive global recall of 93,000 ASR hip-replacement and hip-resurfacing devices that was announced in August 2010. The defective metal-on-metal hip implants have been shown to fail within a few years, resulting in painful revision surgeries. Typically, all-metal hip implants are expected to last about 15 years.

In addition, the DePuy artificial hips produce metal shavings when the ball and socket components grind against each other, causing metallosis, or metal poisoning of the blood. One British study found that when the metal debris becomes embedded in surrounding tissues, it increases the patient’s risk of bladder and kidney cancers.

In the United States, more than 8,000 patients have filed lawsuits against DePuy over their dangerous hip implants. Of those, 6,000 federal cases are part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL) that is being overseen by Judge David A. Katz in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The first case in the MDL is expected to go to trial in March or April 2013.

The remaining state cases are winding their way through the courts. The first three DePuy ASR lawsuits, which were scheduled to be tried together in Las Vegas, Nevada, were settled out of court recently. Bloomberg reported the plaintiffs each received about $200,000.

GranuFlo Recall, GranuFlo Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

 GranuFlo recall announced causing sudden heart attacks and death. GranuFlo lawyers filing lawsuits.

FDA Issues GranuFlo Recall
Elise Kramer | September 13th, 2012 | Posted in GranuFlo Lawsuits, Injury Lawsuit News

The Food and Drug Administration issued a recall of the dialysis products GranuFlo and NaturaLyte on the 29th of March, 2012, after a memo from drug maker Fresenius Medical Care was leaked to the public. These products are used during hemodialysis in order to remove toxins from the bloodstream of a patient whose kidneys are not functioning properly; however, GranuFlo and NaturaLyte have been linked to an increased risk of heart attack and sudden death. A number of patients who have experienced these side effects or whose loved ones have experienced them have filed suit against the drug manufacturer in the hopes of gaining compensation for the injuries.
Dangerous side effects linked to products

GranuFlo and NaturaLyte are similar products which were both designed to reduce the build-up of acid in the blood and to utilize bicarbonate in order to neutralize acids. However, these products are different from their competitors in that they use greater concentrations of bicarbonate, which can lead to serious health issues especially if doctors miscalculate the proper and safe dosage. Fatal overdoses, which can cause sudden death, and heart attacks are the most serious side effects of this product.

Fresenius Medical Care published an internal memo on the 4th of November, 2011, regarding risks associated with their product. A reported 941 patients had suffered heart attacks linked to the use of these products, and the memo detailed these “troubling findings”. Medical staff were informed that the problem needed to be “addressed urgently.” However, no contact was made with the Food and Drug Administration about these concerns, and no public warning was issued to patients at risk for GranuFlo related side effects. The memo was leaked to the Food and Drug Administration, which prompted a recall of the products.
Recall leads to individual lawsuits

Patients alerted to the recall suddenly may have been able to connect adverse health events that they had experienced to the use of GranuFlo, and many have hired GranuFlo attorneys in an effort to seek compensation that could help cover injury-related costs they have accumulated.

Stryker Hip Replacement Lawsuits, Stryker Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class MDL Class Action News, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Louisiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Product Recall News, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Tennessee Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

The lawsuits are beginning for the Stryker Rejuvenate Hip Replacemants. This is another failed implant just like the DePuy Hip Replacement. Both are metal component or metal on metal. If you have a faile Stryker Hip Replacment you must see a doctor as they have been recalled. Contact our Stryker Hip Replacement lawyers immediately. The news regarding the Stryker hip replacement is out. Stryker is faced with mounting lawsuits

New Jersey Stryker Hip Replacement Claims

many new nationwide  lawsuits were filed in New Jersey Superior Court, claiming that each of the plaintiffs received a Stryker Rejuvenate hip replacement, involving a modular femoral neck stem designed to allow the surgeon to customize the length of the component.

The lawsuits claim that the Stryker  design defects caused the hip replacements to loosen and move out of position, requiring people to undergo revision surgery.

What is The  Problem with Stryker Rejuvenate?

The Stryker Rejuvenate consists of a metal neck that fits inside of a metal stem to allow the implant to be customized for certain aspects of a patient’s anatomy and hip biomechanics.

In July 2012, a Stryker Rejuvenate recall was issued for the modular-neck hip stem components, due to a risk of corrosion at the modular neck junction. The design has been associated with metallosis problems where metal debris may be released into the body as the metal parts grind against each other, leading to hip pain, swelling, local tissue reactions and early failure of the entire hip replacement.

Stryker Lawyers Filing Stryker Rejuvenate Lawsuits

These lawsuits claim that  Stryker is liable for negligent design and manufacturing of the Stryker Rejuvenate system. Stryker has confirmed that the modular neck stem suffered from loosening, corrosion and fretting, similar to problems seen with metal-on-metal hip replacement systems.

The Stryker Hip Replacements Cause:

  • pseudotumors, tissue necrosis,
  • muscle loss,
  • bone loss around the implants,
  • metal poisoning or metallosis.

Coloplast Vaginal Mesh Lawyers, Coloplast Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class MDL Class Action News, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

As the lawsuits keep mounting up a new vaginal mesh manufacturer has been added. It seems as if there is no end to companies that have jumped on the golden mesh band wagon. Over 300,000 women have been implanted with vaginal mesh devices. Despite the warnings, and T.V lawyer ads,  doctors are still putting mesh in to this date. It never ceases to amaze me to see doctors sugggesting a brand new mesh over the old failed one. The vaginal mesh MDL lawyers are now filing lawsuits for a new mesh manufacturer that has been added to the West Virginia MDL, Coloplast. See the vaginal mesh news update below:

 Coloplast Vaginal Mesh  Products  Have Been Named in Mesh Lawsuits
According to their website, Coloplast develops products and services “to make life easier for people with deeply personal and private medical conditions.” The company has a special focus on surgical urology, developing surgical devices for both men and women. For women, Coloplast markets products to treat pelvic organ prolapse and to control urinary incontinence.
The August 6 order by the JPML centralized 13 Coloplast pelvic mesh lawsuits into West Virginia. All plaintiffs allege that the company’s products caused serious injuries. The products at issue in these lawsuits, Novasilk, Exair, Suspend, and Axis, are used to treat pelvic organ prolapse by supporting weakened pelvic muscles.
Consolidation into one court helps conserve resources, increase efficiency, and reduce the risk of duplicative discovery or conflicting rulings from other courts. Each lawsuit retains its individual nature, however, and will be returned to its original court for trial after pre-trial proceedings are complete.

This is part of the huge multi district litigations being filed by vaginal mesh lawyers for 1000's of women nationwide.