Class Action Article

  • File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit: Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Talcum Powder Fallopian Tube Cancer Lawsuits Baby  Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Filed If you or a loved one used talcum powder products and were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, or fallopian tube can...

Class Action News

Drug Class Actions

  • Taxotere Lawyers for Permanent Hair Loss: Taxotere Baldness Lawyers For  Permanent Hair Loss Lawsuits Have you received Taxotere for breast cancer? Taxotere can result in hair loss or baldness  that is permanent. Taxotere  is a chemotherapy drug used for the treatment of breas...

Medical Device Lawsuits

  • Zimmer Hip Replacement Lawyers: Network Zimmer Hip Replacement  Lawyer Win $2 Million Against Zimmer Hip Replacement Do You Have A Faulty Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prothesis With Connective Technology and Cobalt Chromium Head? Do You Have Have Metallosis or Chromium Cobalt T...

File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class Action Articles, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Dallas, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Denver, Detroit, Fallopian tube cancer lawyer, File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida vaginal mesh lawsuit, Fort Lauderdale, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Hawaii Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Homedica Recall Lawsuits, Houston, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Talcum Powder Lawyer, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Johnson and Johnson Baby Powder Lawsuit, Kansas city, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Las Vegas, Little Rock Talcum Powder Lawyer, Louisiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Louisville, Macon, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Miami, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minneapolis, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NYC, NYC Class Action Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ovarian cancer lawyer, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Philadelphia, Philadelphia Baby powder lawyer, Phoenix, Provo, Raleigh-Durham, Reno, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Sarasota, Seattle, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, st louis, St Louis Talcum Powder lawyer, Talcum Powder cancer lawyers, Talcum Powder Ovarian cancer lawyer, Tennessee Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Palm Beach, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits

Talcum Powder Fallopian Tube Cancer Lawsuits

Baby  Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Filed

If you or a loved one used talcum powder products and were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, or fallopian tube cancer speak to one of our talcum powder lawyers. Lawsuits are being filed for women who used talcum powder products on or around the genital area for over five years and now have diagnosis of ovarian cancer or fallopian tube cancer.

What Talcum Powder  Products Are In Question?

Talcum powder products such as  Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower are suspect for causing both ovarian cancer and fallopian tube cancer in women,  These products have been used by women for decades to absorb moisture and for personal hygiene.

Can I File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit?

Women are filing talcum powder cancer  lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson for knowing about the possible risk of ovarian cancer and fallopian tube cancer with the use of their products.  They failed to warn doctors, women and the public. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with ovarian cancer or fallopian tube cancer after using these products you may be eligible to join other women in a products liability lawsuit.  Complete the form to see if you may qualify for joining the lawsuit.

Hernia Mesh Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Boca Raton, Boston, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Charleston, Charlotte, Class Action Articles, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Dallas, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Denver, Detroit, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Fort Lauderdale, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Hernia mesh lawyer, Houston, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas city, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Louisiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Louisville, Macon, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mass tort lawyer, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Miami, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minneapolis, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NYC, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Physiomesh Hernia Mesh Lawsuit, Physiomesh Lawyer, Provo, Raleigh-Durham, Reno, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Sarasota, Seattle, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, st louis, Tennessee Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Toledo, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Palm Beach, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Ethicon has recalled it’s Physiomesh and hernia mesh lawyers are filing hernia mesh lawsuits for a failed hernia mesh.

Complications From A  Hernia Mesh Repair?

Has the Hernia Returned?

Patients are having complications from  the Ethicon defective recalled hernia mesh. Hernia mesh lawyers are accepting lawsuits. The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) is scheduled to hear oral arguments about consolidating federally filed lawsuits involving Atrium Medical Corp.’s C-Qur line of polypropylene surgical mesh for hernia repair.  Hernia mesh lawyers expect that an MDL for Ethicon’s Physiomesh will be formed soon given the number of cases coming forth.

 Florida Physiomesh Lawsuit Filed

There has been a Florida lawsuit filed on December 27, 2016 in the U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida for  complications associated with the defective mesh. It was necessary for this woman to go thru additional hernia revision surgery.  An abdominal bulge, recurrent hernia, pain, and adhesion was suffered Her lawsuit claims that the Physiomesh Composite mesh patch for her hernia surgery was not reasonably safe. The risks of the design outweighed any potential benefits. (Case No. 8:16-cv-03502-JDW-JSS)

Hernia Mesh Lawyers Are Filing Lawsuits

There has been a need for revision surgery due to:

  • Severe Abdominal Pain
  • Organ Perforation, Adhesions or Erosion
  • Infections

Surgical Removal of Hernia Mesh Lawsuits

 

Power Morcellator Uterine Cancer Lawyers | Morcellator Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Anaheim, Atlanta, Baltimore, Biloxi, Boca Raton, Boston, Charleston, Charlotte, Denver, Detroit, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Fort Lauderdale, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Houston, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Los Angeles, Louisville, Macon, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Medical Device Lawsuits, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NYC, NYC Class Action Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Power Morcellator Lawyers, Provo, Raleigh-Durham, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Palm Beach, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Power Morcellator Lawyers Filing Lawsuits

Power Morcellator Device Spreads Uterine Cancer Continue To Grow

Morcellator lawyers advise that  power Morcellator lawsuits have been consolidated by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.  2652 cases have been filed for women who underwent laparoscopic power morcellation for hysterectomies or myomectomies and were put at  risk for spreading previously hidden cancer cells. The Facts
  1. The Morcellator   has jaw-like blades that rapidly spin to shred fibroid tissue so that the pieces are able to be removed from the body.
  2. It is now known that as  tool does this, it uncovers and disseminates uterine sarcoma cells.
  3. The FDA  issued a safety warning against laparoscopic power morcellation procedures  due to the risk of spreading cancer.
  4. Many women  have developed serious or fatal leiomyosarcoma.
  5. There have been  deaths of “hundreds, if not thousands of women in America”.
Morcellator lawyers at Class Action Lawyer Netowork are accepting cases for women  who have undergone power morcellation and who has subsequently been diagnosed with cancer.  

Zimmer NexGen Knee Replacement Class Action Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Hawaii Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Louisiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Medical Device Lawsuits, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NexGen Knee Replacement lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NYC Class Action Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Tennessee Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Zimmer Knee Replacement lawyer

NexGen Knee Replacement Lawyers For Failure And Complications

What  Are The Complications of Zimmer NexGen Knee Replacements?

 Early failure and replacement of the device
Loosening of artificial knee
Knee or joint pain
Popping, Fracture, Dislocation
Difficulty walking or standing

Defective Knee Replacement Attorney For Filing In The  NexGen MDL Class Action

MIS Tibial Components and the NexGen LPS-Flex GSF Femoral Component lawsuits,  have been consolidated in the U.S. District Court of Northern Illinois under the multidistrict litigation (MDL) case number 2272. Zimmer Manufacturing has recalled the NexGen MIS Tibial Component due to to one or more complications.

Devices In The NexGen MDL Class Action:
All NexGen MIS Total Knee Procedure Stemmed Tibial Components
NexGen Complete Knee Solution Cruciate Retaining-Flex Femoral Components (CR-Flex)
NexGen Complete Knee Solution Gender Solutions Female LPS-Flex (GSF LPS-Flex)
NexGen Complete Knee Solution Legacy Posterior Stabilized-Flex Femoral Components (LPS-Flex)
NexGen Complete Knee Solution CR-Flex Gender Solutions Female CR-Flex (GSF-Flex)

If you have a Zimmer NexGen knee replacement  and are experiencing complications  your doctor immediately to evaluate if the device is working properly.  You may need revision surgery. Speak to one of our NexGen knee replacement lawyers.

 

Actos Lawsuit Update

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Actos Lawsuit Lawyers, Drug Lawsuits, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Actos is a medication taken by Type II  ( adult onset ) diabetics to control their insulin production. Actos lawsuits are being filed for victims of bladder cancer from Actos.

Actos Lawsuit Update

 Actos lawsuits that allege long-term use of the Type 2 diabetes drug caused patients to develop bladder cancer continue to move forward in a multidistrict litigation underway in U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana. According to court documents, the proceeding’s next Case Management Conference will be held on Thursday, October 24, 2013, at 10:30 a.m. (In re: Actos Product Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2299)

Actos Lawsuit News

According to court documents Actos litigation involving bladder cancer allegations got underway shortly after the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) warned in June 2011 that use of the drug for 12 months or more had been associated with an increased risk of the disease. At that time, the FDA ordered Takeda Pharmaceuticals to add new warnings to the Actos label about its potential to cause bladder cancer.
Court filings indicate that more than 2,500 Actos lawsuits are now pending in the Western District of Louisiana, where the first case will go to trial in January. Plaintiffs in Actos lawsuits allege that Takeda Pharmaceuticals and other defendants concealed knowledge that the medication could increase a person’s chances of developing bladder cancer, and failed to provide adequate warnings about that risk to the public and medical community.
On the state level, two Actos claims involving bladder cancer allegations have already gone to trial. Last month, a Maryland State Court jury awarded $1.7 million to the family of a man who died of bladder cancer following long-term use of Actos. However, according to court records, the judge presiding over the trial tossed out the verdict because the jury also found that the decedent’s decades-long smoking habit contributed to the development of the disease. (An v. Nieberlein, 24-C12003565, Circuit Court for the City of Baltimore, State of Maryland.)
This past April, a Los Angeles Superior Court jury awarded $6.5 million to a plaintiff who developed bladder cancer following four years of Actos use. However, the plaintiff is currently appealing a decision by the judge overseeing the case to grant Takeda Pharmaceuticals’ request to set aside the verdict. (Cooper v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc., CGC-12-518535, California Superior Court)
Long-term users of Actos ( over 2 years ) who have been diagnosed with bladder cancer may be eligible to file an Actos lawsuit against Takeda Pharmaceuticals.

Actos Lawsuit Criteria

1. You must have taken Actos for over two years

2. You must have a confirmed diagnosis of bladder cancer

3. You must have no prior medical history of baldder cancer prior to taking Actos

Resperdal Class Action Lawyers, Resperdal Lawsuit Helpline

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Drug Lawsuits, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Resperdal lawsuits

Risperdal Lawyers Filing Gynecomastia Lawsuits

If you or a loved one was prescribed Risperdal as a teenage boy and now have enlarged breasts, developed female type breasts and /or been diagnosed with Gynecomastia,  contact Class Action Lawyer Network  Risperdal Injury Lawyers today to discuss your options in a Risperdal lawsuit.

Our Resperdal lawyers are reviewing cases for young  boys diagnosed with gynecomastia or male breasts after using Risperdal. Problems may result in:

  •     Breast Growth Among Boys
  •     Puffy Nipples or Enlarged Nipples
  •     Galactorrhea (production of milk from breasts)
  •     Painful Breasts or Nipple Discharge
  •     Mastectomy or Gynecomastia Surgery to Remove Male Breasts
  •     Gynecomastia (growth of male breasts, which may be painful or tender)

If your son has been diagnosed with Gynacomastia call our Resperdal helpline and speak to our trained medical social worker today.

Rispedral Side Effects In Male Children

Risperdal (risperidone) is an antipsychotic manufactured by Johnson & Johnson. It  was originally approved by the FDA for use for adults with schizophrenia.  Risperdal has also been widely used by children for bi-polar disorders, autism, irritability, aggression and behavior disorders.

Speak To A Risperdal Lawyer

The Riserdal  lawyers are reviewing cases for Risperdal breast growth among boys.

Children Are Being Injured By Risperdal

Lawsuits are being filed  for  abnormal development of large mammary glands among boys and adolescents, resulting in breast development.  Surgery has been  necessary to remove the breasts caused by the Risperdal gynecomastia.  This has caused emotional trauma for boys and young adult males and some incidents of suicide. Parents throughout the United States are pursuing a Rispedal lawsuit on behalf of kchildren  who developed breasts on Risperdal.

Lawsuits allege that Johnson & Johnson failed to adequately research the effects of their medication or warn about the connection between Risperdal and breast growth.

Risperdal Lawsuit Update

Although Resperdal is not currently an MDL, settlements for Risperdal breast growth have been reached by Johnson & Johnson in lawsuits bellwether trials where a number of cases are presented to juries to test the potential settlements and outcomes. Do not delay. Call no to discuss a Resperdal lawsuit.
 

 

 

Female Class Action Lawsuit Lawyers For Women

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Actos Lawsuit Lawyers, Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class Action Articles, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, GranuFlo Dialysis Medication Lawyers, Hawaii Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Louisiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mirena IUD Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Stryker Hip replacement recall lawyer, Stryker Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate Hip replacement recall lawyers, Tennessee Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Toxic Substances, Tylenol Liver Damage Lawsuits, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

It has become apparent that there is a large number of drugs and devices class actions that have been filed against manyfacturers that have targeted women.

We can start with the Dow Corning  siicone  breast implant class action of years ago.  Women are still suffering today. The Dow Corning Trust just recently launched a silicone breast implant explant program.  The leaking silicone and bursting implants  lead to toxicity related immune system diseases like lupus and fibromylagia and other immune deficiency diseases. Women to this date are still suffering from their Dow silicone Breast Implants and the Dow Corning settlement trust is stll living out payments like the new breast explant program.

          Fosamax was supposed to cure osteoporosis but ended up  causing femur fractures.Then we have Yaz and Yasmine birth control pills. Young women were having their lives  altered by pre-mature strokes, pulmonary embolisms, deep vein thrombosis, blood clots  and heart attacks.  Many girls harmed were  barely starting a college life.

       History moves along to the metal on metal and metal componednt hip replacements like the  DePuy Pinnacle and ASR Hip Replacement and the Stryker Rejuvinate and ABG II Modular Stems. These are  a metal on metal hip replacement recalled for their  need for revision surgery. These hip replacements failed  in women more then men. The  smaller frame of a women makes the device more prone to problems in the female structure.

NuvaRing Lawsuits

NuvRing has been another disaster for women causing:

    blood clots in women
    cerebral thrombosis in women
    deep vein thrombosis
    heart attack in women
    pulmonary embolism
    retinal thrombosis in women
    stroke or cerebral hemorrhage
    thrombophlebitis and venous thrombosis with or without embolism
    toxic shock syndrome

Fosamax Lawsuits

Fosamax for osteoporosis actually causes what it is prescribed to fix , femur fractures.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

   The biggest and most horrific is the  the various vaginal mesh devices for urinary incontinence and uterine, bladder and bowel prolapse. This mesh device is made of a Prolene plastic synthetic fiber that has been falling aprt in women. Thousands of  women across the country are screaming the horrors of the vaginal mesh and lawsuits are being filed in droves. Women are in severe pain described  as razor blades. The mesh  has been reported by female victims to be  eroding thru the vaginal wall and at times into the bladder and bowel.  Women can no longer have sexual intercourse and marriages are falling apart. Women are losing their jobs and cannot work.  And then we have  the Mirena IUD which has been gravitating our of postion and ending up embedded in the uterus or a nearby organ.

Lives are being ruined and justice must be sought. Lawsuits are the only thing these manufacturers understand.

 

Lawyers For Yaz, Fosamax, NuvaRing, Pradaxa, Mesh, SSRI’s, Actos,Tylenol, DePuy, Stryker

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in ABG Modular Stem lawyers, Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, APG II Recall Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, DePuy Pinnacle Hip Replacement Updates, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, GranuFlo Dialysis Medication Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Louisiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, revuvinate recall lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Stryker Hip replacement recall lawyer, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Toxic Substances, Transvaginal mesh, Tylenol Liver Damage Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

We continue to accept nationwide vaginal mesh and bladder sling cases, Actos lawsuits, NuvaRing lawsuits, Dialysis medication lawsuits, Pradaxa lawsuits, Hip Replacement lawsuits, SSRI birth defect lawsuits, Tylenol lawsuits, Yaz lawsuits and others.

Vaginal Mesh

Nationwide vaginal mesh and bladder sling cases

Actos Lawyers

Patients have been diagnosed with bladder cancer after consuming the diabetes drug Actos.

Chemical Toxins Leach V Dupont Class Action Lawyers

Patients diagnosed with kidney cancer, testicular cancer, ulcerative colitis and/or thyroid disease who are members of the Leach v. Dupont class.  Leach class definition: a person who drank contaminated water for at least one year prior to December 3, 2004 from one of six named water districts, or specified private drinking water wells contaminated with C-8.  The affected water districts are:

Patients diagnosed with kidney cancer, testicular cancer, ulcerative colitis and/or thyroid disease who are members of the Leach v. Dupont class.  Leach class definition: a person who drank contaminated water for at least one year prior to December 3, 2004 from one of six named water districts, or specified private drinking water wells contaminated with C-8.  The affected water districts are (1) Little Hocking, Ohion (2) Lubeck Public Service District, West Virginia (3) City of Belpre, Ohio (4)  Tuppers Plains, Ohio (5) Mason County Public Service District, West Virginia (6) Village of Pomeroy, Ohio.

Chemical exposure lawyer Little Hocking,

Chemical exposure lawyer Lubeck Public Service District,

Chemical exposure lawyer Belpre,

Chemical exposure lawyer Tuppers Plains,

Chemical exposure lawyer Mason County Public Service District,

Chemical exposure lawyer West Virginia ,

Chemical exposure lawyer Village of Pomeroy

It does not matter where class member now reside, so long as they lived in one of the contaminated areas and drank the water at least one year effective December 3, 2004.

DePuy Hip Pinnacle and ASR Hip Implant Recall Lawyers

Faulty Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants.

Fosamax Lawyers

We are actively pursuing new Fosamax femur fracture cases.  Our intake criteria for these cases is as follows: (1) proof of at least 4 years of Fosamax use or other oral bisphosphonates; (2) fracture of the subtrochanteric or shaft area of the femur; (3) no or minimal trauma associated with the fracture; (4) 80 years old or younger at time of fracture.

Granuflo, Naturalyte Dialysis Mediction Lawyers

We are litigating cases aagainst Fresenius, the German manufacturer and distributor of GranuFlo and NaturaLyte dialysate products. These products are supposed to safely filter and cleanse the bloodGranuFlo/NaturaLyte has been directly linked to unsafe levels of bicarbonate in dialysis patients.

Nuvaring Lawyers

Accepting cases preferably for injuries arising after 2011.  Organon/Merck’s vaginal ring contraceptive drug/device are being actively litigated in both state and federal venues, and have been since late 2007. Plaintiffs allege that NuvaRing increases a woman’s risk of blood clots, heart attack, and stroke above and beyond the risk that is mentioned in the label.

Pradaxa Excessive Bleeding Lawyers

Pradaxa is an anticoagulant drug indicated for patients who have been diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. Pradaxa was heralded as a treatment advance because it is easier to take than its competitor, it also can cause uncontrollable bleeding which cannot be stopped by any antidote.  Accordingly, there have been bleeding events which have lasted for days.  Some clients have been told that there is simply nothing medical science can do to stop the bleeding.  People have died

Lexapro/Celexa, Zoloft, Prozac, Effexor, Wellbutrin and Pax Lawyers

SSRI antidepressant manu­facturers, including Glaxo-SmithKline, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Forest Laboratories, alleging a variety of birth defects from prenatal exposure to these drugs. The products involved include Lexapro/Celexa, Zoloft, Prozac, Effexor, Wellbutrin and Paxil.

Stryker Hip Replacement Lawyers

Litigation against Stryker.  “Rejuvenate” and “ABGII” stem implants were recalled in the summer of 2012, and the failure of these femoral stems has caused enormous damage for those patients as a result of “fretting” in the modular neck- stem junction, leading to corrosion and exposure to large amounts of metallic debris.

Tylenol Lawyers For Liver Damage

Branded Tylenol acetaminophen toxicity causing acute liver failure requiring hospitalization.

Yaz Lawyers

*Only for injuries that occurred before 4/10/2012 as well as from states with 3+ year SOLs and Discovery rules. Cardiovascular injuries caused by Drospirenone (DRSP), the active progestin component in these oral contraceptive pills.  Deep Vein Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, Blood Clots and certain types of Stroke.

Vaginal Mesh Lawyers Updated Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Information

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Medical Device Lawsuits, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Transvaginal mesh, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Class Action Lawyer Network, vaginal mesh lawyers are  accepting all TVT, Vaginal Mesh and Bladder Sling lawsuits at this time. Although many states have reached the 2 year statute of limitation cut off dates, our vaginal mesh lawyers are still accepting these lawsuits on a case by case basis.

The following is a list of vaginal mesh lawsuit states that do not have a 2 year statute of limitations. Kentucky, Louisiana and Tennessee have a one year statute of limitations.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits  Statute Of Limitations

ARK = 3 Yrs. (Non-discovery)
DC = 3 Yrs.
FL = 4 Yrs.
Maine = 6 Yrs. (Non-discovery)
Mass = 3 Yrs.
MI = 3 Yrs.
Minn = 4 Yrs.
Mont = 3 Yrs.
NH = 3 Yrs.
NM = 3 Yrs.
NY = 3 Yrs. (Non-discovery)
NC = 6 Yrs.
RI = 3 Yrs.
SC = 3 Yrs.
WA = 3 Yrs.
WI = 3 Yrs
WY = 4 Yrs.
 
Non-discovery means SOL starts to run from DATE OF IMPLANT.
 
Most vaginal mesh lawsuits are being filed in the consolidated MDL'S in West Virginia.
Vaginal Mesh Multi District Lawsuit List Consolidated Under Judge Goodwin in West Virginia

    MDL – 2325, IN RE: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL No. 2187 | In RE: CR Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2326 IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2327 IN RE: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2387 IN RE: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation
    Cook Medical Surgical will be the 5th MDL
Vaginal mesh lawsuits are being accepted for all of the manufacturers listed above. Boston Scientific and AMS vaginal mesh cases have a unique advantage. If you have had your vaginal mesh implanted in a 2 year statute state and it is a Boston Scientific or AMS product the lawsuit can be moved to the state's of the mnaiufacturers. This is Minnesota and Massachusetts. These states have not reached the statute filing date as of yet.

Contact our vaginal mesh lawyers for more information on filing you vaginal mesh lawsuits for class action lawsuit against mesh.

 

Lipitor Harming Women, Lipitor Lawyers Filing Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Hawaii Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Lipitor Lawsuits, Louisiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Tennessee Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Lipitor lawyers of Class Action Lawyer Network are filing lawsuits for women who are getting type 2 diabetis from lipitor.

Lipitor is prescribed  to lower her cholesterol levels and help decrease the  risk of developing cardiovascular disease. However, after using the medication many women are being d diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.

It  appears Pfizer knew about the increased risk of diabetes from Lipitor, but failed to provide adequate warnings for women and their doctors.

Lipitor Is Causing  Type 2 diabetes in women taking Lipitor

What Is Lipitor?

Lipitor (atorvastatin) is one of the most widely used brand-name medications in the United States.  Millions of people  take  the medication to help lower cholesterol.  Pfizer had more than $125 billion in Lipitor sales.

FDA Warning For Lipitor

In February 2012, the FDA required new diabetes warnings for Lipitor.  This was due to the increased risk of changes to blood glucose levels.

Lipitor lawyers are filing Lipitor  lawsuits

Mullti District Litigation Consolidation For Lipitor Lawsuits

U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) rejected a request filed by Lipitor lawyers to centralize all cases brought in the federal court system. The MDL panel has determined that each of the cases will proceed as individual lawsuits in the U.S. District Court where they were filed.More than half of the pending actions are already consolidated  before one judge in the District of South Carolina.

If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with Type II Diabetis after taking Lipitor contact us to speak toa Lipitor lawyer today.