Complications From A Hernia Mesh Repair?
Has the Hernia Returned?Patients are having complications from the Ethicon defective recalled hernia mesh. Hernia mesh lawyers are accepting lawsuits. The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) is scheduled to hear oral arguments about consolidating federally filed lawsuits involving Atrium Medical Corp.’s C-Qur line of polypropylene surgical mesh for hernia repair. Hernia mesh lawyers expect that an MDL for Ethicon’s Physiomesh will be formed soon given the number of cases coming forth.
Florida Physiomesh Lawsuit FiledThere has been a Florida lawsuit filed on December 27, 2016 in the U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida for complications associated with the defective mesh. It was necessary for this woman to go thru additional hernia revision surgery. An abdominal bulge, recurrent hernia, pain, and adhesion was suffered Her lawsuit claims that the Physiomesh Composite mesh patch for her hernia surgery was not reasonably safe. The risks of the design outweighed any potential benefits. (Case No. 8:16-cv-03502-JDW-JSS)
Hernia Mesh Lawyers Are Filing Lawsuits
There has been a need for revision surgery due to:
- Severe Abdominal Pain
- Organ Perforation, Adhesions or Erosion
Surgical Removal of Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
Pennsylvania Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawyers Pennsylvania Talcum Powder LawyersPennsylvania: Allentown, Erie, Harrisburg, Lancaster, Meadville, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Pocanos, Reading, Scranton, Williamsport. Talcum powder- baby powder ovarian cancer diagnosis lawyers. Philadelphia Talcum Powder Lawyers Filing
Talcum Powder LawsuitsOur Philadelphia Talcum powder attorneys are helping women file “Talc-powder products gave me ovarian cancer lawsuits.” Lawsuits are being filed against Johnson & Johnson for not warning of the dangers of Talc. in their Baby powder and Shower To Shower products.
Did you Get Ovarian Cancer after using Talcum Powder?Studies show that Talcum Powder can be linked to Ovarian Cancer Johnson & Johnson, the same company with 100’s of vaginal mesh lawsuits filed against them, has talcum powder class-action lawsuits filed against them claiming they are responsible for giving women ovarian cancer by not warning of the dangers of their talcum powder products.
Fight Back- File An Ovarian Cancer LawsuitThe first study linking talc and cancer took place in 1971 and they never told you.
An Ovarian Cancer Patient Won A LawsuitThe first talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuit was won against Johnson & Johnson in federal court in 2013.
Evidence of a Link Between Cancer and TalcThe link between ovarian cancer and talcum powder was discovered in 1971 in a study that found talc particles in the ovarian tissue of female cancer patients. Talc particles move thru the vagina and are able to travel into the ovaries. A South Dakota jury found that Johnson & Johnson failed to warn consumers of the link between the use of their talc powders for feminine hygiene and an increased risk of ovarian cancer.
File Your Talcum Powder LawsuitWomen are waking up and more claims will be filed by women who have developed ovarian cancer following the use of talcum powder. Have You Used Johnson’s Baby Powder, Shower to Shower, Have You Been Diagnosed With Ovarian Cancer? Find Out How Talcum Powder Is Linked To Ovarian Cancer Get a Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Allentown, Erie, Reading, Scranton, Bethlehem, Lancaster, Levittown,Harrisburg talcum powder lawyer.
Power Morcellator Lawyers Filing Lawsuits
Power Morcellator Device Spreads Uterine Cancer Continue To GrowMorcellator lawyers advise that power Morcellator lawsuits have been consolidated by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. 2652 cases have been filed for women who underwent laparoscopic power morcellation for hysterectomies or myomectomies and were put at risk for spreading previously hidden cancer cells. The Facts
- The Morcellator has jaw-like blades that rapidly spin to shred fibroid tissue so that the pieces are able to be removed from the body.
- It is now known that as tool does this, it uncovers and disseminates uterine sarcoma cells.
- The FDA issued a safety warning against laparoscopic power morcellation procedures due to the risk of spreading cancer.
- Many women have developed serious or fatal leiomyosarcoma.
- There have been deaths of “hundreds, if not thousands of women in America”.
Hemorrhages Caused by Xarelto
Xarelto Lawyers Filing Extensive Bleeding LawsuitsOur Xarelto lawyers are accepting Xarelto lawsuits for hemorrhage caused by Xarelto. Nationwide Xarelto attorneys are reviewing cases of excessive bleeding from Xarelto. In a recent Xareleto lawsuit a widow from Missouri has filed an Xarelto claim against Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Research & Development, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, et al. to demand that the defendants be held liable for the death of her husband. Dixie A. Smith, surviving spouse of Jay Christopher Smith, filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, where it joins similar lawsuits pending in multidistrict litigation (MDL) No. 2592 before Judge Fallon. The plaintiff contends that had her late husband never taken the defendants’ medication, Xarelto, he would not have suffered a deadly intracerebral hemorrhage. Ms. Smith is suing for compensatory damages for past, present, and future economic expenditures incurred as a result of the decedent’s use of Xarelto, including medical and funeral expenses, loss of earnings, loss of companionship and support, and loss of the prospective net accumulations of an estate. Xarelto Caused A Brain Hemorrhage The decedent’s physician prescribed Xarelto (rivaroxaban) during December of 2012. He continued to take the medication as prescribed until May of 2013. On May 4, the decedent was admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), at which point the hospital staff discontinued his use of Xarelto. He was transferred to the care of a specialty hospital unit on May 18 and on May 22 he died of the intracerebral hemorrhage. According to Ms. Smith’s Xarelto lawsuit, her late husband’s passing was a direct result of his use of rivaroxaban, which he reportedly never would have taken had he been fully informed of the risks. Xarelto is an anticoagulant or blood thinner that is prescribed for the treatment and prevention of blood clots. The medication is intended to reduce the risk of life-threatening complications caused by blood clots, including pulmonary embolism and stroke. Xarelto Lawsuits The product liability lawsuit regarding Xarelto draws attention to several reviews and clinical studies of the drug, including a 2012 report issued by The Institute for Safe Medication Practices. This report stated that there had been “356 reports of serious, disabling, or fatal injury in which rivaroxaban was the primary suspect drug. The report more than doubled from the previous quarter total of 128 cases.” The organization brought these statistics to the attention of the defendants, who reportedly advised The Institute for Safe Medication Practices that the data did not reflect any safety issues that required action. Ms. Smith’s Xarelto lawsuit alleges that the defendants prioritized profit over patient safety. Her complaint further claims that the defendants concealed their knowledge of the severe and life-threatening complications of Xarelto from consumers and the medical community. The lawsuit notes that the pharmaceutical giants failed to highlight the risks of uncontrollable bleeding events, nor did they provide medical protocols for stabilizing patients suffering from these bleeding events. Xarelto had been marketed as a replacement for an older blood thinner, warfarin (Coumadin). Warfarin has been used for years for patients who may be at a higher risk of blood clots. However, patients taking warfarin required regular medical monitoring and dietary restrictions, which Xarelto had promised to eliminate. Our Xarelto lawyers have been reviewing claims for excessive bleeding like these. Xarelto lawsuits are now consolidated in an MDL because many people have suffered injuries of a same type from Xarelto. Speak to an Xarelto lawyer today.
NexGen Knee Replacement Lawyers For Failure And Complications
What Are The Complications of Zimmer NexGen Knee Replacements?
Early failure and replacement of the device
Loosening of artificial knee
Knee or joint pain
Popping, Fracture, Dislocation
Difficulty walking or standing
Defective Knee Replacement Attorney For Filing In The NexGen MDL Class Action
MIS Tibial Components and the NexGen LPS-Flex GSF Femoral Component lawsuits, have been consolidated in the U.S. District Court of Northern Illinois under the multidistrict litigation (MDL) case number 2272. Zimmer Manufacturing has recalled the NexGen MIS Tibial Component due to to one or more complications.
Devices In The NexGen MDL Class Action:
All NexGen MIS Total Knee Procedure Stemmed Tibial Components
NexGen Complete Knee Solution Cruciate Retaining-Flex Femoral Components (CR-Flex)
NexGen Complete Knee Solution Gender Solutions Female LPS-Flex (GSF LPS-Flex)
NexGen Complete Knee Solution Legacy Posterior Stabilized-Flex Femoral Components (LPS-Flex)
NexGen Complete Knee Solution CR-Flex Gender Solutions Female CR-Flex (GSF-Flex)
If you have a Zimmer NexGen knee replacement and are experiencing complications your doctor immediately to evaluate if the device is working properly. You may need revision surgery. Speak to one of our NexGen knee replacement lawyers.
It has become apparent that there is a large number of drugs and devices class actions that have been filed against manyfacturers that have targeted women.
We can start with the Dow Corning siicone breast implant class action of years ago. Women are still suffering today. The Dow Corning Trust just recently launched a silicone breast implant explant program. The leaking silicone and bursting implants lead to toxicity related immune system diseases like lupus and fibromylagia and other immune deficiency diseases. Women to this date are still suffering from their Dow silicone Breast Implants and the Dow Corning settlement trust is stll living out payments like the new breast explant program.
Fosamax was supposed to cure osteoporosis but ended up causing femur fractures.Then we have Yaz and Yasmine birth control pills. Young women were having their lives altered by pre-mature strokes, pulmonary embolisms, deep vein thrombosis, blood clots and heart attacks. Many girls harmed were barely starting a college life.
History moves along to the metal on metal and metal componednt hip replacements like the DePuy Pinnacle and ASR Hip Replacement and the Stryker Rejuvinate and ABG II Modular Stems. These are a metal on metal hip replacement recalled for their need for revision surgery. These hip replacements failed in women more then men. The smaller frame of a women makes the device more prone to problems in the female structure.
NuvRing has been another disaster for women causing:
blood clots in women
cerebral thrombosis in women
deep vein thrombosis
heart attack in women
retinal thrombosis in women
stroke or cerebral hemorrhage
thrombophlebitis and venous thrombosis with or without embolism
toxic shock syndrome
Fosamax for osteoporosis actually causes what it is prescribed to fix , femur fractures.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits
The biggest and most horrific is the the various vaginal mesh devices for urinary incontinence and uterine, bladder and bowel prolapse. This mesh device is made of a Prolene plastic synthetic fiber that has been falling aprt in women. Thousands of women across the country are screaming the horrors of the vaginal mesh and lawsuits are being filed in droves. Women are in severe pain described as razor blades. The mesh has been reported by female victims to be eroding thru the vaginal wall and at times into the bladder and bowel. Women can no longer have sexual intercourse and marriages are falling apart. Women are losing their jobs and cannot work. And then we have the Mirena IUD which has been gravitating our of postion and ending up embedded in the uterus or a nearby organ.
Lives are being ruined and justice must be sought. Lawsuits are the only thing these manufacturers understand.
We continue to accept nationwide vaginal mesh and bladder sling cases, Actos lawsuits, NuvaRing lawsuits, Dialysis medication lawsuits, Pradaxa lawsuits, Hip Replacement lawsuits, SSRI birth defect lawsuits, Tylenol lawsuits, Yaz lawsuits and others.
Nationwide vaginal mesh and bladder sling cases
Patients have been diagnosed with bladder cancer after consuming the diabetes drug Actos.
Chemical Toxins Leach V Dupont Class Action Lawyers
Patients diagnosed with kidney cancer, testicular cancer, ulcerative colitis and/or thyroid disease who are members of the Leach v. Dupont class. Leach class definition: a person who drank contaminated water for at least one year prior to December 3, 2004 from one of six named water districts, or specified private drinking water wells contaminated with C-8. The affected water districts are:
Patients diagnosed with kidney cancer, testicular cancer, ulcerative colitis and/or thyroid disease who are members of the Leach v. Dupont class. Leach class definition: a person who drank contaminated water for at least one year prior to December 3, 2004 from one of six named water districts, or specified private drinking water wells contaminated with C-8. The affected water districts are (1) Little Hocking, Ohion (2) Lubeck Public Service District, West Virginia (3) City of Belpre, Ohio (4) Tuppers Plains, Ohio (5) Mason County Public Service District, West Virginia (6) Village of Pomeroy, Ohio.
Chemical exposure lawyer Little Hocking,
Chemical exposure lawyer Lubeck Public Service District,
Chemical exposure lawyer Belpre,
Chemical exposure lawyer Tuppers Plains,
Chemical exposure lawyer Mason County Public Service District,
Chemical exposure lawyer West Virginia ,
Chemical exposure lawyer Village of Pomeroy
It does not matter where class member now reside, so long as they lived in one of the contaminated areas and drank the water at least one year effective December 3, 2004.
DePuy Hip Pinnacle and ASR Hip Implant Recall Lawyers
Faulty Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants.
We are actively pursuing new Fosamax femur fracture cases. Our intake criteria for these cases is as follows: (1) proof of at least 4 years of Fosamax use or other oral bisphosphonates; (2) fracture of the subtrochanteric or shaft area of the femur; (3) no or minimal trauma associated with the fracture; (4) 80 years old or younger at time of fracture.
Granuflo, Naturalyte Dialysis Mediction Lawyers
We are litigating cases aagainst Fresenius, the German manufacturer and distributor of GranuFlo and NaturaLyte dialysate products. These products are supposed to safely filter and cleanse the bloodGranuFlo/NaturaLyte has been directly linked to unsafe levels of bicarbonate in dialysis patients.
Accepting cases preferably for injuries arising after 2011. Organon/Merck’s vaginal ring contraceptive drug/device are being actively litigated in both state and federal venues, and have been since late 2007. Plaintiffs allege that NuvaRing increases a woman’s risk of blood clots, heart attack, and stroke above and beyond the risk that is mentioned in the label.
Pradaxa Excessive Bleeding Lawyers
Pradaxa is an anticoagulant drug indicated for patients who have been diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. Pradaxa was heralded as a treatment advance because it is easier to take than its competitor, it also can cause uncontrollable bleeding which cannot be stopped by any antidote. Accordingly, there have been bleeding events which have lasted for days. Some clients have been told that there is simply nothing medical science can do to stop the bleeding. People have died
Lexapro/Celexa, Zoloft, Prozac, Effexor, Wellbutrin and Pax Lawyers
SSRI antidepressant manufacturers, including Glaxo-SmithKline, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Forest Laboratories, alleging a variety of birth defects from prenatal exposure to these drugs. The products involved include Lexapro/Celexa, Zoloft, Prozac, Effexor, Wellbutrin and Paxil.
Stryker Hip Replacement Lawyers
Litigation against Stryker. “Rejuvenate” and “ABGII” stem implants were recalled in the summer of 2012, and the failure of these femoral stems has caused enormous damage for those patients as a result of “fretting” in the modular neck- stem junction, leading to corrosion and exposure to large amounts of metallic debris.
Tylenol Lawyers For Liver Damage
Branded Tylenol acetaminophen toxicity causing acute liver failure requiring hospitalization.
*Only for injuries that occurred before 4/10/2012 as well as from states with 3+ year SOLs and Discovery rules. Cardiovascular injuries caused by Drospirenone (DRSP), the active progestin component in these oral contraceptive pills. Deep Vein Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, Blood Clots and certain types of Stroke.
Class Action Lawyer Network, vaginal mesh lawyers are accepting all TVT, Vaginal Mesh and Bladder Sling lawsuits at this time. Although many states have reached the 2 year statute of limitation cut off dates, our vaginal mesh lawyers are still accepting these lawsuits on a case by case basis.
The following is a list of vaginal mesh lawsuit states that do not have a 2 year statute of limitations. Kentucky, Louisiana and Tennessee have a one year statute of limitations.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits Statute Of Limitations
MDL – 2325, IN RE: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
MDL No. 2187 | In RE: CR Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
MDL – 2326 IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
MDL – 2327 IN RE: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
MDL – 2387 IN RE: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation
Cook Medical Surgical will be the 5th MDL
Vaginal mesh lawsuits are being accepted for all of the manufacturers listed above. Boston Scientific and AMS vaginal mesh cases have a unique advantage. If you have had your vaginal mesh implanted in a 2 year statute state and it is a Boston Scientific or AMS product the lawsuit can be moved to the state's of the mnaiufacturers. This is Minnesota and Massachusetts. These states have not reached the statute filing date as of yet.
Contact our vaginal mesh lawyers for more information on filing you vaginal mesh lawsuits for class action lawsuit against mesh.
Lipitor lawyers of Class Action Lawyer Network are filing lawsuits for women who are getting type 2 diabetis from lipitor.
Lipitor is prescribed to lower her cholesterol levels and help decrease the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. However, after using the medication many women are being d diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.
It appears Pfizer knew about the increased risk of diabetes from Lipitor, but failed to provide adequate warnings for women and their doctors.
Lipitor Is Causing Type 2 diabetes in women taking Lipitor
What Is Lipitor?
Lipitor (atorvastatin) is one of the most widely used brand-name medications in the United States. Millions of people take the medication to help lower cholesterol. Pfizer had more than $125 billion in Lipitor sales.
FDA Warning For Lipitor
In February 2012, the FDA required new diabetes warnings for Lipitor. This was due to the increased risk of changes to blood glucose levels.
Lipitor lawyers are filing Lipitor lawsuits
Mullti District Litigation Consolidation For Lipitor Lawsuits
U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) rejected a request filed by Lipitor lawyers to centralize all cases brought in the federal court system. The MDL panel has determined that each of the cases will proceed as individual lawsuits in the U.S. District Court where they were filed.More than half of the pending actions are already consolidated before one judge in the District of South Carolina.
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with Type II Diabetis after taking Lipitor contact us to speak toa Lipitor lawyer today.