Class Action Article

  • File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit: Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Talcum Powder Fallopian Tube Cancer Lawsuits Baby  Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Filed If you or a loved one used talcum powder products and were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, or fallopian tube can...

Class Action News

Drug Class Actions

  • Taxotere Lawyers for Permanent Hair Loss: Taxotere Baldness Lawyers For  Permanent Hair Loss Lawsuits Have you received Taxotere for breast cancer? Taxotere can result in hair loss or baldness  that is permanent. Taxotere  is a chemotherapy drug used for the treatment of breas...

Medical Device Lawsuits

  • Zimmer Hip Replacement Lawyers: Network Zimmer Hip Replacement  Lawyer Win $2 Million Against Zimmer Hip Replacement Do You Have A Faulty Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prothesis With Connective Technology and Cobalt Chromium Head? Do You Have Have Metallosis or Chromium Cobalt T...

File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class Action Articles, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Dallas, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Denver, Detroit, Fallopian tube cancer lawyer, File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida vaginal mesh lawsuit, Fort Lauderdale, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Hawaii Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Homedica Recall Lawsuits, Houston, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Talcum Powder Lawyer, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Johnson and Johnson Baby Powder Lawsuit, Kansas city, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Las Vegas, Little Rock Talcum Powder Lawyer, Louisiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Louisville, Macon, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Miami, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minneapolis, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NYC, NYC Class Action Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ovarian cancer lawyer, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Philadelphia, Philadelphia Baby powder lawyer, Phoenix, Provo, Raleigh-Durham, Reno, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Sarasota, Seattle, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, st louis, St Louis Talcum Powder lawyer, Talcum Powder cancer lawyers, Talcum Powder Ovarian cancer lawyer, Tennessee Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Palm Beach, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits

Talcum Powder Fallopian Tube Cancer Lawsuits

Baby  Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Filed

If you or a loved one used talcum powder products and were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, or fallopian tube cancer speak to one of our talcum powder lawyers. Lawsuits are being filed for women who used talcum powder products on or around the genital area for over five years and now have diagnosis of ovarian cancer or fallopian tube cancer.

What Talcum Powder  Products Are In Question?

Talcum powder products such as  Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower are suspect for causing both ovarian cancer and fallopian tube cancer in women,  These products have been used by women for decades to absorb moisture and for personal hygiene.

Can I File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit?

Women are filing talcum powder cancer  lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson for knowing about the possible risk of ovarian cancer and fallopian tube cancer with the use of their products.  They failed to warn doctors, women and the public. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with ovarian cancer or fallopian tube cancer after using these products you may be eligible to join other women in a products liability lawsuit.  Complete the form to see if you may qualify for joining the lawsuit.

Multi District Litigation Requested For Invokana

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Anaheim, Atlanta, Baltimore, Charleston, Charlotte, Class MDL Class Action News, Dallas, Denver, Fort Lauderdale, Houston, Invokana lawsuit, Invokana lawyer, Invokana Lawyers, Kansas city, Ketoacidosis Lawyer, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Louisville, Macon, Miami, Minneapolis, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NYC, NYC Class Action Lawyers, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Provo, Raleigh-Durham, Reno, Sarasota, Seattle, st louis, Toledo, West Palm Beach, Xarelto Lawyer, Xarelto Lawyers

A Multi District Litigation has been requested for the consolidation of the Invokana lawsuits by Invokana lawyers as lawsuits continue to increase. A consolidation is requested to facilitate proceeding under one judge and jurisdiction. The  lawsuits against the manufacturer of the diabetes drug Invokana are alleging serious injuries after taking Invokana, including heart attack, kidney damage and a dangerous blood condition known as ketoacidosis. The  lawsuits claim that  Johnson & Johnson and its  subsidiary Janssen failed to warn patients and doctors  about the risks of taking Invokana. Invokana lawyers filed a  motion on September 20 asking the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to  consolidate Invokana lawsuits. The formation of an MDL would transfer all cases to a single judge and jurisdiction. Invikana lawyers explained in the motion that the  FDA had received many reports of kidney damage as a result of patients taking Invokana, which led the FDA to issue a stronger  Invokana warning risk with a June 2016 label change. That warning was preceded by another label change in May 2015, alerting users to the risk of ketoacidosi. Ketoacidoasis can be a life-threatening condition that occurs when blood acids known as ketones reach dangerously high levels. Additional warnings were added to the label in August 2016, noting that fatal cases of ketoacidosis had been reported with Invokana use. What Is Invokana? Invokana is a diabetes drug in the   SGLT2 inhibitor category. It  regulate blood sugar levels by encouraging the body to eliminate extra glucose in urine. Consolidation has been requested for the  District Court of New Jersey in Trenton, where 36 of the Invokana lawsuits are already pending. All of those cases are before Judge Brian R. Martinotti, a federal judge the motion notes has extensive experience with complex litigation. If you or a loved one has  had a life threatening event due to Invokana call out Invokana Helpline today.  

Lawyers For Drugs and Devices

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in ABG II Lawyers, ABG Modular Stem lawyers, Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Asbestos, Baby Powder lawyer, Bair Hugger Surgical Blanket lawyer, Baltimore, Bard IVC Filter Lawyers, Blood Clot Filter lawyer, Boca Raton, Boston, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Charleston, Charlotte, Cincinnattti Talcum Powder lawyer, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Dallas, Denver, DePuy Pinnacle Hip Replacement Updates, Detroit, File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit, Fort Lauderdale, Fort Lauderdale GranuFlo Lawyer, GranuFlo Dialysis Medication Lawyers, Granuflo Lawyer, Heartbuen medication lawyer, Heartburn Medication lawyer, Houston, Idaho Talcum Powder Lawyer, Infuse Bone Graft Lawywrs, Invokana Lawyers, Johnson and Johnson Baby Powder Lawsuit, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Little Rock Talcum Powder Lawyer, Los Angeles, Louisville, Macon, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mass tort lawyer, Metronic Infuse Bone Graft Lawsuit, Miami, Minneapolis, NexGen Knee Replacement lawyers, NYC, NYC Class Action Lawyers, Philadelphia Amtrak Crash, Philadelphia Baby powder lawyer, Phoenix, Power Morcellator Lawyers, Provo, Raleigh-Durham, Risperdal Lawyers, Sarasota, Seattle, SSRI Birth Defects Lawyer, Stryker Hip replacement recall lawyer, Stryker Homedicam Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate Hip replacement recall lawyers, Talcum Powder cancer lawyers, Talcum Powder Ovarian cancer lawyer, Taxotere Lawyer, Toledo, Tylenol Liver Damage Lawsuits, West Palm Beach, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Xarelto Lawyer, Xarelto Lawyers, Zimmer Knee Replacement lawyer

Lawyers For Drugs & Devices Our Class Action – Dangerous Drugs and Devices Lawyers are accepting cases for :

Abilify lawyers- excessive gambling, Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawyers, Benicar Lawyers, Biomet Hip Replacement, da Vinci Robotic Surgery, Depakote, DePuy Hip Replacement, DePuy Knee Replacement, GranuFlo lawyers, Hip Replacement lawyers, INFUSE Bone Graft lawyers, Invokana lawyers, IVC Filters lawyers, Januvia lawyers, NaturaLyte lawyers, Nexium lawyers- kidney failure, Power Morcellators, Talcum Powder ovarian cancer lawyers, Taxotere permanent baldness lawyers, Testosterone heart attack lawyers, Xarelto excessive bleeding lawyers, Zofran birth defect lawyers

About Filing A Dangerous Drugs or Devices Lawsuit

All dangerous drug and devices lawsuits have specific criteria for acceptance of your case. You must meet the criteria. many of these drug and devices lawsuits have been consolidated in a multi-district litigation. The judge has set the criteria for the lawsuit. You will be asked specific questions regarding your medical history, date you were implanted with the device or began using the medication, and if you are still using the medication or have had the device removed or revised in any way. Contact us to speak to an experienced drug and devices lawyer. These cases can be accepted for your local jurisdiction but, more often, they will be filed in the state where the lawsuits have been consolidated. These mass tort consolidated cases have a steering committee which is made up of selected lawyers and lead counsels. They are the only lawyers that  will litigate the cases. You do not need a local lawyer. Most lawyers whi accept these cases refer them to an experienced mass tort lawyer who is not local. You need an experienced mass tort lawyer.

Power Morcellator Uterine Cancer Lawyers | Morcellator Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Anaheim, Atlanta, Baltimore, Biloxi, Boca Raton, Boston, Charleston, Charlotte, Denver, Detroit, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Fort Lauderdale, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Houston, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Los Angeles, Louisville, Macon, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Medical Device Lawsuits, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NYC, NYC Class Action Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Power Morcellator Lawyers, Provo, Raleigh-Durham, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Palm Beach, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Power Morcellator Lawyers Filing Lawsuits

Power Morcellator Device Spreads Uterine Cancer Continue To Grow

Morcellator lawyers advise that  power Morcellator lawsuits have been consolidated by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.  2652 cases have been filed for women who underwent laparoscopic power morcellation for hysterectomies or myomectomies and were put at  risk for spreading previously hidden cancer cells. The Facts
  1. The Morcellator   has jaw-like blades that rapidly spin to shred fibroid tissue so that the pieces are able to be removed from the body.
  2. It is now known that as  tool does this, it uncovers and disseminates uterine sarcoma cells.
  3. The FDA  issued a safety warning against laparoscopic power morcellation procedures  due to the risk of spreading cancer.
  4. Many women  have developed serious or fatal leiomyosarcoma.
  5. There have been  deaths of “hundreds, if not thousands of women in America”.
Morcellator lawyers at Class Action Lawyer Netowork are accepting cases for women  who have undergone power morcellation and who has subsequently been diagnosed with cancer.  

Zimmer NexGen Knee Replacement Class Action Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Hawaii Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Louisiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Medical Device Lawsuits, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NexGen Knee Replacement lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NYC Class Action Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Tennessee Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Zimmer Knee Replacement lawyer

NexGen Knee Replacement Lawyers For Failure And Complications

What  Are The Complications of Zimmer NexGen Knee Replacements?

 Early failure and replacement of the device
Loosening of artificial knee
Knee or joint pain
Popping, Fracture, Dislocation
Difficulty walking or standing

Defective Knee Replacement Attorney For Filing In The  NexGen MDL Class Action

MIS Tibial Components and the NexGen LPS-Flex GSF Femoral Component lawsuits,  have been consolidated in the U.S. District Court of Northern Illinois under the multidistrict litigation (MDL) case number 2272. Zimmer Manufacturing has recalled the NexGen MIS Tibial Component due to to one or more complications.

Devices In The NexGen MDL Class Action:
All NexGen MIS Total Knee Procedure Stemmed Tibial Components
NexGen Complete Knee Solution Cruciate Retaining-Flex Femoral Components (CR-Flex)
NexGen Complete Knee Solution Gender Solutions Female LPS-Flex (GSF LPS-Flex)
NexGen Complete Knee Solution Legacy Posterior Stabilized-Flex Femoral Components (LPS-Flex)
NexGen Complete Knee Solution CR-Flex Gender Solutions Female CR-Flex (GSF-Flex)

If you have a Zimmer NexGen knee replacement  and are experiencing complications  your doctor immediately to evaluate if the device is working properly.  You may need revision surgery. Speak to one of our NexGen knee replacement lawyers.

 

Stryker Lawsuit News And Updates, Stryker Lawyers, Rejuvinate, ABG II Modular Stems

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in ABG Modular Stem lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class Action Articles, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, DePuy Pinnacle Hip Replacement Updates, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Hawaii Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NYC Class Action Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Stryker Hip replacement recall lawyer, Stryker Homedicam Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate Hip replacement recall lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Stryker has recalled a number of hip replacements including: Stryker Rejuvinate, Stryker ABG II and the Trident. Lawsuits are being filed against Stryker for implant failure of all these devices

Stryker recalled its Trident artificial hip in 2007 due to device failures in recipients. Previous plaintiffs have cited symptoms consistent with other defective metal-on-metal hip implants, along with one defect that was unique to the Trident device: Many recipients claimed of hearing a loud squeaking noise coming from their hip region after receiving this particular model.

Stryker recalls on the Rejuvinate and ABG II will effect thousands and the lawsuits are coming in in mass. The FDA has taken another look and is proposing changes to regulations that allowed two Stryker Corp. recalled hip implant systems to be deemed safe. But the move does little for the tens of thousands of patients already implanted with the faulty medical devices. The DePuy Pinnacle and ASR are other failed recalled hip replacements that have injured thousands of victims.  The FDA proposed changes for the 510(k) Premarket Notification Process for  the approval of metal-on-metal hip implants like those manufactured by Stryker and DePuy come very late for seniors burdened with painful revision surgeries.

In July 2012, after injured patients filed more than 60 adverse event reports with the FDA, Stryker issued a voluntary recall of its ABG II and Rejuvenate hip implant systems. Post-market surveillance revealed that a metal-on-metal junction in these devices can shed metal debris, causing pain and tissue damage that may require a revision surgery. Can the FDA actually step up to the plate and protect our citizens?

The FDA’s most recent proposal aims to standardize the requirements for how the agency accepts data, regardless of the submission or application type. The new regulation will require 510(k) submissions to be scrutinized by an institutional review board (IRB), a must for PMA applications.

The proposal for better practices in approval of medical devices like hip implants would become effective 180 days after publication, and the proposal to shift from 510(k) to PMA for metal hips would become effective 90 days after publication. Lawyers for Stryker and Depuy hip replacements are filing lawsuits for failed devices.

Bellwether Trials Ready For 2013, Lawyers Filing Vaginal Mesh and DePuy Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class MDL Class Action News, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NYC Class Action Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

What is a Bellwether case?

It meets the needs of thousands of plaintiffs all injured by a particular product or group of products. The courts cannot handle thousands of trials. There is no other feasible way for the courts to handle this enormous caseload. The 2013 big bellwether cases going to trial are the  vaginal mesh and DePuy hip replacement. This approach has been used in many cases including asbestos, mesothelioma cases.. A group of plaintiffs are chosen to represent all the plaintiffs.  The verdicts from this group is  used for   the remaining plaintiffs’ cases. The actual results may be utilized for setting a value for  groups of claims in settlements. The plaintiffs can also choose to continue with their own individual trials with their own attorney.

Important Bellwether Trials for 2013

Vaginal Mesh

The first bellwether trials in the Transvaginal Mesh MDL (Multidistrict Litigations) are scheduled to start at the end of 2013.

A status conference for  five vaginal mesh implant lawsuit MDLs was called on December 6, 2012 to announce the first three bellwether trials that will begin in December of 2013. The U.S. District Judge that is overseeing the trials in the Southern District of West Virginia, Judge Joseph R. Goodwin, has scheduled the three bellwether trials which will involve three different vaginal mesh implant manufacturers as defendants.

  • American Medical Systems
  • Ethicon 
  • Boston Scientific.

These "bellwether" trials should give women, and attorneys, a better idea of the viability of their lawsuits and the basis for compensation. Four of the multi-district litigations (MDL) around the country will begin this year, with the earliest starting this month in New Jersey. Another MDL in West Virginia is set to begin in February.

With thousands of women injured by these malfunctioning mesh implants a group of plaintiffs are chosen to represent all the plaintiffs

DePuy Hip Replacement

The first DePuy Hip Replacement  trial  is scheduled to begin on Monday, January 7, 2013, in Prince George's Maryland Circuit Court. The trial is expected to last three weeks, according to court documents. (Jackson, et al. v. Chesapeake Surgical Ltd., et al., CAL 10-32147)

Judge David Katz of the U.S. District Court, District of Northern Ohio has scheduled the first bellwether trials in the DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. ASR Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation(MDL No. 2197) for May 6, 2013 and July 8, 2013.

Mirena IUD Having Severe Complications in Women, Perforated Uterus

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class MDL Class Action News, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Louisiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Medical Device Lawsuits, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mirena IUD Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NYC Class Action Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Tennessee Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Criteria for the Mirena lawsuit is a perforated Uterus.

The lawyers of Class Action Lawyer Network are reviewing cases for  perforated Uterus from the Mirnena IUD and gathering facts for the formation of a Mult district litigation action. Women implanted with the Mirena IUD are having serious side effects. The most serious is e gravitation of the IUD to a nearby organ causing it to become embedded in the Uterus or other organ. Organ perforation is another hazard of this gravitation. This is the only criteria right now for the Mirena lawsuits.

Lawyers are seeking all women with organ perforation from the Mirena IUD to submit theor medical records and documentation to be reviewed for a Mirena IUD lawsuit against the Mirena manufacturer.

Serious Side Effects of The Mirena IUD

The numbers of women are starting to grow who have had Mirena implanted and are experiencing serious and even debilitating or life-threatening side-effects. The device has been migrating from its original position after being inserted, perforating the uterus or embedding itself in the uterus. In both instances, a doctor must locate and surgically remove the device. Mirena also migrates outside the uterine cavity and cause adhesions or scarring that can lead to infertility. Depending on the damage caused, you may require a complete hysterectomy, and more serious complications could result in death. You must be aware of any and all changes when you have this device and see an emergency physician immediately if you are experiencing any symptoms.

Be Alerted to the following side effects:

  •     Abscesses
  •     Embedment in the uterus
  •     Erosion of adjacent areas such as the vagina
  •     Infertility
  •     Inflammation of the membrane that lines the abdominal cavity and internal organs (Peritonitis)
  •     Intestinal perforations or obstruction
  •     Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
  •     Perforation of the uterus

Contact us for a Mirena IUD case review.