Class Action Article

  • File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit: Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Talcum Powder Fallopian Tube Cancer Lawsuits Baby  Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Filed If you or a loved one used talcum powder products and were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, or fallopian tube can...

Class Action News

Drug Class Actions

  • Taxotere Lawyers for Permanent Hair Loss: Taxotere Baldness Lawyers For  Permanent Hair Loss Lawsuits Have you received Taxotere for breast cancer? Taxotere can result in hair loss or baldness  that is permanent. Taxotere  is a chemotherapy drug used for the treatment of breas...

Medical Device Lawsuits

  • Zimmer Hip Replacement Lawyers: Network Zimmer Hip Replacement  Lawyer Win $2 Million Against Zimmer Hip Replacement Do You Have A Faulty Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prothesis With Connective Technology and Cobalt Chromium Head? Do You Have Have Metallosis or Chromium Cobalt T...

Lawyers For Drugs and Devices

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in ABG II Lawyers, ABG Modular Stem lawyers, Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Asbestos, Baby Powder lawyer, Bair Hugger Surgical Blanket lawyer, Baltimore, Bard IVC Filter Lawyers, Blood Clot Filter lawyer, Boca Raton, Boston, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Charleston, Charlotte, Cincinnattti Talcum Powder lawyer, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Dallas, Denver, DePuy Pinnacle Hip Replacement Updates, Detroit, File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit, Fort Lauderdale, Fort Lauderdale GranuFlo Lawyer, GranuFlo Dialysis Medication Lawyers, Granuflo Lawyer, Heartbuen medication lawyer, Heartburn Medication lawyer, Houston, Idaho Talcum Powder Lawyer, Infuse Bone Graft Lawywrs, Invokana Lawyers, Johnson and Johnson Baby Powder Lawsuit, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Little Rock Talcum Powder Lawyer, Los Angeles, Louisville, Macon, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mass tort lawyer, Metronic Infuse Bone Graft Lawsuit, Miami, Minneapolis, NexGen Knee Replacement lawyers, NYC, NYC Class Action Lawyers, Philadelphia Amtrak Crash, Philadelphia Baby powder lawyer, Phoenix, Power Morcellator Lawyers, Provo, Raleigh-Durham, Risperdal Lawyers, Sarasota, Seattle, SSRI Birth Defects Lawyer, Stryker Hip replacement recall lawyer, Stryker Homedicam Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate Hip replacement recall lawyers, Talcum Powder cancer lawyers, Talcum Powder Ovarian cancer lawyer, Taxotere Lawyer, Toledo, Tylenol Liver Damage Lawsuits, West Palm Beach, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Xarelto Lawyer, Xarelto Lawyers, Zimmer Knee Replacement lawyer

Lawyers For Drugs & Devices Our Class Action – Dangerous Drugs and Devices Lawyers are accepting cases for :

Abilify lawyers- excessive gambling, Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawyers, Benicar Lawyers, Biomet Hip Replacement, da Vinci Robotic Surgery, Depakote, DePuy Hip Replacement, DePuy Knee Replacement, GranuFlo lawyers, Hip Replacement lawyers, INFUSE Bone Graft lawyers, Invokana lawyers, IVC Filters lawyers, Januvia lawyers, NaturaLyte lawyers, Nexium lawyers- kidney failure, Power Morcellators, Talcum Powder ovarian cancer lawyers, Taxotere permanent baldness lawyers, Testosterone heart attack lawyers, Xarelto excessive bleeding lawyers, Zofran birth defect lawyers

About Filing A Dangerous Drugs or Devices Lawsuit

All dangerous drug and devices lawsuits have specific criteria for acceptance of your case. You must meet the criteria. many of these drug and devices lawsuits have been consolidated in a multi-district litigation. The judge has set the criteria for the lawsuit. You will be asked specific questions regarding your medical history, date you were implanted with the device or began using the medication, and if you are still using the medication or have had the device removed or revised in any way. Contact us to speak to an experienced drug and devices lawyer. These cases can be accepted for your local jurisdiction but, more often, they will be filed in the state where the lawsuits have been consolidated. These mass tort consolidated cases have a steering committee which is made up of selected lawyers and lead counsels. They are the only lawyers that  will litigate the cases. You do not need a local lawyer. Most lawyers whi accept these cases refer them to an experienced mass tort lawyer who is not local. You need an experienced mass tort lawyer.

Stryker Hip Replacement Lawsuits, Patients Are Being Contacted To Accept A Revision Surgery Payoff.

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in ABG II Lawyers, ABG Modular Stem lawyers, APG II, APG II Lawyers, APG II Recall Lawyers, Class Action Articles, Stryker Homedicam Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate Hip replacement recall lawyers

Have You Been Contacted By A Representative  Company Offering To Pay For Your Hip Implant Revision Surgery?

Speak to a Stryker lawyer first. The offer is very specific and uses two very important words. They are "if necessary". We do not know what the definition and criteria of "if necessary" is.

Stryker Hip Implant Lawsuits Have Been Consolidated In A Massive Litigation

Lawsuits filed in U.S. District Courts against hip implant maker Stryker Corporation over the recalled Rejuvenate and ABG II hip components have been consolidated in Minnesota in a  multidistrict litigation, or MDL.  This order took effect  June 12, 2013 when the federal Judicial Panel on Multidistrct Litigation ordered 41 Stryker hip lawsuits from 16 different federal districts to be consolidated under the the Honorable Judge Donovan W. Frank.(In Re: Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2441) for
Stryker hip implants.

Many More Lawsuits Are Anticipated

This  consolidation may also encourage Stryker lawsuit settlements. All recipients of a Stryker ABG II Modular Stems or Rejuvinate hip implant needing revision surgery are advised to file their Stryker Hip Replacement Lawsuit.

Have you received a recall letter from Stryker?

Have you been told you need revision surgery?

Have you already gotten revision surgery?

Speak to one of our Stryker Hip Replacement lawyers today before accepting any offers or signing anuy paperwork.

Stryker Lawsuit News And Updates, Stryker Lawyers, Rejuvinate, ABG II Modular Stems

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in ABG Modular Stem lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class Action Articles, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, DePuy Pinnacle Hip Replacement Updates, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Hawaii Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NYC Class Action Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Stryker Hip replacement recall lawyer, Stryker Homedicam Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate Hip replacement recall lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Stryker has recalled a number of hip replacements including: Stryker Rejuvinate, Stryker ABG II and the Trident. Lawsuits are being filed against Stryker for implant failure of all these devices

Stryker recalled its Trident artificial hip in 2007 due to device failures in recipients. Previous plaintiffs have cited symptoms consistent with other defective metal-on-metal hip implants, along with one defect that was unique to the Trident device: Many recipients claimed of hearing a loud squeaking noise coming from their hip region after receiving this particular model.

Stryker recalls on the Rejuvinate and ABG II will effect thousands and the lawsuits are coming in in mass. The FDA has taken another look and is proposing changes to regulations that allowed two Stryker Corp. recalled hip implant systems to be deemed safe. But the move does little for the tens of thousands of patients already implanted with the faulty medical devices. The DePuy Pinnacle and ASR are other failed recalled hip replacements that have injured thousands of victims.  The FDA proposed changes for the 510(k) Premarket Notification Process for  the approval of metal-on-metal hip implants like those manufactured by Stryker and DePuy come very late for seniors burdened with painful revision surgeries.

In July 2012, after injured patients filed more than 60 adverse event reports with the FDA, Stryker issued a voluntary recall of its ABG II and Rejuvenate hip implant systems. Post-market surveillance revealed that a metal-on-metal junction in these devices can shed metal debris, causing pain and tissue damage that may require a revision surgery. Can the FDA actually step up to the plate and protect our citizens?

The FDA’s most recent proposal aims to standardize the requirements for how the agency accepts data, regardless of the submission or application type. The new regulation will require 510(k) submissions to be scrutinized by an institutional review board (IRB), a must for PMA applications.

The proposal for better practices in approval of medical devices like hip implants would become effective 180 days after publication, and the proposal to shift from 510(k) to PMA for metal hips would become effective 90 days after publication. Lawyers for Stryker and Depuy hip replacements are filing lawsuits for failed devices.

Stryker Hip Replacement Lawsuit Urgent Message, Broadspire Claims

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in ABG II Lawyers, APG II, APG II Lawyers, APG II Recall Lawyers, Stryker Hip replacement recall lawyer, Stryker Homedicam Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate Hip replacement recall lawyers

Stryker is reaching out to victims of their Rejuvinate and ABG II Hip replacements thru Broadspire Services Inc. Beware and contact a Stryker Hip Replacement lawyer immediately. It is best to have a retained lawyer as these cases will be part of a nationwide  MDL ( multi distrcit litigation ) hip replacement lawsuit just like the DePuy Pinnacle and many others. Stryker says "“Stryker will be reimbursing patients for testing, treatment, revision surgery; if necessary; and other costs relating to this voluntary recall.” But this is vague and unclear and by accepting this you may lose your oppoertunity for a settlement once these are negotiated by Stryker lawyers. Stryker is not on your side.

Stryker Broadspire Contacts For Medical Expenses

You may have recently received a Stryker letter from a doctor informing you that Broadspire Services, Inc. had been retained to handle claims for patient expenses related to the Stryker Rejuvenate recall. According to information on Stryker’s website, “Stryker will be reimbursing patients for testing, treatment, revision surgery, if necessary, and other costs relating to this voluntary recall.” Stryker has also directed doctors to inform their patients that Broadspire would be working directly with patients on their claims, and to contact Stryker for more information. You should keep in mind that any information you disclose during the Stryker Broadspire claims process, or to a Broadspire representative, could dramatically effect  your Stryker hip recall lawsuit settlement.  You should speak to a Stryker  lawyer before you contact Broadspire, and especially before you agree to or sign anything. This is extremely important.

Many seniors do not understand the process and are easily coerced. They are vulnerable and concerned about medical care. You should speak to an experienced Stryker Hip Replacement lawyer.