Class Action Article

  • File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit: Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Talcum Powder Fallopian Tube Cancer Lawsuits Baby  Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Filed If you or a loved one used talcum powder products and were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, or fallopian tube can...

Class Action News

Drug Class Actions

  • Taxotere Lawyers for Permanent Hair Loss: Taxotere Baldness Lawyers For  Permanent Hair Loss Lawsuits Have you received Taxotere for breast cancer? Taxotere can result in hair loss or baldness  that is permanent. Taxotere  is a chemotherapy drug used for the treatment of breas...

Medical Device Lawsuits

  • Zimmer Hip Replacement Lawyers: Network Zimmer Hip Replacement  Lawyer Win $2 Million Against Zimmer Hip Replacement Do You Have A Faulty Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prothesis With Connective Technology and Cobalt Chromium Head? Do You Have Have Metallosis or Chromium Cobalt T...

Posts Tagged ‘Anaheim’

Hip Replacement Helpline Launched

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Biomet Hip Replacement lawyers, DePuyPinnacle- ASR Hip Replacement lawyers, encore hip replacement lawyers, Medical Device Lawsuits, Omnilife Hip Replacement lawyers, Smith amd Nephew Hip Replacement Lawyers, Wright hip Replacement lawyers

Hip Replacement Lawsuits

Many of the Hip replacement  manufacturers of the metal-on-metal hip implants have recalled their implants for functional defects.  There have been settlement offers on hip replacements for victims of a faulty hip implant or cobalt and chromium poisoning to the blood stream.

Hip Replacement Revision Surgery Lawsuits

Hip replacement or revision surgery is one of the most common orthopedic  procedures performed in the United States.  There have been numerous defective implants placed on the market resulting in needles pain, suffering and revision surgeries

Get A Hip Replacement Lawyer

Below is a  list of cases our hip replacement lawyers   will take a look at.

  1. Stryker Rejuvenate Modular Neck Cases – All
  2. Stryker ABG II Modular neck Cases – All
  3. Stryker Accolade (TMZF) Stem cases with Cobalt Chromium modular heads. These stems have the potential for significant head neck corrosion – All cases with Metallosis.
  4. Wright Medical Conserve Cup (MOM) cases – ALL
  5. Wright Medical Profemur Stem Cases (this is their modular neck design)- These cases are prone to Fracture (either the titanium or CoCr necks) and Metallosis. ALL.
  6. Depuy ASR – ALL
  7. Depuy Pinnacle Metal on Metal (MOM) with modular heads greater than 36 mm.
  8. Zimmer Durom Cup cases with modular heads greater than 36 mm.
  9.  Zimmer M/L Taper Kinectiv Stem cases (this is their Modular neck design)- All cases with Metallosis.
  10.  Biomet M2A 38mm / Magnum MOM cases. ALL cases with Metallosis.
  11.  DJO / Encore MOM hip cases. All cases revised due to Metallosis.
  12.  Omnilife Apex Arc – This is a smaller manufacturer but this device is a mixed metal modular neck device. ALL
  13.  Smith & Nephew R3 (MOM) cup cases. Only cases that have metallosis and were revised or need a revision.
  14. Smith & Nephew SMF stem (this is their mixed metal modular neck product). We have not seen many of these yet but, our hip replacement lawyers are interested in them.

Knee Replacement Lawyers For Knee Replacement Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Smith & Nephew's OXINIUM devices lawyer, Stryker’s Scorpio implant lawyers, Zimmer’s NexGen Natural Knee System implant lawyers

Knee replacement lawsuits are being filed for
  • Zimmer’s NexGen Natural Knee System implant lawyers,
  • Stryker’s Scorpio implant lawyers,
  • Smith & Nephew’s OXINIUM devices lawyer.

Knee Replacement Complications

Complications Lawsuits are Being Filed For: Persistent pain, swelling or stiffness, Deep vein thrombosis, Implant failure within five years, Nerve injuries, Fracturing, chipping and migration and Infections.

Brand Knee Replacements Lawsuit Filings

Knee Replacements Causing Problems Include: DePuy knee, Zimmer NexGen LPS, CR and MIS, Natural Knee System, Stryker Scorpio CR and PS components, Duracon Total Knee, Unicompartmental Knee System, Smith & Nephew Oxinium Genesis II and Profix II, Journey Uni Tibial Baseplate, and Biomet Vanguard CR.

Knee Replacement Recalls

Has your  knee replacement caused debilitating side effects? Have you needed  to undergo revision surgery  to fix or replace the device or to correct complications caused by the device?

Complications  resulting  in a  knee replacement recall include:

Persistent pain of recipient, Infection or drainage, Swelling or inflammation, Damage to surrounding bone, muscle, or nerves

Zimmer NexGen Knee Recalls

While there has not been a total recall on any Zimmer NexGen knee replacement devices, a number of device components have been recalled. In 2010, Zimmer NexGen MIS Tibial Components were recalled due to high incidences of failure associated with the components. The Zimmer NexGen LPS-Flex GSF Femoral Component was also recalled due to evidence of loosening. Additionally, the Zimmer Natural-Knee II Durasul Patella faces a Class II recall. This component is not part of the Zimmer NexGen product line.

Zimmer Recalls

Zimmer NexGen knee recalled components include: NexGen MIS Tibial Components,NexGen TM Tibial Trays, NexGen LPS-Flex GSF Femoral Component, NexGen MIS Modular Tibial Plates and Keels.

Stryker Knee Replacement Recalls

In April 2013, the FDA issued a Class I recall of Stryker’s ShapeMatch Cutting Guide.  The Guides help to position knee replacement components and guide the marking of the patient’s bone prior to cutting. In November 2012, Stryker acknowledged manufacturing defects in the ShapeMatch Cutting Guide and instructed surgeons to discontinue use. This knee replacement recall was because  the software has a defect that causes wider cutting ranges. As a result, knee replacement patients may experience severe complications such as instability of the joint, fracture, chronic pain, and mobility limitations. Patients may also require the need for revision surgery.

Other Knee Replacement Recalls

StrykerDuracon Total Knee, Unicompartmental Knee System, Scorpio PS and CR components, BiometVanguard CR, Smith & Nephew Journey Uni Tibial Baseplate, Oxinium Genesis II and Profix II

Get a Knee Replacement Lawyer

Bard IVC Filter Lawyers | Bard Inferior Vena Cava Filter Alert

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Bard IVC Filter Lawyers, Cook IVC Filter Lawyer, Medical Device Lawsuits

File A Bard IVC Filer Lawsuit For A Failed Bard Inferior Vena Cava Filter

Bard IVC Filter Dangers

Bard  IVC Filters have  certain dangers. The filters can fracture and pieces can migrate and perforate various organs in the body.  Inferior Vena Cava filters are implanted to capture blood clots before they can settle in the brain or lungs resulting in a pulmonary embolism or stroke.

Bard IVC Filter Lawyers Filing Inferior Vena Cava Lawsuits For a Failed

  • Bard Recovery filter;
  • Bard G2 filter;
  • Bard G2 Express filter;
  • Cook Gunther Tulip

Vena Cava Filter Lawsuits Filed

What are the Complications Of The Bard  IVC Filters?

Fracture of the Cook  IVC Filter, Bard IVC Filter Migration, Perforation, Puncture or Serious Damage to the Heart, Lungs or Vena Cava, Internal Bleeding, Hematoma or Nerve Injury at the Puncture Site of the Bard IVC Filter, Inferior Vena Cava Filter related Pulmonary Embolism, Respiratory Distress From the IVC Filter, Infection from the IVC Filter, Shortness of Breath, Death

Get a Bard Inferior Vena Cava Filter Lawyer   File Your Bard  IVC Filter Lawsuit

Class Action Lawyer Network Lawyers Filing TRESemme Naturals Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

TRESemmé Naturals” Shampoos and Conditioners Class Action Lawsuit  Underway

Class Action Lawyer Network  seeking California residents interested in joining the TRESemme Naturals class action

Class Action Lawyer Network Lawyers Filing Tresemme Naturals Lawsuits

In August 2013, a class action lawsuit was filed against Unilever United States, Inc. for allegedly falsely advertising the “TRESemmé Naturals” shampoos and conditioners as “natural” when the products actually contain synthetic ingredients. (Cohen et al. v. Unilever United States, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-05162, D. NJ.).

Class Action Lawyers  Are Investigating Representations  Made by Unilever

Class Action Lawyers  are investigating representations being made by Unilever United States, Inc. concerning the "TRESemme Naturals" line of shampoos and conditioners.  The Naturals line is marketed and advertised with a campaign that is centered around the representation that these products are "Natural."  These advertisements may be misleading to consumers because the Naturals line contains numerous synthetic ingredients, including a chemical known to release formaldehyde, that are not "Natural."  Unilever also claims you will have 10x stronger hair after just one use of the shampoo or conditioner, and does not appear to have research that can substantiate this claim. 

Tresemme Naturals, Not So Natural After All

Despite the 'natural' label on some TRESemme products, they actually contain a long list of unnatural ingredients, the TRESemme lawsuit claims. According to the class action lawsuit, the products contain allegedly unnatural ingredients, including ammonium laureth sulfate, DMDM hydantoin and dipropylene glycol. Cohen accuses Unilever of engaging in false and misleading advertising, with the knowledge that consumers would willingly pay a premium for products they believe to be natural.

If you are interested in joining this class action call Class Action lawyer Network today.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit MdL’s, Vaginal Mesh Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class MDL Class Action News, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

The vaginal mesh lawsuits may well be one of the largest ligigations of a hrmful device hurting women we have seen to date.

If is currently thought that over 300,000 women are implanted with various vaginal mesh devices for uterus, bladder and bowel prolapse as well as urinary incontinence. The mesh has caused very serious complications and the numbers of filings continue to grow.

Transvaginal mesh side effects are so common, in fact, that hundreds of lawsuits have been filed by women seeking compensation for their pain and suffering, medical bills, and lost wages due to vaginal mesh complications. The number of vaginal mesh lawsuits being filed is so large that five MDLs have been created to quickly and effectively deal with them. Four vaginal mesh MDLs have been centralized in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, while a fifth MDL has been created in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia.

There are a number of vaginal mesh MDL's currently

Vaginal mesh lawyers representing Plaintiffs argue that even with five vaginal mesh lawsuit MDLs, there is still a need to create a sixth MDL. Federal judges will meet later this month to hear oral arguments regarding whether a new vaginal mesh lawsuit MDL should be created in West Virginia, where U.S. District Judge Joseph R. Goodwin is overseeing five transvaginal mesh MDLs.

Discovery to begin for vaginal mesh lawsuits

Unsurprisingly, discovery is the process of “discovering” information or evidence to support a case. For the vaginal mesh multidistrict litigation, the pretrial discovery process will include interrogatories (fact-finding questionnaires), depositions, and the collection of other paperwork and information to support the plaintiffs’ cases. Judge Goodwin’s issuance of this order is an important step to moving forward with the MDL’s, as it signals the next step toward the first transvaginal mesh lawsuit trials.

The multi district litigation department of Class Action Lawyer Network has authorized an expanded division to continue to help women file vaginal mesh lawsuits for the pain and suffering they have undegone from these failed mesh devices.

This division is headed up by a female medical social worker who is is felt is best equipped to deal with women in crisis from the vaginal mesh. Women need support as well as help finding a doctor and is felt this is best handled by our social work team.

For nationwide mesh lawsuit representation contact us today.



Dangerous Devices Harming Women, Vaginal Mesh Lawyers File Mesh Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Medical Device Lawsuits, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Tennessee Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Transvaginal mesh, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Vaginal mesh lawyers are filing lawsuits the vaginal mesh and bladder sling. These prolene mesh devices have been used  and surgically implanted in over 300,000 women and severe complications are being reported. The vaginal mesh lawyers demand justice and are filing lawsuits on behalf of these thousands of injured women nationwide. We are filing mesh lawsuits in L.A, Houston, Dallas, NYC, Phiiadelphia, Baltimore, Detroit, Chicago, San Fransisco, Miami, Jacksonville, Atlanta, Los Angeles, Phoenix, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas, San Jose, Indianapolis, Austin, Columbus, Fort Worth, Charlotte, El Paso, Memphis, Boston, Seattle, D.C. Nashville, Denver, Milwaukee, Portland, Las Vegas, Oklahoma City, Albuquerque, Tucson, Fresno,Sacramento,Long Beach,Kansas City, Mesa, Virginia Beach,Colorado Springs, Omaha, Cleveland, Tulsa, Oakland, Minneapoplis, Wichita, Arlington and just about every city in the United States; even Alaska and Hawaii.

Women are suffering and husbands and families are suffering along with them, The vaginal mesh lawsuits being filed by our mesh lawyers  are multi-deistrct litigations, not  class actions. That means that the cases are assigned to certain jurisdictions in the country. The current largest mesh lawsuit filings are in West Virginia and New Jersey.

There are approximately 11 manufacturers involved in the vaginal mesh lawsuits. The primary  ones are: Johnson and Johnson, Bard, Boston Scientific and American medical Systems. To start the mesh lawsuit process contact our vaginal mesh lawyers today. Our mesh hotline is open 24hr, 7days.

If you have a vaginal mesh implant with complications from these manufacturers call us to learn your rights in the vaginal mesh lawsuit.

  •     AMS Elevate Prolapse Repair System
  •     AMS Apogee Vault Suspension System
  •     AMS Perigee System
  •     AMS Monarc Sling System
  •     AMS Sparc Sling System
  •     Bard Avaulta Support System
  •     Boston Scientific Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair Kit
  •     Boston Scientific Uphold Vaginal Support System
  •     Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh
  •     Ethicon Gynecare Prolene Soft Mesh
  •     Ethicon Gynecare Prolift Pelvic Floor Repair System
  •     Ethicon Gynecare TVT Transvaginal Sling
  •     UGYTEX Dual Knit Mesh
  •     Coviden IVS Tunneler Sling


Call now, Vaginal Mesh representatives are here to take your call and foward it to a mesh lawyer for respone.