Posts Tagged ‘Arlington’
Stryker V40 Taper Hip Replacement Lawyers Stryker Hip Replacement LawyersHip Implant lawyers are filing hip replacement lawsuits for V40 Femoral head failure in the Stryker Hip Implant. In August 2016, Stryker contacted implanting physicians about metal wear associated with its V40 Taper when used with some cobalt chromium heads.Stryker Orthopaedics sent an Urgent Medical Device Recall Notification to orthopedic surgeons. The recall involves certain sizes of LIFT™ Anatomic CoCr V40™ Femoral Heads manufactured prior to 2011. If you had a LIFT- V40 Femoral Head implanted during total hip replacement, you should be watching for a letter from your surgeon in the next few weeks. You may also be getting a letter from Stryker or a company hired by Stryker to handle claims.
Stryker Recall Metal V 40 Femoral Heads LawsuitsStryker has voluntarily recalled some of their metal V40 femoral heads used with hip implants. Stryker hip replacement lawyers are interested in speaking to anyone with a failed: Exeter, Citation, Meridian, Reliance, Definition, Restoration, Accolade Rejuvenate ABG 2 stems.
This failure may be due to the problems with the V40 femoral head.The failure of these heads is caused by corrosion and metal debris at the junction between the metal head and neck. The clinical results for patients include pain, loss of mobility, ambulation problems and an inability to work. Poisoning of the soft tissue, muscle and bone are the cause. Revision surgeries may be needed due to premature failures. Stryker lawyers are seeking patients with LFit V40 femoral heads made before 2011.
What Is The Femoral Head Problem?This is a ball for total hip replacements that can be attached to hip stems, including the Accolade TMZF, Accolade 2, Meridian, and Citation. There have been numerous incidents of taper lock failures on LFit V40 femoral heads made before 2011, This taper lock connects the “ball” part of the hip joint to the hip stem that is inserted in the femur. When it breaks the femoral head will detach from the femoral neck.
Get A Stryker Hip Implant LawyerOur Stryker Hip Replacement lawyers are currently accepting Stryker LFit V40 failure cases.
Hip Replacement LawsuitsMany of the Hip replacement manufacturers of the metal-on-metal hip implants have recalled their implants for functional defects. There have been settlement offers on hip replacements for victims of a faulty hip implant or cobalt and chromium poisoning to the blood stream.
Hip Replacement Revision Surgery LawsuitsHip replacement or revision surgery is one of the most common orthopedic procedures performed in the United States. There have been numerous defective implants placed on the market resulting in needles pain, suffering and revision surgeries
Get A Hip Replacement Lawyer
Below is a list of cases our hip replacement lawyers will take a look at.
- Stryker Rejuvenate Modular Neck Cases – All
- Stryker ABG II Modular neck Cases – All
- Stryker Accolade (TMZF) Stem cases with Cobalt Chromium modular heads. These stems have the potential for significant head neck corrosion – All cases with Metallosis.
- Wright Medical Conserve Cup (MOM) cases – ALL
- Wright Medical Profemur Stem Cases (this is their modular neck design)- These cases are prone to Fracture (either the titanium or CoCr necks) and Metallosis. ALL.
- Depuy ASR – ALL
- Depuy Pinnacle Metal on Metal (MOM) with modular heads greater than 36 mm.
- Zimmer Durom Cup cases with modular heads greater than 36 mm.
- Zimmer M/L Taper Kinectiv Stem cases (this is their Modular neck design)- All cases with Metallosis.
- Biomet M2A 38mm / Magnum MOM cases. ALL cases with Metallosis.
- DJO / Encore MOM hip cases. All cases revised due to Metallosis.
- Omnilife Apex Arc – This is a smaller manufacturer but this device is a mixed metal modular neck device. ALL
- Smith & Nephew R3 (MOM) cup cases. Only cases that have metallosis and were revised or need a revision.
- Smith & Nephew SMF stem (this is their mixed metal modular neck product). We have not seen many of these yet but, our hip replacement lawyers are interested in them.
- Zimmer’s NexGen Natural Knee System implant lawyers,
- Stryker’s Scorpio implant lawyers,
- Smith & Nephew’s OXINIUM devices lawyer.
Knee Replacement ComplicationsComplications Lawsuits are Being Filed For: Persistent pain, swelling or stiffness, Deep vein thrombosis, Implant failure within five years, Nerve injuries, Fracturing, chipping and migration and Infections.
Brand Knee Replacements Lawsuit FilingsKnee Replacements Causing Problems Include: DePuy knee, Zimmer NexGen LPS, CR and MIS, Natural Knee System, Stryker Scorpio CR and PS components, Duracon Total Knee, Unicompartmental Knee System, Smith & Nephew Oxinium Genesis II and Profix II, Journey Uni Tibial Baseplate, and Biomet Vanguard CR.
Knee Replacement RecallsHas your knee replacement caused debilitating side effects? Have you needed to undergo revision surgery to fix or replace the device or to correct complications caused by the device?
Complications resulting in a knee replacement recall include:Persistent pain of recipient, Infection or drainage, Swelling or inflammation, Damage to surrounding bone, muscle, or nerves
Zimmer NexGen Knee RecallsWhile there has not been a total recall on any Zimmer NexGen knee replacement devices, a number of device components have been recalled. In 2010, Zimmer NexGen MIS Tibial Components were recalled due to high incidences of failure associated with the components. The Zimmer NexGen LPS-Flex GSF Femoral Component was also recalled due to evidence of loosening. Additionally, the Zimmer Natural-Knee II Durasul Patella faces a Class II recall. This component is not part of the Zimmer NexGen product line.
Zimmer RecallsZimmer NexGen knee recalled components include: NexGen MIS Tibial Components,NexGen TM Tibial Trays, NexGen LPS-Flex GSF Femoral Component, NexGen MIS Modular Tibial Plates and Keels.
Stryker Knee Replacement RecallsIn April 2013, the FDA issued a Class I recall of Stryker’s ShapeMatch Cutting Guide. The Guides help to position knee replacement components and guide the marking of the patient’s bone prior to cutting. In November 2012, Stryker acknowledged manufacturing defects in the ShapeMatch Cutting Guide and instructed surgeons to discontinue use. This knee replacement recall was because the software has a defect that causes wider cutting ranges. As a result, knee replacement patients may experience severe complications such as instability of the joint, fracture, chronic pain, and mobility limitations. Patients may also require the need for revision surgery.
Other Knee Replacement RecallsStrykerDuracon Total Knee, Unicompartmental Knee System, Scorpio PS and CR components, BiometVanguard CR, Smith & Nephew Journey Uni Tibial Baseplate, Oxinium Genesis II and Profix II
Get a Knee Replacement Lawyer
Bard IVC Filter DangersBard IVC Filters have certain dangers. The filters can fracture and pieces can migrate and perforate various organs in the body. Inferior Vena Cava filters are implanted to capture blood clots before they can settle in the brain or lungs resulting in a pulmonary embolism or stroke.
Bard IVC Filter Lawyers Filing Inferior Vena Cava Lawsuits For a Failed
- Bard Recovery filter;
- Bard G2 filter;
- Bard G2 Express filter;
- Cook Gunther Tulip
Vena Cava Filter Lawsuits Filed
What are the Complications Of The Bard IVC Filters?Fracture of the Cook IVC Filter, Bard IVC Filter Migration, Perforation, Puncture or Serious Damage to the Heart, Lungs or Vena Cava, Internal Bleeding, Hematoma or Nerve Injury at the Puncture Site of the Bard IVC Filter, Inferior Vena Cava Filter related Pulmonary Embolism, Respiratory Distress From the IVC Filter, Infection from the IVC Filter, Shortness of Breath, Death
Get a Bard Inferior Vena Cava Filter Lawyer File Your Bard IVC Filter Lawsuit
Get A Texas Vena Cava Filter Lawyer
IVC Filter Lawyers
Blood Clot Filter LawyerDallas, Houston, Abilene, Amarillo, Austin, Arlington, Beaumont, Brownsville, College Station, Corpus Chrisit, Del Rio, Denton, EL Paso, Fort Worth, Galveston, Houston, Huntsville, Killeen, Laredo, Lubbock, Mcallen, Odessa, San Antonio, San Marcos, Tylor, Victoria, Waco, and Wichita Falls Vena Cava Filter, Blood Clot Filter, IVC Filter Lawyers.
What Is A Blood Clot Filter?The Vena Cava Filters are implanted in patients to capture blood clots before they can become lodged in the brain or lungs. This is used for patients who cannot tolerate blood thinners. The blood clot is captured to avoid traveling and causing a stroke or pulmonary embolism.
Manufacturers IVC Filters Lawsuits Being FiledMDL’s or multi district litigations have been formed for both the Bard and Cook IVC Filters
C.R. Bard IVC Filters
- Recovery IVC Filter (withdrawn in 2005),
- G2 IVC Filter,
- G2 Express,
- G2X Filter,
Cook IVC Filters
- Günther Tulip,
Other Retrievable IVC Filters
- B. Braun TempoFilter IVC filter,
- B. Braun VenaTech,
- Rex Medical (Argon Medical) Option IVC filter,
- ALN Optional Vena Cava Filter,
- Crux Vena Cava Filter (VCF)-
Blood Clot Filter DangersBlood clot filters have serious side effects including vein and organ perforation, migration and breakage. Broken pieces of the Blood Clot Filters can travel through the body, damaging organs.
These Severe Injuries Can Result In:Death, Hemorrhaging, Pulmonary Embolism, Stroke,
IVC Filter Lawsuits Are Being FiledIf you are a victim of an IVC Filter with serious or life threatening side effects or have lost a loved one due to a faulty blood clot filter contact our Vena Cava Filter Lawyers today.
IVC filters may cause the following severe complications:Blood Clot Filter migration Blood Clot Filter fracture Blood Clot Filter perforation Tilting of the Filter The inability to retrieve the IVC Filter Pulmonary embolism Compromised respiration Stroke Death
File Your Vena Cava Filter LawsuitThe filters have caused serious injury in patients. If you or a loved one has been injured by an IVC Filter contact us to discuss inclusion in the current IVC Filer lawsuits.
Were You Or A Loved One Injured BecauseParts of the IVC Filter broke lose Moved or migrated Punctured or perforated organs Became lodged in the wrong part of the body Blocked blood vessels Became wedged in the body
Speak to a Blood Clot Filter Lawyer Now
Risperdal Lawyers Filing Gynecomastia Lawsuits
If you or a loved one was prescribed Risperdal as a teenage boy and now have enlarged breasts, developed female type breasts and /or been diagnosed with Gynecomastia, contact Class Action Lawyer Network Risperdal Injury Lawyers today to discuss your options in a Risperdal lawsuit.
Our Resperdal lawyers are reviewing cases for young boys diagnosed with gynecomastia or male breasts after using Risperdal. Problems may result in:
- Breast Growth Among Boys
- Puffy Nipples or Enlarged Nipples
- Galactorrhea (production of milk from breasts)
- Painful Breasts or Nipple Discharge
- Mastectomy or Gynecomastia Surgery to Remove Male Breasts
- Gynecomastia (growth of male breasts, which may be painful or tender)
If your son has been diagnosed with Gynacomastia call our Resperdal helpline and speak to our trained medical social worker today.
Rispedral Side Effects In Male Children
Risperdal (risperidone) is an antipsychotic manufactured by Johnson & Johnson. It was originally approved by the FDA for use for adults with schizophrenia. Risperdal has also been widely used by children for bi-polar disorders, autism, irritability, aggression and behavior disorders.
Speak To A Risperdal Lawyer
The Riserdal lawyers are reviewing cases for Risperdal breast growth among boys.
Children Are Being Injured By Risperdal
Lawsuits are being filed for abnormal development of large mammary glands among boys and adolescents, resulting in breast development. Surgery has been necessary to remove the breasts caused by the Risperdal gynecomastia. This has caused emotional trauma for boys and young adult males and some incidents of suicide. Parents throughout the United States are pursuing a Rispedal lawsuit on behalf of kchildren who developed breasts on Risperdal.
Lawsuits allege that Johnson & Johnson failed to adequately research the effects of their medication or warn about the connection between Risperdal and breast growth.
Risperdal Lawsuit Update
Although Resperdal is not currently an MDL, settlements for Risperdal breast growth have been reached by Johnson & Johnson in lawsuits bellwether trials where a number of cases are presented to juries to test the potential settlements and outcomes. Do not delay. Call no to discuss a Resperdal lawsuit.
Bladder Sling Lawyers, Bladder Sling Lawyers Filing Nationwide Bladder Sling Lawsuits
The bladder sling lawyers of Class Action Lawyer Network are accepting all nationwide bladder sling lawsuits. Lawsuits are being filed as a part of the consolidated MDL'S in West Virginia.
What Is A Bladder Sling?
Bladder slings are used to treat urinary incontinence by implanting a sling around the urethra. The bladder sling is attached to the abdominal wall or pelvic bone. The bladder sling is a vaginal mesh device, and has all the complications for which TVT lawsuits are being filed.
Bladder Sling Complications
Erosion thru the vaginal wall
Erosion into the bladder,
Pain during sexual intercourse,
Perforation of bladder, colon,
Our bladder sling lawyers are filing bladder sling lawsuits for women. You must file a bladder sling lawsuit quickly, as the statute of limitations is running very close in many states.
The manufacturers are:
Bard Avaulta Support System MDL No. 2187
AMS Elevate Prolapse Repair System MDL No. 2325
AMS Apogee Vault Suspension System
AMS Perigee System
AMS Monarc Sling System
AMS Sparc Sling System
Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh MDL No. 2327
Ethicon Gynecare Prolene Soft Mesh
Ethicon Gynecare Prolift Pelvic Floor Repair System
Ethicon Gynecare TVT Transvaginal Sling
Boston Scientific Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair Kit MDL No.2326
Boston Scientific Uphold Vaginal Support System
Vaginal Mesh Multi District Lawsuit List Consolidated Under Judge Goodwin in West Virginia
MDL – 2325, IN RE: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
MDL No. 2187 | In RE: CR Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
MDL – 2326 IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
MDL – 2327 IN RE: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
Our experienced bladder sling lawyes ready to file bladder sling lawsuits slings problem lawsuits. Vaginal mesh products have many different names. Do not assume your bladder sling is not covered in the TVT lawsuits until you speak to one of our bladder sling lawyers. Many states have a statue of limitations issue. Time is of the essence. Call our nationwide bladder sling lawyers today.
Yaz, Yasmin Lawsuit Multidistrict Litigation
MDL 2100 – Yasmin and YAZ (Drospirenone) Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, multidistrict litigation (MDL) in Illinois federal court.
Yaz lawyers are accepting Yaz lawsuits for blood clot related injuries:
- Pulmonary Embolism
- Blood Clots
- Deep Vein Thrombosis
Bayer is facing thousands of Yaz and Yasmin lawsuits involving blood clot related injuries.
Yaz Blood Clot Settlements
According to Bayer’s 2nd Quarter 2013 Statement, Bayer haa agreed to pay more than $1.4 billion to resolve an estimated 6,700 lawsuits from women who suffered a:
Heart attack or Stroke from Yaz or Yasmin
Pulmonary Embolism from Yaz or Yasmin
Deep Vein Thrombosis from Yaz or Yasmin
There are still more than 5,000 additional claims involving a thrombosis blood clot related injury. Bayer is continuing negotiating on a case-by-case basis, after complete documentation and presentation of the claim by an attorney. It is not too late to file your Yaz blood clot lawsuit. Our Yaz lawyers are still continuing to review and evaluate potential claims from women who suffered a pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, heart attack, stroke or other blood clot injury while using Yaz, Yasmin or Ocella.
If you or a loved one has been injured by Yaz or a loved one has died from a Yaz related injury call us for a Yaz lawyer today.
Class Action Lawyer Network Tylenol liver damage lawyers report that tylenol liver failure lawsuits will be centralized in a multidistrict litigation in Pennsylvania Federal Court,
Tylenol Lawsuit Consolidated In Pennsylvania
All Tylenol liver damage lawsuits filed against McNeil-PPC, Perrigo, Novartis and others have been consolidated under multidistrict litigation in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to facilitate the pretrial proceedings for these cases
The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) has ruled that 27 Tylenol liver damage lawsuits filed against the manufacturers of tylenol related products will be consolidated under Tylenol Lawsuit MDL 2436 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
All of the cases conslidated in MDL 2436 involve liver damge related injury or wrongful death. These claims alledged that use of over-the-counter (OTC) Tylenol (generically acetaminophen) caused the victims to suffer from serious liver damage or liver failure.
Call Class Action Lawyer Network's Tylenol Liver Damage Lawsuit Department Today.
The MDL Judicial Panel feel that the allegations of liver injury associated with the use of OTC Tylenol, the cases share factual issues regarding the design, manufacture, labeling, marketing and sale of Tylenol. Consequently, the centralization of these cases in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania would eliminate duplicative discovery facilitate the proceedings.
Class Action Lawyer Nwtwork attorneys have decades of collective dangerous drig and device lawsuit experience,
If you or a loved one has suffered liver damage or liver failure while taking Tylenol call us to discuss a Tylenol liver damage lawsuit or Tylenol liver failure lawsuit.
Tylenol Liver Damage Lawsuit Criteria
Have you or a loved one been diagnosed with Liver Failure, liver damage from taking Tylenol? Do you have a clean medical history of any liver problems such as: Liver cancer, liver mass, Autoimmune Hepatitis, Alcoholic Cirrhosis,Primary Sclerosing Colangitis, Wilson’s disease, or Budd Chiari Syndrome and yet, now have liver damage after taking Tylenol?
Our Tylenol liver damage lawyers are accepting Tylenol liver failure cases if the liver failure results in hospitalization, liver transplant, or liver transplant waiting list or death. If you meet this criteria we would like to speak to you regarding filing a Tylenol liver damage or liver failure case.
Class Action Lawyer Network accepting Tylenol liver damage lawsuts or liver failure lawsuits for individuals who experienced any of the following within a week after taking an acetaminophen medication such as Tylenol:
- Hospitalization Due to Severe Liver Injury or Liver Problems
- Diagnosed with Liver Failure
- Liver Transplant or Placed on Waiting List for Liver Transplant
- Death from Liver Failure