Posts Tagged ‘Fargo’
Do You Want To File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit?If you have used talcum powder or baby powder products and developed ovarian cancer you may be able to file a Talcum Powder lawsuit Current lawsuits Johnson & Johnson claim that long-term use of talc-based products caused women to develop ovarian cancer. Victims claim that they were not warned of the risks associated with these talc products. Women and their families may be able to seek compensation for ovarian cancer diagnosis with the help of one of our lawyers.
Is There A Risk of Talcum Powder Causing Ovarian Cancer?Talcum powder lawsuits claim Talcum Powder caused ovarian cancer. When used as a feminine hygiene product, talc particles can travel through the vagina and into the ovaries and remain trapped for years. These talc particles can cause inflammation and eventually lead to the growth of ovarian cancer cells.
Studies Claim Dangers Of Talcum PowderAlthough Johnson & Johnson maintains that talcum powder is safe for use, plaintiffs in ovarian cancer lawsuits offer studies that suggest an association between talc and ovarian cancer dating as far back as 1971. In 1994, Johnson & Johnson was put on notice of a link between talc and ovarian cancer. A letter was sent from the Cancer Prevention Coalition to the then-CEO of the company.
Will There Be a Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Class Action Lawsuit I Can Join ?According to news reports, more than 1,200 women claim talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. Currently the lawsuits are being filed at the state level.
Talcum Powder Lawsuit SettlementsA $72 million talcum powder verdict is handed down against Johnson & Johnson in favor of a woman who claimed that long-term Shower-to-Shower use for feminine hygiene caused her to develop ovarian cancer. The verdict included a $62 million award of punitive damages against the company. Our talcum powder cancer lawyers are available to discuss your options.
Lawyers Filing Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits For Baby Powder
Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Do You Want To File A Baby Powder Cancer Lawsuit?Studies show that talcum-based powder can cause ovarian cancer in women who have used it for genital/perineal hygiene. Studies dating back to 1982 have consistently linked prolonged talc-based baby and body powder usage with ovarian cancer. The talc particles moves through the female reproductive system and settles in the ovaries. These particles may remain in the ovaries for many years, creating inflammation resulting in the development and proliferation of cancer cells. Studies HAVE Linked Ovarian Cancer to Talc-Based Baby/Body Powder The pathology reports and tissue samples that were used to diagnose the ovarian cancer can now be examined to determine whether your ovarian tissues contain talc particles. Talc particles can be found in the pelvic lymph nodes, ovaries, and fallopian tubes and take many years to disintegrate and exit the body. The talcum powder cancer lawyers at Class Action Lawyer Network are speaking to women about talc having caused your ovarian cancer.
Speak To A Talcum Powder LawyerIf you have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer after long term use of talcum-based products, such as Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder, Shower to Shower, and others we want to talk to you regarding filing a talcum powder cancer lawsuit.
Did The Manufacturers Of The Transvaginal Mesh And Bladder Sling Give Sufficient Warning?
Boston Vaginal Mesh Lawyers say no in the thousands of transvaginal mesh and bladder sling claims that have been filed in the Pelvic Mesh Repair Lawsuits MDL'Ls.
According to transvaginal mesh lawyers accross the country who are filing vaginal mesh and bladder sling lawsuits the warning was insufficient. For a warning to be sufficient, a transvaginal mesh warning should appropriately signal danger while simultaneously providing the information in order to use the product appropriately. A pharmaceutical or medical device manufacturer doesn’t necessarily have to discuss matters that are basic medical knowledge. They are not in a position to control the individual practices of doctors in every single medical community.
Will The Device Warnings The Transvaginal meshmanufacturers provided to the doctor relieve them of their duty to warn the patient.
What are some ways that warnings can become inadequate? Some variables that courts will consider include: If they are overly broad or too generic, contradictory statements made in the inserts, actions by the sales representatives, and presenting the warning in a way that makes it unlikely to be read. Remember, every case is different. In some cases, a doctor might not even bother to read the warnings. In other cases, the possibility of an adverse reaction is too small to even impact the doctor’s decision. There have even been cases where a doctor has stated that even if he were given new information, he would have still followed through with his initial decision.
What other possible legal theories being explored? If a company supplies product related information to the public that amounts to an express warranty, they can be held liable for breach of warranty if the plaintiff can successfully prove that the information was false.
We will be watching the pelvic mesh repair proceedings and waiting to see how they play out.
To file a Transvagina, mesh lawsuit for a Prolene mesh surgicall implanted in: D.C., Daytona, Fort Myers, Ft Lauderdale, Gainesville, Jacksonville, Keys, Lakeland, Miami, Ocala, Orlando, Panama City, Pensacola, Sarasota, St. Augustine, Boston, Springfield, Worcester, Ann Arbor, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Jackson, Lansing, Minneapolis, St Paul, Charlotte. Fayetteville, Greensboro, Raleigh, Wilmington, Winston Salem, Fargo, Providence, Charleston, Columbia, Florence, Greenville, Seattle, Tacoma, Charleston, Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Cheyenne, Casper, Laramie, Gillette, Milwaukee, Montana, Billings, Springfield, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Omaha ,Manchester, Albuquerque, Charlotte, Raleigh, Greensboro, Winston-Salem, Durham, Fayetteville, Wilmington, Providence, Charleston Seattle, Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Casper or Laramie call Class Action Lawyer Network transvaginal mesh attorneys today.
Gynemesh Class Action Lawyers are filing lawsuits against the manufacturers of the Gynemesh transvsagina mesh Implant in 3, 4, 5 and 6 year product liability statute states.
Our Gynemesh Class Action Lawyers Are Accepting Transvaginal mesh Lawsuits
For Gynemesh Vaginal Mesh Surgically Implanted In The Following 3, 4, 5 and 6 year product liability statute states.
D.C, Florida, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Ethicon Gynecare Prolift Pelvic Mesh Lawsuits For Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh
Ethicon Gynecare Prosima Pelvic Mesh
Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh
Ethicon Prolene Mesh
Ethicon Gynecare TVT Sling
An Ethicon Gynemesh vaginal mesh or bladder sling lawsuits are being filed for women who have experienced complications.
Gynemesh Complications Include
- Erosion of the Mesh
- Urinary Problems
- Digestive problems
- Pelvic Pain
- Re Prolapse
- Injury to Nearby Organs
- Difficulty during intimacy
The FDA has received reports of problems with Ethicon Gynemesh vaginal mesh implants
Overview Of Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh
Gynecare Gynemesh was first introduced in October 2002. Gynemesh is also called the Gynecare GynemeshPS, nonabsorbable Prolene Soft Mesh, for vaginal wall prolapse surgical treatment.
What Is Ethicon Gynemesh?
Ethicon Gynemesh is porous, which allows surrounding tissues to grow into and incorporate the material as part of the body, which can create severe complications. If you are a victim of a faulty Gynemesh Vaginal Mesh
Speak To A Gynemesh Lawsuit Attorney Today
It has become apparent that there is a large number of drugs and devices class actions that have been filed against manyfacturers that have targeted women.
We can start with the Dow Corning siicone breast implant class action of years ago. Women are still suffering today. The Dow Corning Trust just recently launched a silicone breast implant explant program. The leaking silicone and bursting implants lead to toxicity related immune system diseases like lupus and fibromylagia and other immune deficiency diseases. Women to this date are still suffering from their Dow silicone Breast Implants and the Dow Corning settlement trust is stll living out payments like the new breast explant program.
Fosamax was supposed to cure osteoporosis but ended up causing femur fractures.Then we have Yaz and Yasmine birth control pills. Young women were having their lives altered by pre-mature strokes, pulmonary embolisms, deep vein thrombosis, blood clots and heart attacks. Many girls harmed were barely starting a college life.
History moves along to the metal on metal and metal componednt hip replacements like the DePuy Pinnacle and ASR Hip Replacement and the Stryker Rejuvinate and ABG II Modular Stems. These are a metal on metal hip replacement recalled for their need for revision surgery. These hip replacements failed in women more then men. The smaller frame of a women makes the device more prone to problems in the female structure.
NuvRing has been another disaster for women causing:
blood clots in women
cerebral thrombosis in women
deep vein thrombosis
heart attack in women
retinal thrombosis in women
stroke or cerebral hemorrhage
thrombophlebitis and venous thrombosis with or without embolism
toxic shock syndrome
Fosamax for osteoporosis actually causes what it is prescribed to fix , femur fractures.
Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits
The biggest and most horrific is the the various vaginal mesh devices for urinary incontinence and uterine, bladder and bowel prolapse. This mesh device is made of a Prolene plastic synthetic fiber that has been falling aprt in women. Thousands of women across the country are screaming the horrors of the vaginal mesh and lawsuits are being filed in droves. Women are in severe pain described as razor blades. The mesh has been reported by female victims to be eroding thru the vaginal wall and at times into the bladder and bowel. Women can no longer have sexual intercourse and marriages are falling apart. Women are losing their jobs and cannot work. And then we have the Mirena IUD which has been gravitating our of postion and ending up embedded in the uterus or a nearby organ.
Lives are being ruined and justice must be sought. Lawsuits are the only thing these manufacturers understand.
Lipitor lawyers of Class Action Lawyer Network are filing lawsuits for women who are getting type 2 diabetis from lipitor.
Lipitor is prescribed to lower her cholesterol levels and help decrease the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. However, after using the medication many women are being d diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.
It appears Pfizer knew about the increased risk of diabetes from Lipitor, but failed to provide adequate warnings for women and their doctors.
Lipitor Is Causing Type 2 diabetes in women taking Lipitor
What Is Lipitor?
Lipitor (atorvastatin) is one of the most widely used brand-name medications in the United States. Millions of people take the medication to help lower cholesterol. Pfizer had more than $125 billion in Lipitor sales.
FDA Warning For Lipitor
In February 2012, the FDA required new diabetes warnings for Lipitor. This was due to the increased risk of changes to blood glucose levels.
Lipitor lawyers are filing Lipitor lawsuits
Mullti District Litigation Consolidation For Lipitor Lawsuits
U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) rejected a request filed by Lipitor lawyers to centralize all cases brought in the federal court system. The MDL panel has determined that each of the cases will proceed as individual lawsuits in the U.S. District Court where they were filed.More than half of the pending actions are already consolidated before one judge in the District of South Carolina.
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with Type II Diabetis after taking Lipitor contact us to speak toa Lipitor lawyer today.
Injured in a major truck accident that was the truck driver's fault? Truck accident are usually disastrous due to the sheer size and higa truck accident can be even more devastating than one involving another automobile.
Truck accidents can cause serious injuries, lost work days, vehicle damage, pain and suffering, and sometimes, tragically, death. That’s why you need to talk with an experienced truck accident lawyer. Call trucking accidents lawyers network to ensure your legal rights are protected. A truck accident attorney can get you the justice and money you deserve. When there is a truck accident with a tractor trailor on a major highway multiple people in multiple passenger vehicles can be injured. Truck accidents are high-stakes commercial, class actions, and personal injury claims.
Truck Accident Lawyers Of Class Action Lawyer Network
A big truck or trailer can cause devasting injuries to the passengers in a smaller vehicle. If you've been injured in a traffic trailer or truck collision call us for a free consultation.
Truck accidents almost always result in serious injuries to the passengers of the automobile or cars involved. It is just plain physics. Large trucks can weigh tons.
Truck accidents can be caused by: a badly maintained truck, unsafe operation of the truck by the truck driver, a sleepy truck driver, an inexperienced truck driver, mechanical failure and drunk driving.
If you've been injured in a traffic trailer or truck collision speak to our truck accident lawyers today.
Class action lawyers announce another DePuy recall: DePuy Hip replacement and custom joint implants
DePuy has been forced to recall another product. FDA Forces DePuy Recall of Custom Joint Implants
September 5, 2012 by: Linda Grayling
DePuy Orthopaedics is being forced to recall yet another line of hip and other artificial joint implants. This time, the Johnson & Johnson subsidiary is pulling back its custom orthopedic devices because of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety concerns. The recall notice was issued on August 24 — two years after its ASR hip-implant recall.
DePuy agreed in January 2012 to stop manufacturing the custom devices after a warning letter from the FDA. In it, the agency said the implants were being sold without federal approval, which requires an application with the FDA and clinical trials. DePuy argued that the devices were exempt because they were already approved by the FDA and modified only by doctors’ prescriptions, which is permitted by law.
But the FDA disagreed: “Although the devices’ size and shape may vary with each patient’s anatomy, the standardized design characteristics do not vary among the devices manufactured. The fact that final specifications are tailored to match a patient’s anatomy does not preclude a clinical study or submission of a marketing application for the devices.”
The FDA also said DePuy used poor quality-control systems in the production of the 14 types of custom implants. It ordered the company to recall any implants that had been delivered to surgeons prior to the halt in manufacturing earlier this year. More than 8,300 customized DePuy implants have been sold since 1999, but the number of unused devices in the recall is unknown.
DePuy already is dealing with a massive global recall of 93,000 ASR hip-replacement and hip-resurfacing devices that was announced in August 2010. The defective metal-on-metal hip implants have been shown to fail within a few years, resulting in painful revision surgeries. Typically, all-metal hip implants are expected to last about 15 years.
In addition, the DePuy artificial hips produce metal shavings when the ball and socket components grind against each other, causing metallosis, or metal poisoning of the blood. One British study found that when the metal debris becomes embedded in surrounding tissues, it increases the patient’s risk of bladder and kidney cancers.
In the United States, more than 8,000 patients have filed lawsuits against DePuy over their dangerous hip implants. Of those, 6,000 federal cases are part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL) that is being overseen by Judge David A. Katz in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The first case in the MDL is expected to go to trial in March or April 2013.
The remaining state cases are winding their way through the courts. The first three DePuy ASR lawsuits, which were scheduled to be tried together in Las Vegas, Nevada, were settled out of court recently. Bloomberg reported the plaintiffs each received about $200,000.