Login

Posts Tagged ‘Florida’

Stockert 3T Heater-Cooler Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Atlanta, Baltimore, Biloxi, Boca Raton, Boston, Charleston, Charlotte, Dallas, Denver, Detroit, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Fort Lauderdale, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas city, Los Angeles, Louisville, Macon, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Miami, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minneapolis, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Provo, st louis, Stocker 3THeater-Cooler Lawyers, Toledo, West Palm Beach

Stockert 3T Heater-Cooler Lawyers For  Wrongful Death Lawsuits

Stockert 3T Heater-Cooler System lawyers are filing failure  to warn lawsuits due to increased risk of infections caused by the Cooler Systems during cardio thoracic surgery.

 Stockert 3T Lawsuits Filed

Lawsuits are being filed against  LivaNova PLC for their  3T heating-cooling system. This system has been found to transmit bacteria into patients during  open-chest cardiac surgery. The nontuberculous mycobacteria causes Mycobacterium chimaera which can result in death,

What is  The 3T Heater-Cooler System?

The 3T heater-cooler units are used during surgery to control  body temperature.  They  have water tanks that move temperature-controlled water to heat exchangers or blankets, which  cool or warm  the recipients body.

 3T Heater-Cooler System Issues

The water  in the 3T systems can become contaminated resulting  in bacteria being released into the air through the device’s exhaust vent. This bacteria can infect a patient. It can take  several years between the time a patient is exposed to the bacteria and an infection is diagnosed.

Have You Had Surgery Using A 3T Cooler Device?

Up To 4 Years After Surgery Look for signs:

  • endocarditis,
  • surgical site infection,
  • abscess, bacteremia,
  • hepatitis,
  • renal insufficiency,
  • splenomegaly,
  • pancytopenia,
  • osteomyelitis.

 Symptoms

  • fever of undetermined origin,
  • night sweats,
  • joint pain,
  • weight loss,
  • myalgia,
  • malaise.
 

Contact our  Stocker 3T Lawyers

Faulty Hernia Mesh Lawyers | Hernia Mesh Recall Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Abdominal Hernia Mesh Surgery, Class Action Articles, Class MDL Class Action News, Hernia Mesh lawsuit, Hernia mesh lawyer, Kugel mesh lawyer, Medical Device Lawsuits, Physiomesh Hernia Mesh Lawsuit, Physiomesh Lawyer

 Hernia Surgery Lawyers

Our Hernia Mesh surgery lawyers are reviewing cases for a faulty Hernia mesh. Have you  suffered  complications as a result of abdominal hernia surgery using the  Physiomesh, Composix, Kugel, Marlex, Perfix Plug, Proceed, Prolene, Sepramesh, Ventralex or Davol?

Were You Injured By A Faulty Hernia Mesh?

Hernia Mesh Complications Include: Pain, Infection, Tissue adhesion, Obstruction of the intestines, Hernia came back, Hernia mesh migration, Perforation, and the   Need Additional Hernia Mesh Revisions.

File Your Hernia Mesh Lawsuit

Lawsuits are being filed  against the manufacturers of hernia mesh due to  defective design and failure to warn of the  risks.

Physiomesh Hernia Mesh Complications Lawyers

Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Ethicon has recalled their Physiomesh surgical mesh due to a demonstrated a higher recurrence of hernias and revision surgeries. Ethicon has thousands of  transvaginal mesh lawsuits pending  and is due to the failure of the very same mesh product used in their Physiomesh.

Physiomesh Complications

Severe pain Infections Hernia recurrence Adhesions Intestinal blockage Mesh migration or movement Physiomesh shrinkage Bleeding Perforation from the deterioration of the mesh Revisions or mesh removal surgery

Get A Hernia Mesh  Lawyer

If you or a loved one has had an abdominal  hernia mesh  repair  and has experienced any of the complications listed above it is important that you contact us  as soon as possible

Hernia Mesh Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Boca Raton, Boston, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Charleston, Charlotte, Class Action Articles, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Dallas, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Denver, Detroit, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Fort Lauderdale, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Hernia mesh lawyer, Houston, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas city, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Louisiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Louisville, Macon, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mass tort lawyer, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Miami, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minneapolis, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NYC, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Physiomesh Hernia Mesh Lawsuit, Physiomesh Lawyer, Provo, Raleigh-Durham, Reno, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Sarasota, Seattle, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, st louis, Tennessee Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Toledo, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Palm Beach, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Ethicon has recalled it’s Physiomesh and hernia mesh lawyers are filing hernia mesh lawsuits for a failed hernia mesh.

Complications From A  Hernia Mesh Repair?

Has the Hernia Returned?

Patients are having complications from  the Ethicon defective recalled hernia mesh. Hernia mesh lawyers are accepting lawsuits. The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) is scheduled to hear oral arguments about consolidating federally filed lawsuits involving Atrium Medical Corp.’s C-Qur line of polypropylene surgical mesh for hernia repair.  Hernia mesh lawyers expect that an MDL for Ethicon’s Physiomesh will be formed soon given the number of cases coming forth.

 Florida Physiomesh Lawsuit Filed

There has been a Florida lawsuit filed on December 27, 2016 in the U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida for  complications associated with the defective mesh. It was necessary for this woman to go thru additional hernia revision surgery.  An abdominal bulge, recurrent hernia, pain, and adhesion was suffered Her lawsuit claims that the Physiomesh Composite mesh patch for her hernia surgery was not reasonably safe. The risks of the design outweighed any potential benefits. (Case No. 8:16-cv-03502-JDW-JSS)

Hernia Mesh Lawyers Are Filing Lawsuits

There has been a need for revision surgery due to:

  • Severe Abdominal Pain
  • Organ Perforation, Adhesions or Erosion
  • Infections

Surgical Removal of Hernia Mesh Lawsuits

 

Ethicon Physiomesh Lawyer | Hernia mesh Lawsuits Filed

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Ethicon Physiomesh lawyer

Ethicon Physiomesh Hernia Mesh Recall Lawyers

On May 25, 2016, Johnson & Johnson issued an “Urgent Field Safety Notice” to warning  of the higher rates of recurring hernia and the need for revision operations after hernia repair using the Ethicon Physiomesh Composite Mesh. This is the same company that is dealing with hundreds of vaginal mesh lawsuits made of the same substance as the physiomesh.

Physiomesh Hernia Mesh  Complications

  • Hernia Recurrence
  • Scar-like tissue that sticks tissues together
  • Blockage of the large or small intestine
  • Abnormal adhesions between organs, vessels or intestines
  • Fluid build-up at the surgical site
  • Perforation of nearby tissues or organs
  • Migration and shrinkage
  • Bowel perforation and obstruction
  • Migration of the mesh and  erosion resulting in the need for revision or removal

What Is A Physiomesh?

  • Ethicon Physiomesh and vaginal  mesh are both used to provide additional support to weakened or damaged tissue.  It is made from non-absorbable polypropylene (plastic) filaments that are woven into a mesh.
Ethicon Physiomesh Products Recalled ETHICON PHYSIOMESH™ Flexible Composite Mesh
  • PHY0715R
  • PHY1015V
  • PHY1515Q
  • PHY1520R
  • PHY1520V
  • PHY2025V
  • PHY2030R
  • PHY2535V
  • PHY3035R
  • PHY3050R

    Laparoscopic Hernia Pack

  • ELH5 PHY1515
  • ELH10 PHY1515Q
Ethicon Physiomesh Complications? Speak to one our mesh lawyers.  

Stryker Femoral Heads Hip Replacement Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News, Stryker femoral head hip Implant lawyer

Stryker V40 Taper Hip Replacement Lawyers Stryker Hip Replacement Lawyers

Hip Implant lawyers are filing hip replacement lawsuits for V40 Femoral head failure in the Stryker Hip Implant. In August 2016, Stryker contacted implanting physicians about metal wear associated with its V40 Taper when used with some cobalt chromium heads.Stryker Orthopaedics sent an Urgent Medical Device Recall Notification to orthopedic surgeons. The recall involves certain sizes of LIFT™ Anatomic CoCr V40™ Femoral Heads manufactured prior to 2011. If you had a LIFT- V40 Femoral Head implanted during total hip replacement, you should be watching for a letter from your surgeon in the next few weeks. You may also be getting a letter from Stryker or a company hired by Stryker to handle claims.

 Stryker Recall Metal V 40 Femoral Heads Lawsuits

Stryker has voluntarily recalled some of their metal V40 femoral heads used with hip implants. Stryker hip replacement lawyers are interested in speaking to anyone with a failed: Exeter, Citation, Meridian, Reliance, Definition, Restoration, Accolade Rejuvenate ABG 2 stems.

This failure may be due to the problems with the V40 femoral head.

The failure of these heads is caused by corrosion and metal debris at the junction between the metal head and neck. The clinical results for patients include pain, loss of mobility, ambulation problems and an inability to work. Poisoning of the soft tissue, muscle and bone are the cause. Revision surgeries may be needed due to premature failures. Stryker lawyers  are seeking patients with  LFit V40 femoral heads made before 2011.

What Is The Femoral Head  Problem?

This is a ball for total hip replacements that can be attached to hip stems, including the Accolade TMZF, Accolade 2, Meridian, and Citation. There have been numerous incidents  of taper lock failures on LFit V40 femoral heads made before 2011,  This taper lock connects the “ball” part of the hip joint to the  hip stem that is inserted in the femur. When it breaks the femoral head will detach from the femoral neck.

Get A Stryker Hip Implant Lawyer

Our Stryker Hip Replacement lawyers are currently accepting Stryker LFit V40 failure cases.

Multi District Litigation Requested For Invokana

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Anaheim, Atlanta, Baltimore, Charleston, Charlotte, Class MDL Class Action News, Dallas, Denver, Fort Lauderdale, Houston, Invokana lawsuit, Invokana lawyer, Invokana Lawyers, Kansas city, Ketoacidosis Lawyer, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Louisville, Macon, Miami, Minneapolis, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NYC, NYC Class Action Lawyers, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Provo, Raleigh-Durham, Reno, Sarasota, Seattle, st louis, Toledo, West Palm Beach, Xarelto Lawyer, Xarelto Lawyers

A Multi District Litigation has been requested for the consolidation of the Invokana lawsuits by Invokana lawyers as lawsuits continue to increase. A consolidation is requested to facilitate proceeding under one judge and jurisdiction. The  lawsuits against the manufacturer of the diabetes drug Invokana are alleging serious injuries after taking Invokana, including heart attack, kidney damage and a dangerous blood condition known as ketoacidosis. The  lawsuits claim that  Johnson & Johnson and its  subsidiary Janssen failed to warn patients and doctors  about the risks of taking Invokana. Invokana lawyers filed a  motion on September 20 asking the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to  consolidate Invokana lawsuits. The formation of an MDL would transfer all cases to a single judge and jurisdiction. Invikana lawyers explained in the motion that the  FDA had received many reports of kidney damage as a result of patients taking Invokana, which led the FDA to issue a stronger  Invokana warning risk with a June 2016 label change. That warning was preceded by another label change in May 2015, alerting users to the risk of ketoacidosi. Ketoacidoasis can be a life-threatening condition that occurs when blood acids known as ketones reach dangerously high levels. Additional warnings were added to the label in August 2016, noting that fatal cases of ketoacidosis had been reported with Invokana use. What Is Invokana? Invokana is a diabetes drug in the   SGLT2 inhibitor category. It  regulate blood sugar levels by encouraging the body to eliminate extra glucose in urine. Consolidation has been requested for the  District Court of New Jersey in Trenton, where 36 of the Invokana lawsuits are already pending. All of those cases are before Judge Brian R. Martinotti, a federal judge the motion notes has extensive experience with complex litigation. If you or a loved one has  had a life threatening event due to Invokana call out Invokana Helpline today.  

Risperdal Lawyer For Gynecomastia Lawsuits Young Boys With Enlarged Breasts From Risperdal

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Drug Lawsuits, Drug Warnings, Risperdal Lawyers

Class Action Lawyer Network Risperdal  Lawyers Filing Lawsuits For  Enlarged Breasts (Gynecomastia) in Young Men From Risperdal

A number of lawsuits  have  been filed alleging  the use of Risperdal  cauded  enlarged breast tissue in young men. Johnson & Johnson has already settled the first of over 100 Risperdal gynecomastia lawsuits. If your son was a victim of Risperdal and it caused severe emotional harm and medical, surgical intervention call and speak to one of our Risperdal lawyers today.

Risperdal Has Been l Linked to Gynecomastia

Risperdal is an antipsychotic medication manufactured by Johnson & Johnson used to treat psychiatric disorders. Young boys on this medication have severe psychological problems.  Using Risperdal may lead to breast growth in men, or gynecomastia.  The result is  severe emotional and medical problems including:

    Swelling

    Pain

    Tenderness

    Nipple discharge in one or both breasts

    The need for surgery for breast reduction

    Psychological effects including suicidal ideation

If Your Son Has Been A Victim The Choice Is Clear

 

If you or a loved one took Risperdal and suffered from gynecomastia or other potential side effects you must consider filing a lawsuit against the manufacturer. Call and speak to one of our Risperdal attorneys

Actos Lawsuit Update

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Actos Lawsuit Lawyers, Drug Lawsuits, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Actos is a medication taken by Type II  ( adult onset ) diabetics to control their insulin production. Actos lawsuits are being filed for victims of bladder cancer from Actos.

Actos Lawsuit Update

 Actos lawsuits that allege long-term use of the Type 2 diabetes drug caused patients to develop bladder cancer continue to move forward in a multidistrict litigation underway in U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana. According to court documents, the proceeding’s next Case Management Conference will be held on Thursday, October 24, 2013, at 10:30 a.m. (In re: Actos Product Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2299)

Actos Lawsuit News

According to court documents Actos litigation involving bladder cancer allegations got underway shortly after the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) warned in June 2011 that use of the drug for 12 months or more had been associated with an increased risk of the disease. At that time, the FDA ordered Takeda Pharmaceuticals to add new warnings to the Actos label about its potential to cause bladder cancer.
Court filings indicate that more than 2,500 Actos lawsuits are now pending in the Western District of Louisiana, where the first case will go to trial in January. Plaintiffs in Actos lawsuits allege that Takeda Pharmaceuticals and other defendants concealed knowledge that the medication could increase a person’s chances of developing bladder cancer, and failed to provide adequate warnings about that risk to the public and medical community.
On the state level, two Actos claims involving bladder cancer allegations have already gone to trial. Last month, a Maryland State Court jury awarded $1.7 million to the family of a man who died of bladder cancer following long-term use of Actos. However, according to court records, the judge presiding over the trial tossed out the verdict because the jury also found that the decedent’s decades-long smoking habit contributed to the development of the disease. (An v. Nieberlein, 24-C12003565, Circuit Court for the City of Baltimore, State of Maryland.)
This past April, a Los Angeles Superior Court jury awarded $6.5 million to a plaintiff who developed bladder cancer following four years of Actos use. However, the plaintiff is currently appealing a decision by the judge overseeing the case to grant Takeda Pharmaceuticals’ request to set aside the verdict. (Cooper v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc., CGC-12-518535, California Superior Court)
Long-term users of Actos ( over 2 years ) who have been diagnosed with bladder cancer may be eligible to file an Actos lawsuit against Takeda Pharmaceuticals.

Actos Lawsuit Criteria

1. You must have taken Actos for over two years

2. You must have a confirmed diagnosis of bladder cancer

3. You must have no prior medical history of baldder cancer prior to taking Actos

Resperdal Class Action Lawyers, Resperdal Lawsuit Helpline

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Drug Lawsuits, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Resperdal lawsuits

Risperdal Lawyers Filing Gynecomastia Lawsuits

If you or a loved one was prescribed Risperdal as a teenage boy and now have enlarged breasts, developed female type breasts and /or been diagnosed with Gynecomastia,  contact Class Action Lawyer Network  Risperdal Injury Lawyers today to discuss your options in a Risperdal lawsuit.

Our Resperdal lawyers are reviewing cases for young  boys diagnosed with gynecomastia or male breasts after using Risperdal. Problems may result in:

  •     Breast Growth Among Boys
  •     Puffy Nipples or Enlarged Nipples
  •     Galactorrhea (production of milk from breasts)
  •     Painful Breasts or Nipple Discharge
  •     Mastectomy or Gynecomastia Surgery to Remove Male Breasts
  •     Gynecomastia (growth of male breasts, which may be painful or tender)

If your son has been diagnosed with Gynacomastia call our Resperdal helpline and speak to our trained medical social worker today.

Rispedral Side Effects In Male Children

Risperdal (risperidone) is an antipsychotic manufactured by Johnson & Johnson. It  was originally approved by the FDA for use for adults with schizophrenia.  Risperdal has also been widely used by children for bi-polar disorders, autism, irritability, aggression and behavior disorders.

Speak To A Risperdal Lawyer

The Riserdal  lawyers are reviewing cases for Risperdal breast growth among boys.

Children Are Being Injured By Risperdal

Lawsuits are being filed  for  abnormal development of large mammary glands among boys and adolescents, resulting in breast development.  Surgery has been  necessary to remove the breasts caused by the Risperdal gynecomastia.  This has caused emotional trauma for boys and young adult males and some incidents of suicide. Parents throughout the United States are pursuing a Rispedal lawsuit on behalf of kchildren  who developed breasts on Risperdal.

Lawsuits allege that Johnson & Johnson failed to adequately research the effects of their medication or warn about the connection between Risperdal and breast growth.

Risperdal Lawsuit Update

Although Resperdal is not currently an MDL, settlements for Risperdal breast growth have been reached by Johnson & Johnson in lawsuits bellwether trials where a number of cases are presented to juries to test the potential settlements and outcomes. Do not delay. Call no to discuss a Resperdal lawsuit.
 

 

 

Nationwide Bladder Sling Lawyer Outreach, Bladder Sling Lawsuits Being Filed

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Bladder Sling Lawyers, Bladder Sling Lawyers Filing Nationwide Bladder Sling Lawsuits

The bladder sling lawyers of Class Action Lawyer Network are accepting all nationwide bladder sling lawsuits. Lawsuits are being filed as a part of the consolidated MDL'S in West Virginia.

What Is A Bladder Sling?

Bladder slings are used to treat urinary incontinence by implanting  a sling around the urethra. The bladder sling is attached to the abdominal wall or pelvic bone. The bladder sling is a vaginal mesh device, and has all the complications for which TVT lawsuits are being filed.

Bladder Sling Complications

Erosion thru the vaginal wall 

Erosion into the bladder,

Pain during sexual intercourse,

Bleeding,

Infection,

Perforation of bladder, colon,

Urinary incontinence

Problems voiding.

Our bladder sling lawyers are  filing bladder sling lawsuits for  women. You must file a bladder sling lawsuit quickly, as the statute of limitations is running very close in many states.

 The manufacturers are:

    Bard Avaulta Support System MDL No. 2187

    AMS Elevate Prolapse Repair System MDL No. 2325

    AMS Apogee Vault Suspension System

    AMS Perigee System

    AMS Monarc Sling System

    AMS Sparc Sling System

    Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh MDL No. 2327

    Ethicon Gynecare Prolene Soft Mesh

    Ethicon Gynecare Prolift Pelvic Floor Repair System

    Ethicon Gynecare TVT Transvaginal Sling

    Boston Scientific Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair Kit MDL No.2326

    Boston Scientific Uphold Vaginal Support System

Vaginal Mesh Multi District Lawsuit List Consolidated Under Judge Goodwin in West Virginia

    MDL – 2325, IN RE: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL No. 2187 | In RE: CR Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2326 IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2327 IN RE: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
 

Our experienced bladder sling lawyes ready to file bladder sling lawsuits  slings problem lawsuits.  Vaginal mesh products have many different names. Do not assume your bladder sling is not covered in the TVT lawsuits  until you speak to one of our bladder sling  lawyers. Many states have a  statue of limitations issue. Time is of the essence. Call our nationwide bladder sling lawyers today.

Switch to Desktop Version