Posts Tagged ‘gainesville’
Which Manufacturers Are You Accepting IVC Filter Lawsuits For?
Bard IVC Filters Include:
- – Recovery
- – G2
- – G2X
- – Eclipse
- – Meridian
- – Denali’
- – Gunther Tulip
- – Celect
- – OptEase
- – TrapEase
Criteria For The IVC Filter Lawsuit
REASONS FOR IVC FILTER IMPLANTATION:
1. Date of removal2. Symptomatic or asymptomatic at time of removal?3. Percutaneous without complication(s) – Our lawyers are not taking these cases4. Open with or without complication(s) – Our lawyers are taking these cases.A CT Scan will be needed for evaluation of claim even if you are asymptomatic.MANUFACTURERS WE ARE NOT TAKING1. Boston Scientific (Greenfield SS and TI – Permanent) – We need to be careful in turningdown Greenfield filter cases because this is a generic term used to describe all IVCfilters.2. B. Braun Medical (Convertible, Vena Tech and LP)3. ALN4. Rex Medical (Option)5. Rafael Medical (SafeFlo)
Get An IVC Filter Lawyer
Do You Want To File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit?If you have used talcum powder or baby powder products and developed ovarian cancer you may be able to file a Talcum Powder lawsuit Current lawsuits Johnson & Johnson claim that long-term use of talc-based products caused women to develop ovarian cancer. Victims claim that they were not warned of the risks associated with these talc products. Women and their families may be able to seek compensation for ovarian cancer diagnosis with the help of one of our lawyers.
Is There A Risk of Talcum Powder Causing Ovarian Cancer?Talcum powder lawsuits claim Talcum Powder caused ovarian cancer. When used as a feminine hygiene product, talc particles can travel through the vagina and into the ovaries and remain trapped for years. These talc particles can cause inflammation and eventually lead to the growth of ovarian cancer cells.
Studies Claim Dangers Of Talcum PowderAlthough Johnson & Johnson maintains that talcum powder is safe for use, plaintiffs in ovarian cancer lawsuits offer studies that suggest an association between talc and ovarian cancer dating as far back as 1971. In 1994, Johnson & Johnson was put on notice of a link between talc and ovarian cancer. A letter was sent from the Cancer Prevention Coalition to the then-CEO of the company.
Will There Be a Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Class Action Lawsuit I Can Join ?According to news reports, more than 1,200 women claim talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. Currently the lawsuits are being filed at the state level.
Talcum Powder Lawsuit SettlementsA $72 million talcum powder verdict is handed down against Johnson & Johnson in favor of a woman who claimed that long-term Shower-to-Shower use for feminine hygiene caused her to develop ovarian cancer. The verdict included a $62 million award of punitive damages against the company. Our talcum powder cancer lawyers are available to discuss your options.
Benicar Gastrointestinal Injury Lawyers
Filing Benicar Intestinal Injury Lawsuits
What Is Benicar?Benicar is a high blood pressure medication. Benicor has been linked to severe intestinal injury, intestinal damage, chronic diarrhea, malnourishment and severe weight loss. Seniors are the largest population receiving prescriptions for Benicar and are the most vulnerable to sever injury from Benicar.
FDA Benicar WarningsThe FDA has warned patients and doctors that Benicar (olmesartan medoxomil) may cause a severe gastrointestinal (GI) problem called Villous Atrophy. Benicar causes the intestines to lose the texture and makes it difficult to absorb nutrients. This leads to malnutrition which and other digestive problems. This is very dangerous for seniors and can lead to death or hospitalization because of dehydration, chronic diarrhea and malnutrition. Villous Atrophy can result in limiting the ability of the small intestines to absorb nutrients from food. At the most serious stages, villous atrophy causes damage to the intestinal crypts, which is the intestinal lining that surround the villi.
Benicar Villous Atrophy Lawyers Filing Benicar LawsuitsBenicar has been used by millions of people. Benicar warnings did not adequately disclose how serious the side effects form this medication is. The Benicar lawyers at Class Action Lawyer Network are filing claims for individuals who have experienced chronic diarrhea, sprue-like enteropathy or villous atrophy after using Benicar.
Hemorrhages Caused by Xarelto
Xarelto Lawyers Filing Extensive Bleeding LawsuitsOur Xarelto lawyers are accepting Xarelto lawsuits for hemorrhage caused by Xarelto. Nationwide Xarelto attorneys are reviewing cases of excessive bleeding from Xarelto. In a recent Xareleto lawsuit a widow from Missouri has filed an Xarelto claim against Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Research & Development, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, et al. to demand that the defendants be held liable for the death of her husband. Dixie A. Smith, surviving spouse of Jay Christopher Smith, filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, where it joins similar lawsuits pending in multidistrict litigation (MDL) No. 2592 before Judge Fallon. The plaintiff contends that had her late husband never taken the defendants’ medication, Xarelto, he would not have suffered a deadly intracerebral hemorrhage. Ms. Smith is suing for compensatory damages for past, present, and future economic expenditures incurred as a result of the decedent’s use of Xarelto, including medical and funeral expenses, loss of earnings, loss of companionship and support, and loss of the prospective net accumulations of an estate. Xarelto Caused A Brain Hemorrhage The decedent’s physician prescribed Xarelto (rivaroxaban) during December of 2012. He continued to take the medication as prescribed until May of 2013. On May 4, the decedent was admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), at which point the hospital staff discontinued his use of Xarelto. He was transferred to the care of a specialty hospital unit on May 18 and on May 22 he died of the intracerebral hemorrhage. According to Ms. Smith’s Xarelto lawsuit, her late husband’s passing was a direct result of his use of rivaroxaban, which he reportedly never would have taken had he been fully informed of the risks. Xarelto is an anticoagulant or blood thinner that is prescribed for the treatment and prevention of blood clots. The medication is intended to reduce the risk of life-threatening complications caused by blood clots, including pulmonary embolism and stroke. Xarelto Lawsuits The product liability lawsuit regarding Xarelto draws attention to several reviews and clinical studies of the drug, including a 2012 report issued by The Institute for Safe Medication Practices. This report stated that there had been “356 reports of serious, disabling, or fatal injury in which rivaroxaban was the primary suspect drug. The report more than doubled from the previous quarter total of 128 cases.” The organization brought these statistics to the attention of the defendants, who reportedly advised The Institute for Safe Medication Practices that the data did not reflect any safety issues that required action. Ms. Smith’s Xarelto lawsuit alleges that the defendants prioritized profit over patient safety. Her complaint further claims that the defendants concealed their knowledge of the severe and life-threatening complications of Xarelto from consumers and the medical community. The lawsuit notes that the pharmaceutical giants failed to highlight the risks of uncontrollable bleeding events, nor did they provide medical protocols for stabilizing patients suffering from these bleeding events. Xarelto had been marketed as a replacement for an older blood thinner, warfarin (Coumadin). Warfarin has been used for years for patients who may be at a higher risk of blood clots. However, patients taking warfarin required regular medical monitoring and dietary restrictions, which Xarelto had promised to eliminate. Our Xarelto lawyers have been reviewing claims for excessive bleeding like these. Xarelto lawsuits are now consolidated in an MDL because many people have suffered injuries of a same type from Xarelto. Speak to an Xarelto lawyer today.
Lawyers Filing Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits For Baby Powder
Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Do You Want To File A Baby Powder Cancer Lawsuit?Studies show that talcum-based powder can cause ovarian cancer in women who have used it for genital/perineal hygiene. Studies dating back to 1982 have consistently linked prolonged talc-based baby and body powder usage with ovarian cancer. The talc particles moves through the female reproductive system and settles in the ovaries. These particles may remain in the ovaries for many years, creating inflammation resulting in the development and proliferation of cancer cells. Studies HAVE Linked Ovarian Cancer to Talc-Based Baby/Body Powder The pathology reports and tissue samples that were used to diagnose the ovarian cancer can now be examined to determine whether your ovarian tissues contain talc particles. Talc particles can be found in the pelvic lymph nodes, ovaries, and fallopian tubes and take many years to disintegrate and exit the body. The talcum powder cancer lawyers at Class Action Lawyer Network are speaking to women about talc having caused your ovarian cancer.
Speak To A Talcum Powder LawyerIf you have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer after long term use of talcum-based products, such as Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder, Shower to Shower, and others we want to talk to you regarding filing a talcum powder cancer lawsuit.
Florida Vaginal Mesh Class Action Lawyers Still Accepting Cases
As many states begin to drop off the list for filing a vaginal mesh lawsuit, Florida with a 4 year product liability statute of limitations is still bringing in cases for women who are suffering from the faulty mesh. We are getting calls for lawyers to file cases in the vaginal mesh class action lawsuit from:
Hollywood, Coral Springs,
Port Saint Lucie,
Florida women can still file a vaginal mesh pelvic repair lawsuit for a Prolene mesh implanted for SUI-urinary incontinence or POP-Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Many women have complications. Florida has a very large population of women over the age of 50. Post menopause may result in a weakening of the pelvic support muscle in some women. When these muscles weaken SUI and POP can be the result. We see a large number of mesh repair surgeries in Florida. Florida women can still file their surgical mesh lawsuit in one of the centralized multi-district litigation lawsuits under Judge Goodwin in West Virginia.
Trans Vaginal mesh lawsuit MDL – 2325, IN RE: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
Pelvic mesh repair mesh lawsuit MDL – 2326 IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
Pelvic mesh repair mesh lawsuit MDL – 2327 IN RE: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
Pelvic mesh repair mesh lawsuit MDL – 2387 IN RE: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation
Pelvic mesh lawsuit Cook Medical Surgical will be the fifth MDL
Speak to one of our vaginal mesh class action lawyers today.
Did The Manufacturers Of The Transvaginal Mesh And Bladder Sling Give Sufficient Warning?
Boston Vaginal Mesh Lawyers say no in the thousands of transvaginal mesh and bladder sling claims that have been filed in the Pelvic Mesh Repair Lawsuits MDL'Ls.
According to transvaginal mesh lawyers accross the country who are filing vaginal mesh and bladder sling lawsuits the warning was insufficient. For a warning to be sufficient, a transvaginal mesh warning should appropriately signal danger while simultaneously providing the information in order to use the product appropriately. A pharmaceutical or medical device manufacturer doesn’t necessarily have to discuss matters that are basic medical knowledge. They are not in a position to control the individual practices of doctors in every single medical community.
Will The Device Warnings The Transvaginal meshmanufacturers provided to the doctor relieve them of their duty to warn the patient.
What are some ways that warnings can become inadequate? Some variables that courts will consider include: If they are overly broad or too generic, contradictory statements made in the inserts, actions by the sales representatives, and presenting the warning in a way that makes it unlikely to be read. Remember, every case is different. In some cases, a doctor might not even bother to read the warnings. In other cases, the possibility of an adverse reaction is too small to even impact the doctor’s decision. There have even been cases where a doctor has stated that even if he were given new information, he would have still followed through with his initial decision.
What other possible legal theories being explored? If a company supplies product related information to the public that amounts to an express warranty, they can be held liable for breach of warranty if the plaintiff can successfully prove that the information was false.
We will be watching the pelvic mesh repair proceedings and waiting to see how they play out.
To file a Transvagina, mesh lawsuit for a Prolene mesh surgicall implanted in: D.C., Daytona, Fort Myers, Ft Lauderdale, Gainesville, Jacksonville, Keys, Lakeland, Miami, Ocala, Orlando, Panama City, Pensacola, Sarasota, St. Augustine, Boston, Springfield, Worcester, Ann Arbor, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Jackson, Lansing, Minneapolis, St Paul, Charlotte. Fayetteville, Greensboro, Raleigh, Wilmington, Winston Salem, Fargo, Providence, Charleston, Columbia, Florence, Greenville, Seattle, Tacoma, Charleston, Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Cheyenne, Casper, Laramie, Gillette, Milwaukee, Montana, Billings, Springfield, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Omaha ,Manchester, Albuquerque, Charlotte, Raleigh, Greensboro, Winston-Salem, Durham, Fayetteville, Wilmington, Providence, Charleston Seattle, Milwaukee, Madison, Green Bay, Casper or Laramie call Class Action Lawyer Network transvaginal mesh attorneys today.
Gynemesh Class Action Lawyers are filing lawsuits against the manufacturers of the Gynemesh transvsagina mesh Implant in 3, 4, 5 and 6 year product liability statute states.
Our Gynemesh Class Action Lawyers Are Accepting Transvaginal mesh Lawsuits
For Gynemesh Vaginal Mesh Surgically Implanted In The Following 3, 4, 5 and 6 year product liability statute states.
D.C, Florida, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Ethicon Gynecare Prolift Pelvic Mesh Lawsuits For Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh
Ethicon Gynecare Prosima Pelvic Mesh
Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh
Ethicon Prolene Mesh
Ethicon Gynecare TVT Sling
An Ethicon Gynemesh vaginal mesh or bladder sling lawsuits are being filed for women who have experienced complications.
Gynemesh Complications Include
- Erosion of the Mesh
- Urinary Problems
- Digestive problems
- Pelvic Pain
- Re Prolapse
- Injury to Nearby Organs
- Difficulty during intimacy
The FDA has received reports of problems with Ethicon Gynemesh vaginal mesh implants
Overview Of Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh
Gynecare Gynemesh was first introduced in October 2002. Gynemesh is also called the Gynecare GynemeshPS, nonabsorbable Prolene Soft Mesh, for vaginal wall prolapse surgical treatment.
What Is Ethicon Gynemesh?
Ethicon Gynemesh is porous, which allows surrounding tissues to grow into and incorporate the material as part of the body, which can create severe complications. If you are a victim of a faulty Gynemesh Vaginal Mesh
Speak To A Gynemesh Lawsuit Attorney Today