Class Action Article

  • File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit: Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Talcum Powder Fallopian Tube Cancer Lawsuits Baby  Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Filed If you or a loved one used talcum powder products and were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, or fallopian tube can...

Class Action News

Drug Class Actions

  • Taxotere Lawyers for Permanent Hair Loss: Taxotere Baldness Lawyers For  Permanent Hair Loss Lawsuits Have you received Taxotere for breast cancer? Taxotere can result in hair loss or baldness  that is permanent. Taxotere  is a chemotherapy drug used for the treatment of breas...

Medical Device Lawsuits

  • Zimmer Hip Replacement Lawyers: Network Zimmer Hip Replacement  Lawyer Win $2 Million Against Zimmer Hip Replacement Do You Have A Faulty Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prothesis With Connective Technology and Cobalt Chromium Head? Do You Have Have Metallosis or Chromium Cobalt T...

Posts Tagged ‘GranuFlo lawyers’

Stryker Femoral Heads Hip Replacement Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News, Stryker femoral head hip Implant lawyer

Stryker V40 Taper Hip Replacement Lawyers Stryker Hip Replacement Lawyers

Hip Implant lawyers are filing hip replacement lawsuits for V40 Femoral head failure in the Stryker Hip Implant. In August 2016, Stryker contacted implanting physicians about metal wear associated with its V40 Taper when used with some cobalt chromium heads.Stryker Orthopaedics sent an Urgent Medical Device Recall Notification to orthopedic surgeons. The recall involves certain sizes of LIFT™ Anatomic CoCr V40™ Femoral Heads manufactured prior to 2011. If you had a LIFT- V40 Femoral Head implanted during total hip replacement, you should be watching for a letter from your surgeon in the next few weeks. You may also be getting a letter from Stryker or a company hired by Stryker to handle claims.

 Stryker Recall Metal V 40 Femoral Heads Lawsuits

Stryker has voluntarily recalled some of their metal V40 femoral heads used with hip implants. Stryker hip replacement lawyers are interested in speaking to anyone with a failed: Exeter, Citation, Meridian, Reliance, Definition, Restoration, Accolade Rejuvenate ABG 2 stems.

This failure may be due to the problems with the V40 femoral head.

The failure of these heads is caused by corrosion and metal debris at the junction between the metal head and neck. The clinical results for patients include pain, loss of mobility, ambulation problems and an inability to work. Poisoning of the soft tissue, muscle and bone are the cause. Revision surgeries may be needed due to premature failures. Stryker lawyers  are seeking patients with  LFit V40 femoral heads made before 2011.

What Is The Femoral Head  Problem?

This is a ball for total hip replacements that can be attached to hip stems, including the Accolade TMZF, Accolade 2, Meridian, and Citation. There have been numerous incidents  of taper lock failures on LFit V40 femoral heads made before 2011,  This taper lock connects the “ball” part of the hip joint to the  hip stem that is inserted in the femur. When it breaks the femoral head will detach from the femoral neck.

Get A Stryker Hip Implant Lawyer

Our Stryker Hip Replacement lawyers are currently accepting Stryker LFit V40 failure cases.

Lawyers For Drugs and Devices

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in ABG II Lawyers, ABG Modular Stem lawyers, Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Asbestos, Baby Powder lawyer, Bair Hugger Surgical Blanket lawyer, Baltimore, Bard IVC Filter Lawyers, Blood Clot Filter lawyer, Boca Raton, Boston, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Charleston, Charlotte, Cincinnattti Talcum Powder lawyer, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Dallas, Denver, DePuy Pinnacle Hip Replacement Updates, Detroit, File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit, Fort Lauderdale, Fort Lauderdale GranuFlo Lawyer, GranuFlo Dialysis Medication Lawyers, Granuflo Lawyer, Heartbuen medication lawyer, Heartburn Medication lawyer, Houston, Idaho Talcum Powder Lawyer, Infuse Bone Graft Lawywrs, Invokana Lawyers, Johnson and Johnson Baby Powder Lawsuit, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Little Rock Talcum Powder Lawyer, Los Angeles, Louisville, Macon, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mass tort lawyer, Metronic Infuse Bone Graft Lawsuit, Miami, Minneapolis, NexGen Knee Replacement lawyers, NYC, NYC Class Action Lawyers, Philadelphia Amtrak Crash, Philadelphia Baby powder lawyer, Phoenix, Power Morcellator Lawyers, Provo, Raleigh-Durham, Risperdal Lawyers, Sarasota, Seattle, SSRI Birth Defects Lawyer, Stryker Hip replacement recall lawyer, Stryker Homedicam Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate Hip replacement recall lawyers, Talcum Powder cancer lawyers, Talcum Powder Ovarian cancer lawyer, Taxotere Lawyer, Toledo, Tylenol Liver Damage Lawsuits, West Palm Beach, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Xarelto Lawyer, Xarelto Lawyers, Zimmer Knee Replacement lawyer

Lawyers For Drugs & Devices Our Class Action – Dangerous Drugs and Devices Lawyers are accepting cases for :

Abilify lawyers- excessive gambling, Bair Hugger Warming Blanket Lawyers, Benicar Lawyers, Biomet Hip Replacement, da Vinci Robotic Surgery, Depakote, DePuy Hip Replacement, DePuy Knee Replacement, GranuFlo lawyers, Hip Replacement lawyers, INFUSE Bone Graft lawyers, Invokana lawyers, IVC Filters lawyers, Januvia lawyers, NaturaLyte lawyers, Nexium lawyers- kidney failure, Power Morcellators, Talcum Powder ovarian cancer lawyers, Taxotere permanent baldness lawyers, Testosterone heart attack lawyers, Xarelto excessive bleeding lawyers, Zofran birth defect lawyers

About Filing A Dangerous Drugs or Devices Lawsuit

All dangerous drug and devices lawsuits have specific criteria for acceptance of your case. You must meet the criteria. many of these drug and devices lawsuits have been consolidated in a multi-district litigation. The judge has set the criteria for the lawsuit. You will be asked specific questions regarding your medical history, date you were implanted with the device or began using the medication, and if you are still using the medication or have had the device removed or revised in any way. Contact us to speak to an experienced drug and devices lawyer. These cases can be accepted for your local jurisdiction but, more often, they will be filed in the state where the lawsuits have been consolidated. These mass tort consolidated cases have a steering committee which is made up of selected lawyers and lead counsels. They are the only lawyers that  will litigate the cases. You do not need a local lawyer. Most lawyers whi accept these cases refer them to an experienced mass tort lawyer who is not local. You need an experienced mass tort lawyer.

GranuFlo Lawyer Update, Dialysis Medication Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class Action Articles

GranuFlo, Naturalyte, Dialysis medication lawsuit lawyers announce an new update in the dialysis medication lawsuits. Dialysis medication lawyers continue to file immediate heart attack lawsuits.Granuflo Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Fresenius Dialysis Treatment

Fresenius Medical Care faces a class action lawsuit in Pennsylvania, brought on behalf of individuals who suffered sudden heart complications during dialysis treatments involving the company’s GranuFlo solution, which has been linked to hundreds of deaths in recent years.

The complaint was filed by Carmen Brysten in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas on June 14, seeking class action status to include all Pennsylvania residents who received GranuFlo dialysis treatment and suffered a cardiac arrest, sudden heart-related death or cardiac events.

Brysten brought the Granuflo class action lawsuit following the death of her husband, Filmon Brysten, in November 2011. That same month, Fresenius issued an internal memo to doctors at their own dialysis clinics warning about the risk of problems with Granuflo, which may increase bicarbonate levels to higher than expected levels and cause users to suffer a sudden heart attack or death.

“Based on the knowledge readily available to the medical community as early as 2004, Fresenius knew or should have known of the increased risk of metabolic alkalosis attributed to the use of GranuFlo long before the publication of its November 4, 2011 internal memorandum detailing the problem to Fresenius physicians and clinics,” the lawsuit states. “Despite this knowledge, Fresenius failed to inform physicians that GranuFlo increases the level of bicarbonate in patients, thus preventing physicians and/or clinicians from learning of the need to reduce the bicarbonate prescribed to patients undergoing dialysis with GranuFlo.”

Although Fresenius provided an internal memo to their own clinics in November 2011, the company failed to provide similar warnings to other dialysis centers that used Granuflo. After the internal memo was leaked to the FDA, Fresenius did issue a public warning in March 2012, which the FDA classified as a Granuflo recall.
Fresnius Lawsuits Over Granuflo Dialysis Treatments

Fresenius Medical Care owns and operates thousands of dialysis clinics throughout the United States. However, the company also manufactures dialysis products and machines used at other centers.

Granuflo is a dry acid concentrate that has been commonly used during hemodialysis treatments throughout the United States. A similar product is marketed by Fresenius as NaturaLyte, which is a liquid acid concentrate.

Side effects of Granuflo and Naturalyte require doctors to carefully monitor patient bicarbonate levels during treatments. The manufacturer has been accused of withholding the information from the medical community, resulting in sudden cardiac arrest during or shortly after hemodialysis.

In addition to the class action lawsuit in Pennsylvania, Fresenius faces more than 160 GranuFlo dialysis treatment lawsuits have been filed in federal courts nationwide.

In March, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued an order consolidating the federal court Fresenius dialysis treatment litigation before U.S. District Judge Douglas P. Woodlock in the District of Massachusetts, where the cases will be coordinated during pretrial proceedings as part of an MDL or multidistrict litigation. It is ultimately expected that hundreds, if not thousands, of cases are likely to be filed over problems with Granuflo or NaturaLyte.

FDA Medical Device Recalls in 2012, Class Action Recall Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

 Our lawyers are filing GranuFlo and Naturalyte dialysis medication lawsuits for injury and death for batch 2008-2012

Device Name Date
    GE Healthcare T-Piece Circuits for the Giraffe and Panda Resuscitation Systems  12/28/12
    Zimmer Spine, Inc. – PEEK Ardis Inserter  12/28/12
    Ventlab Corporation Adult and Pediatric Manual Resuscitators  12/21/12
    Bunnell Incorporated, Life Pulse High-Frequency Ventilator Patient Circuits  12/21/12
    Medtronic SynchroMed II Implantable Drug Infusion Pump and SynchroMed EL Implantable Drug Infusion Pump  12/21/12
    Ethicon, Inc., SURGIFLO Hemostatic Matrix and SURGIFLO Hemostatic Matrix Kit Plus FlexTip with Thrombin  12/13/12
    Verathon, Inc., Certain GlideScope Video Laryngoscope Reusable Blades  12/12/12
    Natus Medical Incorporated, Olympic Cool-Cap System (Revised)  12/12/12
    Mindray A3 and A5 Anesthesia Delivery System  11/30/12
    HeartSine Samaritan Public Access Defibrillator 300/300P  11/19/12
    Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Buretrol Solution Sets  11/08/12
    Touchscreen for Hospira Symbiq Infusion System, Models 16026 and 16027  10/26/12
    Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. Proximate PPH Hemorrhoidal Circular Stapler and Accessories 33mm, Proximate HCS Hemorrhoidal Circular Stapler and Accessories 33mm and the Transtar Circular Stapler Procedure Set  10/24/12
    Stryker Instruments, Neptune Rover Waste Management Systems  10/24/12
    Accutron, Inc. Ultra PC% Cabinet Mount Flowmeters for Nitrous Oxide-Oxygen Sedation Systems  10/16/12
    Custom Medical Specialties, Inc., Custom HSG Tray, Hysteroscopic Sterilization Pack, Custom Vein Tray, Custom Amnio Tray, Fox Chase Specials Pack, Abington Radiology Drainage Pack, Custom CT Biopsy Tray, HSG Tray, Custom Myelogram Tray, and Hysteroscopy Sterile Procedure Kit  09/25/12
    I-Flow ON-Q Pump with ONDEMAND Bolus Button  08/31/12
    Baxter Healthcare Corporation, Automix Automated Nutrition Compounder Systems  08/29/12
    CareFusion Alaris Pump Module, Model 8100 – Motor Stall  08/23/12
    CareFusion Alaris Pump Module, Model 8100 – Keyboard Overlay  08/22/12
    Synthes Hemostatic Bone Putty  08/21/12
    Certain Covidien Shiley Adult Tracheostomy Tubes  08/15/12
    Smiths Medical Medfusion Model 4000 Syringe Infusion Pump  08/02/12
    Respironics, Inc., Trilogy 100, 200, and 202 Ventilators  08/02/12
    B. Braun Infusomat Space Infusion System – Expansion of Recall from January, 2012  08/01/12
    CareFusion Alaris PC Unit, Model 8015  08/01/12
    Arrow International, Inc. (subsidiary of Teleflex, Inc.), Multi-Lumen Venous Catheterization Set with Blue FlexTip ARROWg+ard Catheter  07/30/12
    CareFusion EnVe Ventilators (Distributed 12/2010 – 05/2012)  07/20/12
    Maquet Medical Systems USA, FLOW-i Anesthesia System (software)  07/11/12
    Alere, Triage (Multiple Tests)  07/11/12
    GE Healthcare, LLC, Aestiva/5 7900 Ventilator  07/11/12
    CareFusion 2200 Inc., Care Fusion Airlife Infant Breathing Circuit  07/06/12
    Fresenius Medical Care North America, Naturalyte and Granuflo Acid Concentrate  06/27/12 ( Lawsuits filed )
    Nidek Medical Products, Inc., Mark 5 Nuvo, Nuvo 8 and Nuvo Lite Oxygen Concentrators  06/21/12
    SIGMA Spectrum Infusion Pump Model 35700 – Expanded Recall  06/15/12
    MOOG Medical Devices Group, Curlin Infusion Administration Sets  05/31/12
    Pharmaceutical Innovations, Inc, Other-Sonic Generic Ultrasound Transmission Gel  05/30/12
    Baxa Corporation Abacus Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) Calculation Software  05/25/12
    Roche Diagnostics Operations, Inc., Elecsys Troponin I and Elecsys Troponin I STAT Immunoassays  04/24/12
    Thoratec Corporation, HeartMate II Left Ventricular Assist System (LVAS)  04/04/12
    Acclarent Inspira AIR Balloon Dilation System, size 18X40mm.  03/13/12
    Cardiac Science Powerheart, CardioVive, CardioLife; GE Responder and Responder Pro; and Nihon-Kohden Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs)  03/02/12
    Flight Medical V24-00400-29 Cable for Newport HT50 Ventilator  02/28/12
    Nemschoff Chairs, Inc., Perinatal Pediatric Hospital Bed (Bassinet)  02/24/12
    Smiths Medical Bivona Neonatal, Pediatric and Flextend Tracheostomy Tubes  02/23/12
    CareFusion NicoletOne Software Used with CareFusion Cortical Stimulator Control Unit  02/22/12
    Salter Labs 7600 Bubble Humidifier Used with Supplemental Oxygen Therapy  02/13/12
    Respironics, Inc. Trilogy 100 Ventilators  01/12/12
    Ikaria INOmax DS Drug Delivery System  01/04/12

FDA Quick Review Process, Dangerous Drugs And Devices Pushed Thru On The Fast Track

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Class Action lawyers Filing lawsuits for vaginal mesh, Bladder sling, Stryker Hip replacements and other Hip replacements, GranuFlo, Actos, Pradaxa, Mirena IUD, and many others. Many devices harming victims were pushed thru on the FDA fast track process.

Medical Devices and the Public’s Health: The FDA 510(k) Clearance Process at 35 Years

Released:
    July 29, 2011
Type:
    Consensus Report
Topics:
    Public Health, Quality and Patient Safety
Activity:
    Public Health Effectiveness of the FDA 510(k) Clearance Process
Board:
    Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice

Medical devices play a critical role in the health care of Americans. They can range from simple tools, such as tongue depressors and bandages, to complex or life-saving equipment, such as pacemakers, magnetic resonance imaging machines, and heart–lung machines. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) requires a "reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness" before a device can be marketed, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for enforcing this requirement. Devices that are deemed to have a moderate risk to patients generally cannot go on the market until they are cleared through the 510(k) process, named for Section 510(k) of the FFDCA.  Some policymakers and patients have expressed concern about the ability of the 510(k) process to ensure that medical devices on the market are safe and effective. Other policymakers and patients, as well as the medical-device industry, have asserted that the process has become too burdensome and time-consuming and that it is delaying important new medical devices from entering the market.

The FDA turned to the IOM to review the 510(k) process and answer two questions:

    Does the current 510(k) process protect patients optimally and promote innovation in support of public health?
    If not, what legislative, regulatory, or administrative changes are recommended to achieve the goals of the 510(k) process optimally

The IOM finds that the current 510(k) process is flawed based on its legislative foundation. Rather than continuing to modify the 35-year-old 510(k) process, the IOM concludes that the FDA’s finite resources would be better invested in developing an integrated premarket and postmarket regulatory framework that provides a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness throughout the device life cycle. The IOM outlines its criteria for this framework in the report.

Stryker Rejuvinate Lawsuits, Stryker Hip Replacement Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Medical Device Lawsuits

Stryker Hip Replacement lawyers are filing lawsuits for injury from the newly recalled Stryker Rejuvinate Hip Replacement.

Stryker issued a recall of two component hip parts related to their Trident hip replacement system in 2008, as a number of patients came forward with assertions of pain related to their Trident hip implants. In addition, squeaking and popping sounds and sensations were reported by a number of patients, which could be embarrassing as well as indicative of other complications associated with the products. Some patients reported even more serious complications, including implant failure and bone fractures. A number of these patients had to undergo revision surgery in order to correct them.

A number of victims have chosen  file a Stryker hip replacement lawsuit lafter experiencing serious complications linked to the devices, and a consolidation of a number of lawsuits has taken place. Some lawsuits have been consolidated in the New Jersey Superior Court of Atlantic County and are being presided over by Judge Carol Higbee.

If you have been injured by a Stryker Rejuvinate Hip replacement recall contact us to review your medical records to see if you have a claim against the manufacturer

Stryker Hip Replacement Lawyers, Stryker Hip Replacement Recall News

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Product Recall News, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

The Stryker Rejuvenate Hip Recall for metal toxicity was a surprise to many patients and doctors because it is not a metal on metal hip. In fact, many patients selected this hip to avoid the metallosis problem that has been in the news for the last two years since the DePuy ASR metal on metal recall in August of 2010.

The Stryker Rejuvenate hip is made with a ceramic ball and a polyethylene liner in the acetabular cup. The recalled DePuy ASR and the recalled Smith & Nephew R3 hips both have a metal ball and a metal cup which is called a metal on metal articulation. The problem with the metal on metal hips is that the metal on metal interface generates metallic debris that is toxic to the tissues in the hip compartment causing fluid buildup, tissue damage, and failure of the implant.

A lawsuit claiming that Stryker Corporation was negligent and did not adequately warn patients about the risks associated with its Trident hip replacement system was filed in the Superior Court of the State of Indiana for the County of Marion by plaintiff Darlene A. Gray. On the 5th of September, 2012, the suit was removed under federal diversity jurisdiction. The lawsuit claims that plaintiff Gray had the Trident hip system implanted after suffering from avascular necrosis of the right hip for a number of years, however, the device failed much earlier than what would be reasonably expected, she was forced to undergo Stryker revision surgery in order to correct complications she was experiencing as a result of her implant.
Recall issued over parts

Stryker issued a recall of two component hip parts related to their Trident hip replacement system in 2008, as a number of patients came forward with assertions of pain related to their Trident hip implants. In addition, squeaking and popping sounds and sensations were reported by a number of patients, which could be embarrassing as well as indicative of other complications associated with the products. Some patients reported even more serious complications, including implant failure and bone fractures. A number of these patients had to undergo revision surgery in order to correct them.

The plaintiff is seeking compensation based on damages associated with medical expenses and pain and suffering that she has experienced as a result of her use of the allegedly defective product. She is making claims of negligence and defective product claims against Stryker Orthopedics.
Lawsuits consolidated in New Jersey

A number of patients have chosen to go ahead with Stryker hip litigation after experiencing serious complications linked to the devices, and a consolidation of a number of lawsuits has taken place. Some lawsuits have been consolidated in the New Jersey Superior Court of Atlantic County and are being presided over by Judge Carol Higbee.

GranuFlo Recall, GranuFlo Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

 GranuFlo recall announced causing sudden heart attacks and death. GranuFlo lawyers filing lawsuits.

FDA Issues GranuFlo Recall
Elise Kramer | September 13th, 2012 | Posted in GranuFlo Lawsuits, Injury Lawsuit News

The Food and Drug Administration issued a recall of the dialysis products GranuFlo and NaturaLyte on the 29th of March, 2012, after a memo from drug maker Fresenius Medical Care was leaked to the public. These products are used during hemodialysis in order to remove toxins from the bloodstream of a patient whose kidneys are not functioning properly; however, GranuFlo and NaturaLyte have been linked to an increased risk of heart attack and sudden death. A number of patients who have experienced these side effects or whose loved ones have experienced them have filed suit against the drug manufacturer in the hopes of gaining compensation for the injuries.
Dangerous side effects linked to products

GranuFlo and NaturaLyte are similar products which were both designed to reduce the build-up of acid in the blood and to utilize bicarbonate in order to neutralize acids. However, these products are different from their competitors in that they use greater concentrations of bicarbonate, which can lead to serious health issues especially if doctors miscalculate the proper and safe dosage. Fatal overdoses, which can cause sudden death, and heart attacks are the most serious side effects of this product.

Fresenius Medical Care published an internal memo on the 4th of November, 2011, regarding risks associated with their product. A reported 941 patients had suffered heart attacks linked to the use of these products, and the memo detailed these “troubling findings”. Medical staff were informed that the problem needed to be “addressed urgently.” However, no contact was made with the Food and Drug Administration about these concerns, and no public warning was issued to patients at risk for GranuFlo related side effects. The memo was leaked to the Food and Drug Administration, which prompted a recall of the products.
Recall leads to individual lawsuits

Patients alerted to the recall suddenly may have been able to connect adverse health events that they had experienced to the use of GranuFlo, and many have hired GranuFlo attorneys in an effort to seek compensation that could help cover injury-related costs they have accumulated.

New Dangerous Medical Devices, Medical Device Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Medical Device Lawsuits

The Following dangerous medical devices have been added to the list of dangerous devices our lawyers are accepting clients for. These include:

  •     AlloDerm Lawyers,
  •     Bard IVC Filter Lawyers,
  •     Charite Artificial Disc Lawyers,
  •     Metronic Injuse Bone Graft Lawyers,
  •     Mirena IUD lawyers for uterus perforation
  •     Stryker Rejuvenate Lawyers.,
  •     ABG II modular-neck stem Lawyers
  •     Depuy ASR Hip Implant Lawyers, statute of limitations up in many states
  •     Modular-Neck Hip Stems by Stryker Orthopedics Lawyers,
  •     R3 Acetabular System Hip Replacement Lawyers,
  •     Vaginal Mesh Lawyers.
  •     Dow Corning Breast Implant Lawyers

Manufacturers of medical devices are also liable for harm caused by their products. Sometimes these products contain design flaws, were not tested adequately, or were marketed to doctors and patients for uses other than those approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Examples of medical devices include: defibrillators, breast and other cosmetic implants, orthopedic screws, hip implants, knee implants, heart valves and many other items.