Posts Tagged ‘hallandale’
Xarelto Lawsuit Attorney Helpline
About XareltoXarelto is an anticoagulant prescribed to prevent blood clots in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolisms, or stroke.It is also prescribed for patients who have undergone a knee or hip replacement surgery to avoid clotting. The Xarelto Helpline is concerned about seniors prescribed Xarelto. Bayer and Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen Pharmaceuticals are the manufacturers of Xarelto. Lawsuits claim these manufacturers’ neglected to warn patients of Xarelto side effects. Our Xarelto lawyers are accepting Xarelto lawsuits for extensive bleeding side effects from Xarelto. The Xarelto Helpline is helping victims of Xarelto connect with an Xarelto lawyer.
Xarelto lawsuits are being filed for Xarelto bleeding victims:Xarelto internal bleeding lawsuits, Xarelto hemorrhagic stroke lawsuits, Xarelto gastrointestinal bleeding lawsuits, Xarelto brain bleed lawsuits, Xarelto death due to irreversible bleeding
Get An Xarelto LawyerIf you, a loved one or someone you care for has been injured by using the anti-coagulant drug Xarelto, it is imperative that you speak to an Xarelto attorney. Speak to one of our Xarelto lawyers today for your free case consultation.
Xarelto Extensive Bleeding Lawyers For:
- Death caused by uncontrolled bleeding
- Intestinal bleeding
- Brain hemorrhage
IVC Filter Lawyers Advise – Bard IVC Filter Lawsuits ConsolidatedBard IVC Filter lawsuits have been transferred to a federal court in Arizona. IVC Filter lawyers of Class Action Lawyer Network will help victims injured by the defective IVC filters.
IVC Filter MDLA transfer order filed Monday, in the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), resulted in all present and future federal product liability lawsuits against inferior vena cava filter (IVC filter) manufacturers, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. (BPV), to be centralized in a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the District of Arizona.
What Are IVC Filters?IVC filters are surgical implants that catch blood clots before they travel to the lungs to avoid causing a pulmonary embolism. The Bard IVC Filter devices are fracturing, tilting, migrating, or puncturing the vena cava.
FDA Vena Cava Filter WarningsThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a safety warning in 2010, citing that more than 900 IVC Filter adverse event reports were filed over five years A study published in the April 2013 edition of Jama Internal Medicine, found that less than 10% of retrievable IVC filters surveyed were successfully removed. They also reported that 8% of persons surveyed still suffered venous thrombotic events while the IVC filter was in place. In 2014, the FDA issued an updated warning to doctors recommending that IVC filters be removed within one to two months once the need for the filter has passed. They noted that doctors may not have previously been made aware of the urgency surrounding retrieval of the device.
IVC Filter LawyersIVC filter lawyers will help you get compensation as part of the Bard IVC filter MDL, which has been consolidated to the U.S. District Court of Arizona.
Lawyers Filing Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits For Baby Powder
Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Do You Want To File A Baby Powder Cancer Lawsuit?Studies show that talcum-based powder can cause ovarian cancer in women who have used it for genital/perineal hygiene. Studies dating back to 1982 have consistently linked prolonged talc-based baby and body powder usage with ovarian cancer. The talc particles moves through the female reproductive system and settles in the ovaries. These particles may remain in the ovaries for many years, creating inflammation resulting in the development and proliferation of cancer cells. Studies HAVE Linked Ovarian Cancer to Talc-Based Baby/Body Powder The pathology reports and tissue samples that were used to diagnose the ovarian cancer can now be examined to determine whether your ovarian tissues contain talc particles. Talc particles can be found in the pelvic lymph nodes, ovaries, and fallopian tubes and take many years to disintegrate and exit the body. The talcum powder cancer lawyers at Class Action Lawyer Network are speaking to women about talc having caused your ovarian cancer.
Speak To A Talcum Powder LawyerIf you have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer after long term use of talcum-based products, such as Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder, Shower to Shower, and others we want to talk to you regarding filing a talcum powder cancer lawsuit.
Did you take actos for 1 year or longer? Were you diagnosed with bladder cancer?
You may have a lawsuit against the manufacturers of Actos.
Actos is a medication taken by Type II ( adult onset ) diabetics to control their insulin production. Actos lawsuits are being filed for victims of bladder cancer from Actos.
Actos Lawsuit Overview
Actos lawsuits allege that long-term use of this Type 2 diabetes drug caused patients to develop bladder cancer . These continue to move forward in a multidistrict litigation underway in U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana. According to court documents, the proceeding’s next Case Management Conference will be held on Thursday, October 24, 2013, at 10:30 a.m. (In re: Actos Product Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2299)
Actos Multi District Litigation
According to court documents Actos litigation involving bladder cancer lawsuits mounted up shortly after the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) warned in June 2011 that use of the drug for 12 months or more had been associated with an increased risk of the disease. At that time, the FDA ordered Takeda Pharmaceuticals to add new warnings to the Actos label about its potential to cause bladder cancer.
Court filings indicate that more than 2,500 Actos lawsuits are now pending in the Western District of Louisiana, where the first case will go to trial in January. Plaintiffs in Actos lawsuits allege that Takeda Pharmaceuticals and other defendants concealed knowledge that the medication could increase a person’s chances of developing bladder cancer, and failed to provide adequate warnings about that risk to the public and medical community.
On the state level, two Actos claims involving bladder cancer allegations have already gone to trial. Last month, a Maryland State Court jury awarded $1.7 million to the family of a man who died of bladder cancer following long-term use of Actos. However, according to court records, the judge presiding over the trial tossed out the verdict because the jury also found that the decedent’s decades-long smoking habit contributed to the development of the disease. (An v. Nieberlein, 24-C12003565, Circuit Court for the City of Baltimore, State of Maryland.)
This past April, a Los Angeles Superior Court jury awarded $6.5 million to a plaintiff who developed bladder cancer following four years of Actos use. However, the plaintiff is currently appealing a decision by the judge overseeing the case to grant Takeda Pharmaceuticals’ request to set aside the verdict. (Cooper v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc., CGC-12-518535, California Superior Court)
Long-term users of Actos ( over 2 years ) who have been diagnosed with bladder cancer may be eligible to file an Actos lawsuit against Takeda Pharmaceuticals.
Can I File An Actos Lawsuit?
1. You must have taken Actos for over one year
2. You must have a confirmed diagnosis of bladder cancer
3. You must have no prior medical history of baldder cancer prior to taking Actos
Pradaxa Lawsuit News and Updates
The Pradaxa lawsuits are moving forward. The Pradaxa lawyers advise all victims and families of extensive bleeding from Pradaxa to file their Pradaxa lawsuit by callingour Pradaxa hotline rigjht away. The Pradaxa lawsuits are being filed in MDL 2385 – Pradaxa (Dabigatran Etexilate) Products Liability Litigation. Over 650 lawsuits have been filed in the Pradaxa MDL (No. 2385, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois).
Pradaxa is an anticoagulant medication prescribed to people with heart problems. But, Pradaxa has no antidote and extensive bleeding or death has been the result in many instances.Pradaxa causes life-threatening internal bleeding.
Side effects of Pradaxa may include:
- Brain hemorrhage
- Digestive system bleeding
- Uncontolled internal bleeding
The Pradaxa lawsuits have been mounting up quickly. Many victims are seniors who fall and end up with a brain bleed internal bleeding or bleeding that does not stop and cannot be controlled by any other medication. Anyone who cares for or has a love do one who is on Pradaxa must observe them carefully.
Signs Of Externsive Bleeding
- a sudden severe headache
- seizures with no previous history of seizures
- weakness in an arm or leg
- nausea or vomiting
- decreased alertness; lethargy
- changes in vision
- tingling or numbness
- difficulty speaking or understanding speech
- difficulty swallowing
- difficulty writing or reading
- loss of fine motor skills, such as hand tremors
- loss of coordination
- loss of balance
- an abnormal sense of taste
- loss of consciousness
Extensive Bleeding From Pradaxa can be fatal. If you have lost a loved one due to extensive bleeding from Pradaxa call for a Pradaxa lawyer today.
GranuFlo and Naturlayte, the Dialyis medications causing immediate cardiac arrest have been consolidated into a Massachusetts MDL. The Fresenius Granuflo and NaturaLyte lawsuits filed in the federal court system will now be consolidated before one Massachusetts’ judge for pretrial proceedings, as part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL).
Class Action Lawyer Network GranuFlo lawyers are filing lawsuits for heart attacks or sudden deaths caused by the use of GranuFlo or NaturaLyte dialysis products during hemodialysis. Victims hearts suddenly stop during or shortly after dialysis treatment involving the use of Granuflo Acid Concentrate or NaturaLyte Liquid Acid Concentrate in dialysis treatment.
It appears Fresenius failed to adequately research the side effects of their dialysate products or warn about the potential risks including the importance of monitoring bicarbonate levels of patients receiving the products to avoid sudden cardiac arrest and death.
Dialysis medication lawyers are accepting immediate cases for injury and wrongful death.
Class Action Lawyer Network, lawyers for Metronic Infuse Bone Graft lawyers are accepting cases for off label use and severe injury.
The Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft is a medical device that helps stimulate bone growth after lower-spinal surgery. Unfortunately, the device has been linked to hundreds of adverse event reports due to off label use of the product.
The dangers linked to the Metronic Infuse Bone Graft when used off-label for spinal surgeries include:
- Nerve Damage
- Uncontrolled/Ectopic Bone Growth
- Airway Swelling and Compression
- Difficulty Breathing, Swallowing or Speaking
- Compression of the Airway
- Respiratory Depression
- Nerve Damage
If you or a loved one suffered one of these injuries after receiving a spinal fusion surgery with the Metronic Infuse Bone Graft contact us for a complete case review. Manufacturers who choose profits over people must be held responsible for the harm they cause.
Stryker is reaching out to victims of their Rejuvinate and ABG II Hip replacements thru Broadspire Services Inc. Beware and contact a Stryker Hip Replacement lawyer immediately. It is best to have a retained lawyer as these cases will be part of a nationwide MDL ( multi distrcit litigation ) hip replacement lawsuit just like the DePuy Pinnacle and many others. Stryker says "“Stryker will be reimbursing patients for testing, treatment, revision surgery; if necessary; and other costs relating to this voluntary recall.” But this is vague and unclear and by accepting this you may lose your oppoertunity for a settlement once these are negotiated by Stryker lawyers. Stryker is not on your side.
Stryker Broadspire Contacts For Medical Expenses
You may have recently received a Stryker letter from a doctor informing you that Broadspire Services, Inc. had been retained to handle claims for patient expenses related to the Stryker Rejuvenate recall. According to information on Stryker’s website, “Stryker will be reimbursing patients for testing, treatment, revision surgery, if necessary, and other costs relating to this voluntary recall.” Stryker has also directed doctors to inform their patients that Broadspire would be working directly with patients on their claims, and to contact Stryker for more information. You should keep in mind that any information you disclose during the Stryker Broadspire claims process, or to a Broadspire representative, could dramatically effect your Stryker hip recall lawsuit settlement. You should speak to a Stryker lawyer before you contact Broadspire, and especially before you agree to or sign anything. This is extremely important.
Many seniors do not understand the process and are easily coerced. They are vulnerable and concerned about medical care. You should speak to an experienced Stryker Hip Replacement lawyer.
Hip Implnat lawyers in Miami, Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Ft Myers, Melbourne, Jacksonville, Pensacola, Tampa, Sarasota, Bradnenton, Ocala, Vero Beach and all of Florida are investigating claims by floridians against Stryker and DePuy for complications and revisions.
The DePuy Asr and DePuy Pinncale have been recalled, as wel as the Stryker ABG II Modular Stems and Rejuvuante for complications. The DePuy is a matal on metal while the Stryker's are metal component but, they both are having the same complications.
- Metal toxicity and ions in the blood
- High levels of Chromium or Cobalt in the blood
- pain and discomfort
- Dislocation at the site location
It should also be noted that hip implants in women have a 29 percent higher failure rate than in men, Medpage Today reported. Researchers at the Permanente Research Group in San Diego published the study in the February 2013 issue of JAMA Internal Medicine.
For a metal on metal hip implant lawyer call today