Class Action Article

  • File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit: Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Talcum Powder Fallopian Tube Cancer Lawsuits Baby  Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Filed If you or a loved one used talcum powder products and were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, or fallopian tube can...

Class Action News

Drug Class Actions

  • Taxotere Lawyers for Permanent Hair Loss: Taxotere Baldness Lawyers For  Permanent Hair Loss Lawsuits Have you received Taxotere for breast cancer? Taxotere can result in hair loss or baldness  that is permanent. Taxotere  is a chemotherapy drug used for the treatment of breas...

Medical Device Lawsuits

  • Zimmer Hip Replacement Lawyers: Network Zimmer Hip Replacement  Lawyer Win $2 Million Against Zimmer Hip Replacement Do You Have A Faulty Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prothesis With Connective Technology and Cobalt Chromium Head? Do You Have Have Metallosis or Chromium Cobalt T...

Posts Tagged ‘keys’

Risperdal Lawyers | Enlarged Breasts in Boys Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Our Risperdal lawyers are accepting cases for unusual breast development in males. Risperdal  $70M Verdict In Philadelphia  Risperdal  Trial Johnson & Johnson was hit with a $70 million verdict on Friday when a  Philadelphia jury found that the antipsychotic drug Risperdal had caused an adolescent boy to grow female breasts. Risperdal and Enlarged Breasts In Young  Males Risperdal   has been linked to enlarged breasts in your males. This is  a condition called gynecomastia. he Growth of male breasts can cause severe emotional distress.  Surgery may be required to correct the condition.  Risperdal may increase levels of prolactin, a hormone which stimulates breast development in women. Young boys who have taken prolactin and are displaying increased levels of this hormone may develop male breasts or gynecomastia. Can I Join The Risperdal Gynecomastia Lawsuits? If you  are a male and have  enlarged female breast call no to see if you qualify to join others in a Risperdal lawsuit. Risperdal is the  brand name for the drug called Risperidone. This is approved to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. Risperdal  but has resulted in gynecomastia. Gynecomastia, the development of real female breasts.  It is real breast tissue growth caused by an increase in the hormone prolactin. If you have enlarged breasts with; Pain, Swelling, Tenderness and Nipple discharge and may need surgery  to remove excess breast tissue you may be able to join the Risperdal class action lawsuits. Get A Risperdal Lawyer Lawsuits are being filed against  Johnson & Johnson through its subsidiary Janssen Pharmaceuticals, for  failing to properly inform doctors and patients about the effects of Risperdal.  

Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News, Consumer products Injury Lawyer, File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit

Do You Want To File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit?

If you have used talcum powder  or  baby powder products and developed ovarian cancer you may be able to file a Talcum Powder  lawsuit  Current lawsuits Johnson & Johnson claim that long-term use of talc-based products caused women to develop ovarian cancer. Victims claim   that they were not  warned of the risks associated with these talc products. Women and their families may be able to seek compensation for  ovarian cancer diagnosis  with the help of one of our lawyers.  

Is There A Risk of Talcum Powder Causing Ovarian Cancer?

Talcum powder lawsuits claim Talcum Powder  caused ovarian cancer. When used as a feminine hygiene product, talc particles can travel through the vagina and  into the ovaries and remain trapped for years. These  talc particles can cause inflammation and  eventually  lead to the growth of ovarian cancer cells.

Studies Claim Dangers Of Talcum Powder

Although Johnson & Johnson maintains that talcum powder is safe for use, plaintiffs in ovarian cancer lawsuits offer   studies that  suggest an association between talc and ovarian cancer dating as far back  as 1971. In 1994, Johnson & Johnson was put on notice of a  link between talc and ovarian cancer. A letter was sent from the Cancer Prevention Coalition to the then-CEO of the company.

Will  There Be  a Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Class Action Lawsuit I Can Join ?

According to news reports, more than 1,200 women claim talcum powder caused their  ovarian cancer. Currently the lawsuits are being filed at the state level.

Talcum Powder Lawsuit Settlements

A $72 million talcum powder verdict is handed down against Johnson & Johnson in favor of a woman who claimed that long-term Shower-to-Shower use for feminine hygiene caused her to develop ovarian cancer. The verdict included a $62 million award of punitive damages against the company. Our  talcum powder cancer lawyers  are available to discuss your options.    

Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class Action Articles, Talcum Powder cancer lawyers

Lawyers Filing Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits For Baby Powder

Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Do You Want To File A Baby Powder Cancer Lawsuit?

Studies show that talcum-based powder can  cause ovarian cancer in women who have used it for genital/perineal hygiene. Studies dating back to 1982 have consistently linked prolonged talc-based baby and body powder usage with ovarian cancer.  The talc particles moves  through the female reproductive system and settles in the ovaries. These particles may remain in the ovaries for many years, creating inflammation resulting in the development and proliferation of cancer cells. Studies HAVE Linked  Ovarian Cancer to Talc-Based Baby/Body Powder The pathology reports and tissue samples that were used to diagnose the ovarian cancer can now be examined to determine whether your ovarian tissues contain talc particles.  Talc particles can be found in the pelvic lymph nodes, ovaries, and fallopian tubes and take many years to disintegrate and exit the body. The talcum powder cancer lawyers at Class Action Lawyer Network are speaking to women about  talc having  caused your ovarian cancer.

Speak To A Talcum Powder Lawyer

If you have been  diagnosed with ovarian cancer after long term  use of talcum-based products, such as Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder, Shower to Shower, and others  we want to talk to you regarding  filing a talcum powder cancer lawsuit.

Was There Sufficient Warning For Boston Transvaginal Mesh Victims?

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Medical Device Lawsuits, Transvaginal mesh

Did The Manufacturers Of The Transvaginal Mesh And Bladder Sling Give Sufficient Warning?

Boston Vaginal Mesh Lawyers say no in the thousands of transvaginal mesh and bladder sling claims that have been filed in the Pelvic Mesh Repair Lawsuits MDL'Ls.

According to transvaginal mesh lawyers accross the country who are filing vaginal mesh and bladder sling lawsuits the warning was insufficient. For a warning to be sufficient, a transvaginal mesh warning  should appropriately signal danger while simultaneously providing the information in order to use the product appropriately.  A  pharmaceutical or medical device  manufacturer doesn’t necessarily have to discuss matters that are basic medical knowledge.  They are not in a position to control the individual practices  of doctors in every single medical community. 

 Will The Device  Warnings The Transvaginal meshmanufacturers provided  to the doctor relieve them of their duty to warn the patient.

What are some ways that warnings can become inadequate?  Some variables that courts will consider include:  If they are overly broad or too generic, contradictory statements made in the inserts, actions by the sales representatives, and presenting the warning in a way that makes it unlikely to be read.  Remember, every case is different.  In some cases, a doctor might not even bother to read the warnings.  In other cases, the possibility of an adverse reaction is too small to even impact the doctor’s decision.  There have even been cases where a doctor has stated that even if he were given new information, he would have still followed through with his initial decision.

What other possible legal theories being explored?  If a company supplies product related information to the public that amounts to an express warranty, they can be held liable for breach of warranty if the plaintiff can successfully prove that the information was false.

We will be watching the pelvic mesh repair proceedings and waiting to see how they play out.

To file a Transvagina, mesh lawsuit for a Prolene mesh surgicall implanted in: D.C., Daytona, Fort Myers, Ft Lauderdale,  Gainesville,  Jacksonville,  Keys,  Lakeland, Miami, Ocala, Orlando, Panama City, Pensacola, Sarasota, St. Augustine,  Boston, Springfield,  Worcester, Ann Arbor, Detroit,  Grand Rapids, Jackson, Lansing, Minneapolis,  St Paul, Charlotte. Fayetteville,  Greensboro,  Raleigh, Wilmington, Winston Salem, Fargo, Providence,  Charleston, Columbia,  Florence, Greenville, Seattle, Tacoma, Charleston,  Wisconsin, Milwaukee,  Cheyenne,  Casper,  Laramie,  Gillette, Milwaukee, Montana, Billings, Springfield, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Omaha ,Manchester, Albuquerque, Charlotte, Raleigh, Greensboro, Winston-Salem, Durham,  Fayetteville,  Wilmington, Providence, Charleston  Seattle, Milwaukee, Madison,  Green Bay, Casper or Laramie call Class Action Lawyer Network transvaginal mesh attorneys today.

Gynemesh Transvaginal Mesh Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Gynemesh Class Action Lawyers are filing lawsuits against the manufacturers of the Gynemesh transvsagina mesh Implant in 3, 4, 5 and 6 year product liability statute states.

Our Gynemesh Class Action  Lawyers Are Accepting Transvaginal mesh Lawsuits

For Gynemesh Vaginal Mesh Surgically Implanted In The Following 3, 4, 5 and 6 year product liability statute states.

 D.C, Florida, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska,  New Hampshire, New Mexico,  North Carolina,  Rhode Island, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

   Ethicon Gynecare Prolift Pelvic Mesh Lawsuits For Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh

    Ethicon Gynecare Prosima Pelvic Mesh
    Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh
    Ethicon Prolene Mesh
    Ethicon Gynecare TVT Sling

An Ethicon Gynemesh  vaginal mesh or bladder sling lawsuits are being filed  for women who have experienced complications.

Gynemesh Complications Include

  •     Infection
  •     Erosion of the Mesh
  •     Urinary Problems
  •     Digestive problems
  •     Pelvic Pain
  •     Re Prolapse
  •     Injury to Nearby Organs
  •     Difficulty during intimacy

The FDA has received reports of problems with Ethicon Gynemesh vaginal mesh implants

Overview Of  Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh

Gynecare Gynemesh was first introduced in October 2002. Gynemesh is also called the Gynecare GynemeshPS, nonabsorbable Prolene Soft Mesh, for vaginal wall prolapse surgical treatment.

What Is Ethicon Gynemesh?

Ethicon Gynemesh is porous, which allows surrounding tissues to grow into and incorporate the material as part of the body, which can create severe complications. If you are a victim of a faulty Gynemesh Vaginal Mesh

Speak To A Gynemesh Lawsuit Attorney Today

DePuy Recalls Custom Joint Implants, DePuy Recall Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class MDL Class Action News, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Medical Device Lawsuits, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Product Recall News, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Class action lawyers announce another DePuy recall: DePuy Hip replacement and custom joint implants

DePuy has been forced to recall another product. FDA Forces DePuy Recall of Custom Joint Implants
September 5, 2012 by: Linda Grayling

DePuy Orthopaedics is being forced to recall yet another line of hip and other artificial joint implants. This time, the Johnson & Johnson subsidiary is pulling back its custom orthopedic devices because of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety concerns. The recall notice was issued on August 24 — two years after its ASR hip-implant recall.

DePuy agreed in January 2012 to stop manufacturing the custom devices after a warning letter from the FDA. In it, the agency said the implants were being sold without federal approval, which requires an application with the FDA and clinical trials. DePuy argued that the devices were exempt because they were already approved by the FDA and modified only by doctors’ prescriptions, which is permitted by law.

But the FDA disagreed: “Although the devices’ size and shape may vary with each patient’s anatomy, the standardized design characteristics do not vary among the devices manufactured. The fact that final specifications are tailored to match a patient’s anatomy does not preclude a clinical study or submission of a marketing application for the devices.”

The FDA also said DePuy used poor quality-control systems in the production of the 14 types of custom implants. It ordered the company to recall any implants that had been delivered to surgeons prior to the halt in manufacturing earlier this year. More than 8,300 customized DePuy implants have been sold since 1999, but the number of unused devices in the recall is unknown.

DePuy already is dealing with a massive global recall of 93,000 ASR hip-replacement and hip-resurfacing devices that was announced in August 2010. The defective metal-on-metal hip implants have been shown to fail within a few years, resulting in painful revision surgeries. Typically, all-metal hip implants are expected to last about 15 years.

In addition, the DePuy artificial hips produce metal shavings when the ball and socket components grind against each other, causing metallosis, or metal poisoning of the blood. One British study found that when the metal debris becomes embedded in surrounding tissues, it increases the patient’s risk of bladder and kidney cancers.

In the United States, more than 8,000 patients have filed lawsuits against DePuy over their dangerous hip implants. Of those, 6,000 federal cases are part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL) that is being overseen by Judge David A. Katz in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The first case in the MDL is expected to go to trial in March or April 2013.

The remaining state cases are winding their way through the courts. The first three DePuy ASR lawsuits, which were scheduled to be tried together in Las Vegas, Nevada, were settled out of court recently. Bloomberg reported the plaintiffs each received about $200,000.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits, You Must file Before the Statute Is Up

Written by Class Action Lawyer on . Posted in Medical Device Lawsuits

Time to File Depends on the Date of Injury

Statutes of limitations are state laws that require plaintiffs to file their cases within set time periods. Because all defective medical device lawsuits are tort claims, they are covered by state law and not federal law. Any medical device lawsuits before U.S. District Courts are claims brought under state law by plaintiffs from states other than the ones in which the manufacturers are located. The purpose of statutes of limitations is to encourage injured parties to bring their claims in a timely manner to prevent courts from dealing with old records and hazy memories.
vaginal mesh mdl lawsuits image
The amount of time a statute of limitations gives someone to file a claim depends on the type of claim the plaintiff is filing. Commonly, the limitations period for products liability cases is two or three years from the date of injury. When the injury occurred matters significantly from a legal standpoint. Sometimes, the injury “occurs” the day the vaginal mesh was implanted; other times it “occurs” when the plaintiff first knew or could have reasonably found out about the injury. This can be troubling for vaginal mesh recipients because the pain and symptoms of mesh erosion might not occur until long after the initial procedure. Because some women might have already had their vaginal mesh problems resolved years ago and didn’t meet with a Vaginal mesh lawyer, the statute of limitations might have already expired for them, and they will be unable to obtain compensation via a transvaginal mesh lawsuit. If you are having complications ffrom a vaginal mesh it is in your best interests not to wait and file with a lawyer immediately. You must not run the risk of losing your rights to file a lawsuit. The vaginal mesh complications are sever and the mesh implants are ruining lives. You Must send a message and contact a lawyer today. 1 877 522-2123

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit News Update , Vaginal Mesh Lawyer

Written by Class Action Lawyer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

More than 150 federal lawsuits involving vaginal mesh slings were consolidated in a U.S. District Court in West Virginia. "actions in each MDL share factual issues arising from allegations of defects in pelvic surgical mesh products manufactured by AMS, Boston Scientific, and Ethicon." The cases will be heard in front of one judge who understands the issues.

Ask Questions   Get Answers

Also known as a pelvic sling, bladder mesh, or transvaginal mesh, the vaginal mesh support systems are used to help with pelvic organ prolapse  as well as urinary incontinence  It is now known that they can cause serious internal injuries.  These vaginal mesh patch implants, manufactured by Johnson & Johnson , C.R. Bard, Boston Scientific, American Medical Systems, and others, may cause pain, infection, erosion, organ damage, and additional surgeries, and other vaginal mesh injuries.

If you have experienced vaginal mesh complications following pelvic organ prolapse surgery or stress urinary incontinence surgery, The  vaginal mesh Helpline  will offer support and direct you to a lawyer who   may be able to help you obtain significant compensation for the vaginal mesh problems you are experiencing.

Call us at 1 877 -522-2123 to speak with a female social worker and be directed to a lawyer.

Vaginal Mesh- History of the Problem

Between the years of 2005 and 2010, nearly 4,000 vaginal mesh injuries have been reported to the Food and Drug Administration.  In a 2010 article in the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology, researchers stated that they had to cease a vaginal mesh clinical trial early because of the higher-than-expected number of complications and injuries.  The trial was stopped when it was discovered that more than 15 percent of women who were implanted with vaginal mesh suffered vaginal mesh erosion within only three months of implantation.  As a result of numerous negative reports, the FDA issued a vaginal mesh warning to patients and physicians in 2011, cautioning that the risks of using vaginal mesh are so severe that alternative treatments should be considered.  It is now widely accepted that, in most cases, pelvic organ prolapsed can be treated without the use of vaginal mesh

What are the vaginal Mesh Injuries

    Erosion of vaginal tissue
    Hardening of the vaginal mesh
    Infection
    Pain and discomfort
    Perforations of the bowel, bladder or blood vessels
    Recurrence of Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) and Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
    Urinary problems
    Vaginal mesh erosion
    Vaginal scarring

Many women who have suffered injuries as a result of vaginal mesh have decided to file defective medical device lawsuits. This has become a class  and  class action lawsuits are being filed. An product liability, class action attorney can review your case.

 

1401 Broadway, New York, NY 10018

20 N.Orange Ave, Orlando, FL 32801
Attorneys who cover Orlando, Winter Park, Winterhaven, Kissimmee,Ocala,Atlamonte Springs,Deland,Melbourne, Daytona. Orange,Osceola,Seminole,Lake,Volusia, Polk and Brevard Counties

5713 Corporate Way, West Palm Beach, FL
Attorneys who cover: Lake Worth, West Palm Beach, Jupiter, Stuart,Port St Lucie, Okeechobee, Belle Glade, Vero Beach, Palm Bay Palm Beach, Martin, St Lucie and Indian River counties

200 Biscayne Blvd., Miami, FL 33131
Attorneys who cover Miami, Hialeah, Miami Beach and the Florida Keys including all of Dade and Monroe counties

110 E. Broward Blvd., Ft. Lauderdale , FL 33301
Attorneys who cover Hollywood,Fort Lauderdale,Pompano, Deerfield Beach, Coral Springs and all of Broward County

3630 W. Kennedy Blvd., Tampa, FL 33360
Attorneys who cover Tampa, Brandon, Clearwater, St Pete, New Port Richey, Brooksville, Sarasota, Naple, Venice, Bradenton, Fort Myers, Cape Coral and all of Hernanado, Citrus, Pasco, Pinnellas, Hillsboro, Sarasota, Manatee, Lee and Collier counties.

10151 Deerwood Park # 200-250, Jacksonville, FL
Attorneys who cover  Jacksonville, Jacksonville Beach, St. Augustine, Orange Park all of Northeast Florida including Marion Sumter, Flager and Duval counties. Also Attorneys who cover Northwest Florida including: Tallahassee, Pensacola, Panama City and Starke.

233 Peachtree Street N.E., Atlanta, GA 30303
Attorneys who cover Atlanta, Decatur, Roswell, Marietta, Jonesboro, Gainesville, New Smyrna, Fayetteville, Buford, Cartersville, Lilburn, Macon, Augusta, Savanah, and all of Georgia.

1001 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20001

4201 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90010

Attorney Network class action lawyers of New York, New Jersey, Colorado, Arizona,California, North and South Carolina, Tennessee  Michigan, and Texas

If you have suffered any of the above listed injuries after being implanted with vaginal mesh to remedy a pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence  you may be entitled to  compensation in a dangerous medical device class action litigation.  An experienced medical product liability Attorney will  analyze  your claim and explain your legal rights. Speak to A  female MSW about your  vaginal mesh .
 

Lawyers for Reglan, FDA Warnings for Reglan, Tardive Dyskinesia

Written by Class Action Lawyer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News, Drug Warnings

What is Reglan (Metoclopramide)? A. H. Robins Co. Reglan Metoclopramide
Reglan (metoclopramide) is a prescription drug often prescribed to treat gastrointestinal problems in children and adults. Reglan is most often used to control gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), or to reduce nausea and vomiting.  Physicians will often use Reglan for both children and adults suffering from reflux, gastroparesis, and other conditions related to the stomach such as heartburn, decreased appetite, and prolonged fullness after eating.  Even infants are sometimes given Reglan for reflux.
Reglan works by affecting the lower esophageal sphincter pressure, which then helps to improve gastrointestinal emptying.  The FDA has only approved Reglan for short-term treatment (between 4 and 12 weeks) of these conditions, and  only after conservative methods of treatment have failed.  Unfortunately, prescription trends prove that many patients are prescribed Reglan for longer than 12 weeks (often for years), which is against FDA recommendations.  The manufacturers of Reglan are well aware of these extended prescription trends.
Medical science and studies have proven that Reglan can cause Tardive Dyskinesia, a serious and often irreversible movement disorder.  Infants who are given Reglan appear to be at an even greater risk for this serious drug side effect.

FDA Issues Advisory for Reglan
In February 2009, the FDA issued an advisory, that forces the manufacturers of Reglan (MCP) to update their label. The advisory calls for a "black box" warning – the strongest warning that the FDA can issue. The advisory (and the proposed black box warning) are attached here … In addition, the FDA has requested that the drug companies send Dear Doctor letters – enclosing the new label and the new warning. This also is one of the strongest ways the FDA can spread the word – both to doctors and to patients taking Reglan.

What is GERD or Reflux?
For infants, it is often called reflux, short for the medical term gastroesophageal reflux (GER).  It is a common condition in infants, and typically resolves between six and twelve months of age.  Infants with reflux will often spit up after feeding, and have difficulties taking in enough nutrition.  Many babies suffer from reflux, and rarely need treatment.  Some, however, do receive Reglan for treatment.
For adults, the symptoms usually progress to a greater set of problems, such as chronic heartburn, decreased appetite, or the more difficult issues of constant nausea and vomiting.  Treatment with Reglan is intended to last for 4 to 12 weeks.  Many doctors are unaware of this recommendation, and end up prescribing Reglan for significantly longer periods.  This can have terrible consequences for the patient.
As with any medication, a detailed risk/benefit discussion with your doctor is critical.  Your prescribing medical professional must adequately explain the increased risk of tardive dyskinesia posed by use of Reglan, particularly with extended use.  Since Reglan is only intended to be used for short-term relief of gastrointestinal problems when other treatments have failed, the risks associated with long term use are very serious.  Failure to properly monitor the duration of use, or the over prescribing of the medicine, may be negligent on the part of the physician.

What is Tardive Dyskinesia (TD)?
Tardive dyskinesia is a neurological syndrome that can be caused by the long-term use of neuroleptic drugs, including Reglan.  Different classes of neuroleptic drugs are prescribed for psychiatric disorders, but Reglan also has neuroleptic characteristics.
Tardive dyskinesia is most often characterized by repetitive, involuntary, purposeless movements.  Patients suffering from TD may exhibit involuntary facial gestures, such as grimacing, tongue protrusion, lip smacking, puckering and pursing, and rapid eye blinking. They may also suffer rapid and involuntary movements of the fingers, hands, arms, shoulders, legs, and trunk.   TD can even adversely affect the ability to breathe, swallow, walk, and talk.  
Tardive dyskinesia is a serious and potentially irreversible disorder.  It can be caused by Reglan and metoclopramide.

What is the connection between Reglan and Tardive Dyskinesia (TD)?
The FDA and the pharmaceutical manufacturers have long recognized that Reglan increases the risk of tardive dyskinesia.  The physicians and the patients using the drug are rarely made aware of the true nature of the risk, and the label for the drug does a poor job of explaining the dangers.  Many physicians are unaware that the drug is intended for short term use only, and continue to prescribe Reglan month after month.
Scientific and medical studies have suggested that as many as 1 in 4 patients who take Reglan for more than a year may develop symptoms of TD.  The conditions can occur in much shorter time periods as well.  Both the amount and the duration of the prescription appear to increase the risk of developing TD.
Likewise, studies have shown that the risk of developing TD is greater for children (especially infants) than for adults taking Reglan.  While TD can afflict anyone taking Reglan, children are apparently much more susceptible to the effects of Reglan.
Often the diagnosis of TD is a difficult one to make.  Reglan actually conceals the very symptoms it is causing, which makes it a difficult diagnosis to make.  For this reason, symptoms of TD will often surface only after the drug is discontinued.  As a result, the true extent of the injury is often greater than anticipated, because Reglan is continuing to cause a greater injury, while hiding the symptoms.

How is Tardive Dyskinesia treated?
Unfortunately, there is no known treatment for tardive dyskinesia.  In some cases, the syndrome may resolve or the symptoms may be reduced weeks or even months after a patient stops taking Reglan.   For some patients, however,  the damage is irreversible.

What can you do?
Contact Class Action Lawyer Network for a Reglan Tardive Dyskenesia form Reglanlawyer

Coopvision Avaira Toric Contact Lense Lawyers, Lawsuits on the rise

Written by Class Action Lawyer on . Posted in Product Recall News

Class Action lawyer Network announces a new helpline for Avaira Toric Contact Lense Complications. CooperVision is  recalling  the Avaira Toric brand contact lenses because they were manufactured and distributed with unintended silicone residue. This harmful adulteration has led to serious  eye complications including eye pain, blurring, haziness of vision, and even total vision loss. There are increasing reports of serious eye injuries including corneal ulcers, corneal lesions, corneal abrasions, corneal edema, corneal erosion, and keratitis. Other complaints include blurry or hazy vision often described as a white or opaque film over the eye, severe eye pain, burning, redness, dryness, light sensitivity, and vision impairment. While some users may suffer only temporary side effects, others may require urgent medical care or experience permanent vision loss.The CooperVision Avaira Toric contact lens recall has been classified by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) as a Class I Recall, which means that using the product can potentially lead to severe side effects and complications. There can be sever damage to the eyes. If you or a loved one is useing the Coopervision Avaira Contact lenses and showing side effects see you eye doctor immediately and call Class Action Lawyer network for an immediate case review.

Anyone who used Avaira Toric contact lenses or Avaira Sphere contact lenses who has suffered adverse side effects or whose contact lenses are affected by the Avaira contact lens recall should contact a medical device or contact lens Class Action Lawyer Network attorney who will evaluate your case. It is also very important to keep the contact lenses and all original packaging because this is evidence that will be important in a lawsuit.

Call Class Action lawyer Network for a free CooperVision Avaira Toric Contact Lens Recall Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one has been injured by CooperVision Avaira Toric contact lense recall contact  the Class Action lawyer Network. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a lawsuit against CooperVision.

 

 

Anyone who used Avaira Toric contact lenses or Avaira Sphere contact lenses who has suffered adverse side effects or whose contact lenses are affected by the Avaira contact lens recall should contact a medical device or contact lens Class Action Lawyer Network attorney who will evaluate your case. It is also very important to keep the contact lenses and all original packaging because this is evidence that will be important in a lawsuit.

Call Class Action lawyer Network for a free CooperVision Avaira Toric Contact Lens Recall Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one has been injured by CooperVision Avaira Toric contact lense recall contact  the Class Action lawyer Network. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a lawsuit against CooperVision.