Class Action Article

  • Physiomesh Hernia Mesh Lawyers: Physiomesh Hernia Mesh lawyers are filing Hernia Mesh lawsuits for your failed Physiomesh used to repair your hernia. Ethicon voluntarily withdrew the Physiomesh from the  market in May of 2016  after independent studies revealed high rates...

Class Action News

  • Stryker Femoral Heads Hip Replacement Lawyers: Stryker V40 Taper Hip Replacement Lawyers Stryker Hip Replacement Lawyers Hip Implant lawyers are filing hip replacement lawsuits for V40 Femoral head failure in the Stryker Hip Implant. In August 2016, Stryker contacted implanting physic...

Drug Class Actions

  • Taxotere Lawyers for Permanent Hair Loss: Taxotere Baldness Lawyers For  Permanent Hair Loss Lawsuits Have you received Taxotere for breast cancer? Taxotere can result in hair loss or baldness  that is permanent. Taxotere  is a chemotherapy drug used for the treatment of breas...

Medical Device Lawsuits

  • File An IVC Filter Lawsuit: Our IVC Filter lawyers are filing IVC Filter lawsuits for injury and Death from a fractured migrating IVC Filter part. The IVC Filters, also known as blood clot filters, Blood Clot Capture Filters and Inferior Vena Cava Filters, are implant...

Posts Tagged ‘NYC’

Stryker Femoral Heads Hip Replacement Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News, Stryker femoral head hip Implant lawyer

Stryker V40 Taper Hip Replacement Lawyers Stryker Hip Replacement Lawyers

Hip Implant lawyers are filing hip replacement lawsuits for V40 Femoral head failure in the Stryker Hip Implant. In August 2016, Stryker contacted implanting physicians about metal wear associated with its V40 Taper when used with some cobalt chromium heads.Stryker Orthopaedics sent an Urgent Medical Device Recall Notification to orthopedic surgeons. The recall involves certain sizes of LIFT™ Anatomic CoCr V40™ Femoral Heads manufactured prior to 2011. If you had a LIFT- V40 Femoral Head implanted during total hip replacement, you should be watching for a letter from your surgeon in the next few weeks. You may also be getting a letter from Stryker or a company hired by Stryker to handle claims.

 Stryker Recall Metal V 40 Femoral Heads Lawsuits

Stryker has voluntarily recalled some of their metal V40 femoral heads used with hip implants. Stryker hip replacement lawyers are interested in speaking to anyone with a failed: Exeter, Citation, Meridian, Reliance, Definition, Restoration, Accolade Rejuvenate ABG 2 stems.

This failure may be due to the problems with the V40 femoral head.

The failure of these heads is caused by corrosion and metal debris at the junction between the metal head and neck. The clinical results for patients include pain, loss of mobility, ambulation problems and an inability to work. Poisoning of the soft tissue, muscle and bone are the cause. Revision surgeries may be needed due to premature failures. Stryker lawyers  are seeking patients with  LFit V40 femoral heads made before 2011.

What Is The Femoral Head  Problem?

This is a ball for total hip replacements that can be attached to hip stems, including the Accolade TMZF, Accolade 2, Meridian, and Citation. There have been numerous incidents  of taper lock failures on LFit V40 femoral heads made before 2011,  This taper lock connects the “ball” part of the hip joint to the  hip stem that is inserted in the femur. When it breaks the femoral head will detach from the femoral neck.

Get A Stryker Hip Implant Lawyer

Our Stryker Hip Replacement lawyers are currently accepting Stryker LFit V40 failure cases.

Viagra Melanoma Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Viagra- melanoma lawyers

Viagra- Melanoma Alert

Viagra may be linked to  skin cancer. New Studies  links Viagra to dangerous  melanoma According to a  recent study published in The Journal of the American Medical Association, men who had used Viagra were  found to show  an increased risk of developing melanoma. If you think Viagra use might have caused your  skin cancer contact the Viagra- Melanoma lawyers at Class Action Lawyer Network What is Melanoma?   Melanoma is a  serious  skin cancer which can be fatal.  Are you taking Viagra and have noticed A change to an existing mole or other skin growths A small, dark, multicolored spot with irregular borders that may bleed and scab A cluster of shiny, firm, dark bumps A mole larger than a pencil eraser See a dermatologist immediately. If you have a diagnosis of melanoma contact our melanoma – skin cancr lawyers

IVC Bard Blood Clot Filers Lawyer Alert

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Bard IVC Filter Lawyers

IVC Filter Lawyers Advise – Bard IVC Filter Lawsuits Consolidated

Bard IVC Filter lawsuits have been transferred to a  federal court in Arizona. IVC Filter lawyers of Class Action Lawyer Network will  help victims injured by the  defective IVC filters.

IVC Filter MDL

A transfer order filed Monday, in  the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), resulted in  all present and future federal product liability lawsuits against inferior vena cava filter (IVC filter) manufacturers, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. (BPV),  to be centralized in a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the District of Arizona.

What Are IVC Filters?

IVC filters are surgical implants that catch blood clots before they travel to the lungs  to avoid causing a pulmonary embolism. The Bard IVC Filter devices are  fracturing, tilting, migrating, or puncturing the vena cava.

FDA Vena Cava Filter Warnings

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a safety warning in 2010, citing that  more than 900 IVC Filter adverse event reports  were filed  over  five years A study published in the April 2013 edition of Jama Internal Medicine, found that less than 10% of retrievable IVC filters surveyed were successfully removed. They also reported that   8% of persons surveyed still suffered venous thrombotic events while the IVC filter was in place. In 2014, the FDA issued an updated warning  to doctors recommending that IVC filters be removed within one to two months once the need for the filter has passed.  They noted that doctors may not have previously been made aware of the urgency surrounding retrieval of the device.

IVC Filter Lawyers

IVC filter lawyers will help you get  compensation as part of the Bard IVC filter MDL, which has been consolidated to the U.S. District Court of Arizona.  

Benicar Gastrointestinal Injury Attorneys

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Benicar Villous Atrophy Attorneys, Drug Lawsuits, Drug Warnings, Drugs and Devices lawsuit attorneys

Benicar Gastrointestinal Injury  Lawyers

Filing Benicar Intestinal Injury Lawsuits

What Is Benicar?

Benicar is a  high blood pressure medication.   Benicor has been  linked to severe intestinal injury, intestinal damage, chronic diarrhea, malnourishment and severe weight loss. Seniors are the largest population receiving prescriptions for Benicar and are the most vulnerable to sever injury from Benicar.

FDA Benicar Warnings

The FDA   has warned patients and doctors that Benicar (olmesartan medoxomil) may cause a severe gastrointestinal (GI) problem called Villous Atrophy. Benicar causes the intestines to lose the texture and makes it difficult to absorb nutrients. This leads to malnutrition which and other digestive problems. This is very dangerous for seniors and can lead to death or hospitalization because of dehydration, chronic diarrhea and malnutrition. Villous Atrophy can result in limiting  the ability of the small intestines to absorb nutrients from food. At the most serious stages,  villous atrophy  causes  damage to the intestinal crypts, which is the intestinal lining that surround the villi.

Benicar Villous Atrophy Lawyers Filing Benicar Lawsuits

Benicar has been used by millions of people. Benicar warnings did not adequately disclose  how serious the side effects form this medication is. The Benicar lawyers at Class Action Lawyer Network are  filing claims for individuals who have experienced chronic diarrhea, sprue-like enteropathy or villous atrophy after using Benicar.  

Xarelto Hemorrhage Lawyers Filing Xarelto Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class Action Articles, Class MDL Class Action News, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Tennessee Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Xarelto Lawyers

Hemorrhages  Caused by Xarelto

Xarelto Lawyers Filing Extensive Bleeding Lawsuits

Our Xarelto lawyers are accepting Xarelto lawsuits for hemorrhage caused by Xarelto. Nationwide Xarelto attorneys are reviewing cases of excessive bleeding from Xarelto. In a recent Xareleto lawsuit a widow from Missouri has filed an Xarelto claim  against Johnson & Johnson, Janssen Research & Development, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, et al. to demand that the defendants be held liable for the death of her husband. Dixie A. Smith, surviving spouse of Jay Christopher Smith, filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, where it joins similar lawsuits pending in multidistrict litigation (MDL) No. 2592 before Judge Fallon. The plaintiff contends that had her late husband never taken the defendants’ medication, Xarelto, he would not have suffered a deadly intracerebral hemorrhage. Ms. Smith is suing for compensatory damages for past, present, and future economic expenditures incurred as a result of the decedent’s use of Xarelto, including medical and funeral expenses, loss of earnings, loss of companionship and support, and loss of the prospective net accumulations of an estate. Xarelto Caused A Brain  Hemorrhage The decedent’s physician prescribed Xarelto (rivaroxaban) during December of 2012. He continued to take the medication as prescribed until May of 2013. On May 4, the decedent was admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), at which point the hospital staff discontinued his use of Xarelto. He was transferred to the care of a specialty hospital unit on May 18 and on May 22 he died of the intracerebral hemorrhage. According to Ms. Smith’s Xarelto lawsuit, her late husband’s passing was a direct result of his use of rivaroxaban, which he reportedly never would have taken had he been fully informed of the risks. Xarelto is an anticoagulant or blood thinner that is prescribed for the treatment and prevention of blood clots. The medication is intended to reduce the risk of life-threatening complications caused by blood clots, including pulmonary embolism and stroke. Xarelto Lawsuits The product liability lawsuit regarding Xarelto draws attention to several reviews and clinical studies of the drug, including a 2012 report issued by The Institute for Safe Medication Practices. This report stated that there had been “356 reports of serious, disabling, or fatal injury in which rivaroxaban was the primary suspect drug. The report more than doubled from the previous quarter total of 128 cases.” The organization brought these statistics to the attention of the defendants, who reportedly advised The Institute for Safe Medication Practices that the data did not reflect any safety issues that required action. Ms. Smith’s Xarelto lawsuit alleges that the defendants prioritized profit over patient safety. Her complaint further claims that the defendants concealed their knowledge of the severe and life-threatening complications of Xarelto from consumers and the medical community. The lawsuit notes that the pharmaceutical giants failed to highlight the risks of uncontrollable bleeding events, nor did they provide medical protocols for stabilizing patients suffering from these bleeding events. Xarelto had been marketed as a replacement for an older blood thinner, warfarin (Coumadin). Warfarin has been used for years for patients who may be at a higher risk of blood clots. However, patients taking warfarin required regular medical monitoring and dietary restrictions, which Xarelto had promised to eliminate. Our Xarelto lawyers have been reviewing claims for excessive bleeding like these. Xarelto lawsuits are now consolidated in an MDL because many people have suffered injuries of a same type from Xarelto. Speak to an Xarelto lawyer today.

Pradaxa Lawsuits Update, Pradaxa Lawyers Filing Pradaxa Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Pradaxa Lawsuit  News and Updates

The Pradaxa lawsuits are moving forward. The Pradaxa lawyers advise all victims and families of  extensive bleeding from Pradaxa to file their Pradaxa lawsuit by callingour Pradaxa hotline rigjht away. The Pradaxa lawsuits are being filed in MDL 2385 – Pradaxa (Dabigatran Etexilate) Products Liability Litigation. Over  650 lawsuits have been filed in the  Pradaxa MDL (No. 2385, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois).

Pradaxa is an anticoagulant medication prescribed to people with  heart problems. But, Pradaxa has no antidote and extensive bleeding or death has been the result in many instances.Pradaxa causes life-threatening internal bleeding.

Side effects of Pradaxa may include:

  •     Brain hemorrhage
  •     Digestive system bleeding
  •     Uncontolled internal bleeding

The Pradaxa lawsuits have been mounting up  quickly. Many victims are seniors who fall and end up with a brain bleed internal bleeding or bleeding that does not stop and cannot be controlled by any other medication. Anyone who cares for or has a love do one who is on Pradaxa must observe them carefully.

Signs Of Externsive Bleeding

  •     a sudden severe headache
  •     seizures with no previous history of seizures
  •     weakness in an arm or leg
  •     nausea or vomiting
  •     decreased alertness; lethargy
  •     changes in vision
  •     tingling or numbness
  •     difficulty speaking or understanding speech
  •     difficulty swallowing
  •     difficulty writing or reading
  •     loss of fine motor skills, such as hand tremors
  •     loss of coordination
  •     loss of balance
  •     an abnormal sense of taste
  •     loss of consciousness

Extensive Bleeding From Pradaxa can be fatal. If you have lost a loved one due to extensive bleeding from Pradaxa call for a Pradaxa lawyer today.

Resperdal Class Action Lawyers, Resperdal Lawsuit Helpline

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Drug Lawsuits, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Resperdal lawsuits

Risperdal Lawyers Filing Gynecomastia Lawsuits

If you or a loved one was prescribed Risperdal as a teenage boy and now have enlarged breasts, developed female type breasts and /or been diagnosed with Gynecomastia,  contact Class Action Lawyer Network  Risperdal Injury Lawyers today to discuss your options in a Risperdal lawsuit.

Our Resperdal lawyers are reviewing cases for young  boys diagnosed with gynecomastia or male breasts after using Risperdal. Problems may result in:

  •     Breast Growth Among Boys
  •     Puffy Nipples or Enlarged Nipples
  •     Galactorrhea (production of milk from breasts)
  •     Painful Breasts or Nipple Discharge
  •     Mastectomy or Gynecomastia Surgery to Remove Male Breasts
  •     Gynecomastia (growth of male breasts, which may be painful or tender)

If your son has been diagnosed with Gynacomastia call our Resperdal helpline and speak to our trained medical social worker today.

Rispedral Side Effects In Male Children

Risperdal (risperidone) is an antipsychotic manufactured by Johnson & Johnson. It  was originally approved by the FDA for use for adults with schizophrenia.  Risperdal has also been widely used by children for bi-polar disorders, autism, irritability, aggression and behavior disorders.

Speak To A Risperdal Lawyer

The Riserdal  lawyers are reviewing cases for Risperdal breast growth among boys.

Children Are Being Injured By Risperdal

Lawsuits are being filed  for  abnormal development of large mammary glands among boys and adolescents, resulting in breast development.  Surgery has been  necessary to remove the breasts caused by the Risperdal gynecomastia.  This has caused emotional trauma for boys and young adult males and some incidents of suicide. Parents throughout the United States are pursuing a Rispedal lawsuit on behalf of kchildren  who developed breasts on Risperdal.

Lawsuits allege that Johnson & Johnson failed to adequately research the effects of their medication or warn about the connection between Risperdal and breast growth.

Risperdal Lawsuit Update

Although Resperdal is not currently an MDL, settlements for Risperdal breast growth have been reached by Johnson & Johnson in lawsuits bellwether trials where a number of cases are presented to juries to test the potential settlements and outcomes. Do not delay. Call no to discuss a Resperdal lawsuit.
 

 

 

DePuy Hip Replacement Lawsuit News, Hip Replacement Lawyers Filing Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

DePuy Hip Replacement Lawsuit Update

DePuy ASR lawsuit claims stemming from the 2010 DePuy hip recall continue to move forward in courts throughout the country . According to documents filed in California’s San Francisco Superior Court on April 25th, a Plaintiff who had been seeking an expedited trial of her DePuy hip lawsuit is voluntarily seeking dismissal of the case. (Tilman v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al., No. CGC11508806; Calif. Super. Ct., San Francisco).

This news is particularly interesting as when a case is voluntarily dismissed it is often an indication that the parties have come to an agreement. 

DePuy ASR Hip Lawsuits Lawyers Filing DePuy Lawsuits

Court records indicate that there are more than 10,000 DePuy ASR hip lawsuits currently pending in courts throughout the U.S. The DePuy hip recall was announced after the metal-on-metal hip implants were found to be failing in an unacceptably high number of patients. The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) is now reviewing the safety of all metal hip implants, over fears that the devices can shed dangerous amounts of metal debris into patient’s bodies, leading to premature failure of the hips and other serious complications. In January, the agency proposed a new regulation that would make such devices ineligible for the agency’s 510(k) clearance process, which allowed all-metal hips like the ASR hip to gain FDA approval without first undergoing human clinical trials. The FDA also advised doctors to test metal hip implant patients for elevated metal ion levels if they present with symptoms of a failing hip implant.*

The majority of DePuy hip lawsuits have been filed in a multidistrict litigation now underway in U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio. Court records indicate that the first trials in that litigation will begin this September. (In re: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. ASR Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation – MDL 2197) Two lawsuits have already gone to trial at the state level, one of which ended with a California Superior Court jury awarding the Plaintiff more than $8 million in damages. (Kransky v. DePuy, BC456086, California Superior Court, Los Angeles County) However, the jury hearing a second trial in Illinois state court found for DePuy. (Strum v. DePuy, 2011-L-9352, Circuit Court of Cook County) According to an April 16th report from The New York Times, documents submitted as evidence in both of those trials indicated that Johnson & Johnson and its DePuy Orthopaedics unit knew that the ASR was flawed years before the recall was announced, but did not disclose this information to the public or the medical community.**

Earlier this month, DePuy Orthopaedics announced it would end sales of metal-on-metal hip implants, citing recent FDA actions and decreased demand for the products, according to the New York Times. The sales suspension includes a metal-on-metal version of the company’s DePuy Pinnacle hip replacement system, which is also the subject of lawsuits.

If you have a faulty DePuy and have had revision surgery or have been told you need revision surgery call and speak to a hip replacement lawyer today.

Pelvic Mesh Lawyer, Pelvic Mesh Lawsuit

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Pelvic Mesh Lawyers of Class Action Lawyer Network are filing Pelvic Mesh Lawsuits as a part of the Vaginal mesh class action, multi district litigation. We are accepting most states nationwide.

Thousands of Women Are Suffering From the Failed Pelvic Mesh

Class Action Pelvic Mesh Lawyers are filing lawsuits for  women, nationwide hjat have a pelvice mesh, transvaginal mesh (TVT) ,vaginal mesh, bladder slings or transvaginal mesh patches

Pelvic Mesh Complications Are Horrific and Include:

  • Hemorrhage 
  • Urinary tract Infection
  • Chronic Pain 
  • Urinary problems
  • Digestive disconmfort
  • Bowel problems
  • Pelvic pain 
  • Bleeding
  • Recurrence of prolapse
  • incontinence 
  • Intense relentless pain
  • Lower back pain
  • Mesh erosion into vagina, bladder, intestines and uterus 
  • Perforations  of the bowel, bladder or blood vessels
  • Inability to have intimate relations
  • Decrease in quality of life due to discomfort and pain.

To file your pelvic mesh lawsuit call us today.

Dow Corning Breast Implant Removal Benefits Program Launched

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Dow Corning Settlement Trust as has announced a breast implant explant ( removal ) program for women as a part of the Dow Corning Class Action:

If you have filed and registered with Dow Corning regarding your Breast Implant Settlement Claim and need help with the new Breast Implant Explant Program, Dow Corning breast Implant explant lawyers are here to help women with Dow Corning claims.

Dow Corning Breast Implant Explant Letter

The following notice is being sent to all claimants who may be eligible for an Explant ( removal ) claim at the Settlement Facility Dow Corning Trust.

If you have received this letter you should contact Class Action Lawyer Network and speak to one of our Dow Corning Breast Implant Class Action lawyers today. You do not want to do this on your own. Our lawyers can help you with the process and make sure the claim is filed correctly at no cost to you.

If you choose to participate in the Explant Assistance Program, please note that these claims may take upto 60 days to process.
We recommend that you contact the Settlement Facility regarding your status before you schedule your surgery.
The Dow Corning Plan of Reorganization set June 2, 2014 as the deadline for eligible claimants to file a
claim for Explant Benefits.

Eligibility for compensation in Class 5 or 6 for Explant benefits is as follows:
1.Submission of the Proof of Manufacture form and written proof that you were implanted with a DowCorning breast implant
2.Submission of the Explant Claim form and written proof that your Dow Corning implants were removed by June 2, 2014. The Settlement Plan only offers the Explant benefit for the removal of Dow Corning breast implants. No other brands of implants are eligible for this payment.
3.Written proof that you did notreceive a silicone gel breast implant as a replacement after your Dow Corning breast implant was removed. If your Dow Corning breast implants are removed and replaced with a silicone gel implant, you will no longer qualify for payment. You may receive a replacement saline implant or other reconstruction. The Explant Assistance Program (EAP) is an option available to claimants who need financial help to have their implants removed. This program is designed for direct payment to the doctor and/or hospital that provides your explant service. This process may take several months to complete, so it is important to start this process well in advance of the June 2, 2014 deadline. If you wait until the filing deadline, your claim may be denied.
Eligible Claimants are responsible to keep the SF – DCT updated on any change in address and other contact information. Claimants whose contact information is not current may not receive payments for which they are eligible. For copies of the Claim Forms
 further information about the Explant program, EAP, or the deadline contact:
Claims Assistance www.sfdct.com Telephone: 866-874-6099,Email: info@sfdct.comFor additional assistance

The Claimants Advisory Committee:
http://www.tortcomm.org
NOTE: Your claim must meet the definition of an Eligible claim as set forth in Article V of Annex A to the Plan of Reorganization in order to be eligible for payment

 Dow Corning Breast Implant lawyers are here to  to protect your rights under this new program. There is no cost to you for a breast implant explant lawyer.