Class Action Article

  • File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit: Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Talcum Powder Fallopian Tube Cancer Lawsuits Baby  Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Filed If you or a loved one used talcum powder products and were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, or fallopian tube can...

Class Action News

Drug Class Actions

  • Taxotere Lawyers for Permanent Hair Loss: Taxotere Baldness Lawyers For  Permanent Hair Loss Lawsuits Have you received Taxotere for breast cancer? Taxotere can result in hair loss or baldness  that is permanent. Taxotere  is a chemotherapy drug used for the treatment of breas...

Medical Device Lawsuits

  • Zimmer Hip Replacement Lawyers: Network Zimmer Hip Replacement  Lawyer Win $2 Million Against Zimmer Hip Replacement Do You Have A Faulty Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prothesis With Connective Technology and Cobalt Chromium Head? Do You Have Have Metallosis or Chromium Cobalt T...

Posts Tagged ‘scottsdale’

Stockert 3T Heater-Cooler Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Atlanta, Baltimore, Biloxi, Boca Raton, Boston, Charleston, Charlotte, Dallas, Denver, Detroit, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Fort Lauderdale, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas city, Los Angeles, Louisville, Macon, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Miami, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minneapolis, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Provo, st louis, Stocker 3THeater-Cooler Lawyers, Toledo, West Palm Beach

Stockert 3T Heater-Cooler Lawyers For  Wrongful Death Lawsuits

Stockert 3T Heater-Cooler System lawyers are filing failure  to warn lawsuits due to increased risk of infections caused by the Cooler Systems during cardio thoracic surgery.

 Stockert 3T Lawsuits Filed

Lawsuits are being filed against  LivaNova PLC for their  3T heating-cooling system. This system has been found to transmit bacteria into patients during  open-chest cardiac surgery. The nontuberculous mycobacteria causes Mycobacterium chimaera which can result in death,

What is  The 3T Heater-Cooler System?

The 3T heater-cooler units are used during surgery to control  body temperature.  They  have water tanks that move temperature-controlled water to heat exchangers or blankets, which  cool or warm  the recipients body.

 3T Heater-Cooler System Issues

The water  in the 3T systems can become contaminated resulting  in bacteria being released into the air through the device’s exhaust vent. This bacteria can infect a patient. It can take  several years between the time a patient is exposed to the bacteria and an infection is diagnosed.

Have You Had Surgery Using A 3T Cooler Device?

Up To 4 Years After Surgery Look for signs:

  • endocarditis,
  • surgical site infection,
  • abscess, bacteremia,
  • hepatitis,
  • renal insufficiency,
  • splenomegaly,
  • pancytopenia,
  • osteomyelitis.


  • fever of undetermined origin,
  • night sweats,
  • joint pain,
  • weight loss,
  • myalgia,
  • malaise.

Contact our  Stocker 3T Lawyers

Ethicon Physiomesh Lawyer | Hernia mesh Lawsuits Filed

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Ethicon Physiomesh lawyer

Ethicon Physiomesh Hernia Mesh Recall Lawyers

On May 25, 2016, Johnson & Johnson issued an “Urgent Field Safety Notice” to warning  of the higher rates of recurring hernia and the need for revision operations after hernia repair using the Ethicon Physiomesh Composite Mesh. This is the same company that is dealing with hundreds of vaginal mesh lawsuits made of the same substance as the physiomesh.

Physiomesh Hernia Mesh  Complications

  • Hernia Recurrence
  • Scar-like tissue that sticks tissues together
  • Blockage of the large or small intestine
  • Abnormal adhesions between organs, vessels or intestines
  • Fluid build-up at the surgical site
  • Perforation of nearby tissues or organs
  • Migration and shrinkage
  • Bowel perforation and obstruction
  • Migration of the mesh and  erosion resulting in the need for revision or removal

What Is A Physiomesh?

  • Ethicon Physiomesh and vaginal  mesh are both used to provide additional support to weakened or damaged tissue.  It is made from non-absorbable polypropylene (plastic) filaments that are woven into a mesh.
Ethicon Physiomesh Products Recalled ETHICON PHYSIOMESH™ Flexible Composite Mesh
  • PHY0715R
  • PHY1015V
  • PHY1515Q
  • PHY1520R
  • PHY1520V
  • PHY2025V
  • PHY2030R
  • PHY2535V
  • PHY3035R
  • PHY3050R

    Laparoscopic Hernia Pack

  • ELH5 PHY1515
  • ELH10 PHY1515Q
Ethicon Physiomesh Complications? Speak to one our mesh lawyers.  

Hip Replacement Helpline Launched

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Biomet Hip Replacement lawyers, DePuyPinnacle- ASR Hip Replacement lawyers, encore hip replacement lawyers, Medical Device Lawsuits, Omnilife Hip Replacement lawyers, Smith amd Nephew Hip Replacement Lawyers, Wright hip Replacement lawyers

Hip Replacement Lawsuits

Many of the Hip replacement  manufacturers of the metal-on-metal hip implants have recalled their implants for functional defects.  There have been settlement offers on hip replacements for victims of a faulty hip implant or cobalt and chromium poisoning to the blood stream.

Hip Replacement Revision Surgery Lawsuits

Hip replacement or revision surgery is one of the most common orthopedic  procedures performed in the United States.  There have been numerous defective implants placed on the market resulting in needles pain, suffering and revision surgeries

Get A Hip Replacement Lawyer

Below is a  list of cases our hip replacement lawyers   will take a look at.

  1. Stryker Rejuvenate Modular Neck Cases – All
  2. Stryker ABG II Modular neck Cases – All
  3. Stryker Accolade (TMZF) Stem cases with Cobalt Chromium modular heads. These stems have the potential for significant head neck corrosion – All cases with Metallosis.
  4. Wright Medical Conserve Cup (MOM) cases – ALL
  5. Wright Medical Profemur Stem Cases (this is their modular neck design)- These cases are prone to Fracture (either the titanium or CoCr necks) and Metallosis. ALL.
  6. Depuy ASR – ALL
  7. Depuy Pinnacle Metal on Metal (MOM) with modular heads greater than 36 mm.
  8. Zimmer Durom Cup cases with modular heads greater than 36 mm.
  9.  Zimmer M/L Taper Kinectiv Stem cases (this is their Modular neck design)- All cases with Metallosis.
  10.  Biomet M2A 38mm / Magnum MOM cases. ALL cases with Metallosis.
  11.  DJO / Encore MOM hip cases. All cases revised due to Metallosis.
  12.  Omnilife Apex Arc – This is a smaller manufacturer but this device is a mixed metal modular neck device. ALL
  13.  Smith & Nephew R3 (MOM) cup cases. Only cases that have metallosis and were revised or need a revision.
  14. Smith & Nephew SMF stem (this is their mixed metal modular neck product). We have not seen many of these yet but, our hip replacement lawyers are interested in them.

Knee Replacement Lawyers For Knee Replacement Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Smith & Nephew's OXINIUM devices lawyer, Stryker’s Scorpio implant lawyers, Zimmer’s NexGen Natural Knee System implant lawyers

Knee replacement lawsuits are being filed for
  • Zimmer’s NexGen Natural Knee System implant lawyers,
  • Stryker’s Scorpio implant lawyers,
  • Smith & Nephew’s OXINIUM devices lawyer.

Knee Replacement Complications

Complications Lawsuits are Being Filed For: Persistent pain, swelling or stiffness, Deep vein thrombosis, Implant failure within five years, Nerve injuries, Fracturing, chipping and migration and Infections.

Brand Knee Replacements Lawsuit Filings

Knee Replacements Causing Problems Include: DePuy knee, Zimmer NexGen LPS, CR and MIS, Natural Knee System, Stryker Scorpio CR and PS components, Duracon Total Knee, Unicompartmental Knee System, Smith & Nephew Oxinium Genesis II and Profix II, Journey Uni Tibial Baseplate, and Biomet Vanguard CR.

Knee Replacement Recalls

Has your  knee replacement caused debilitating side effects? Have you needed  to undergo revision surgery  to fix or replace the device or to correct complications caused by the device?

Complications  resulting  in a  knee replacement recall include:

Persistent pain of recipient, Infection or drainage, Swelling or inflammation, Damage to surrounding bone, muscle, or nerves

Zimmer NexGen Knee Recalls

While there has not been a total recall on any Zimmer NexGen knee replacement devices, a number of device components have been recalled. In 2010, Zimmer NexGen MIS Tibial Components were recalled due to high incidences of failure associated with the components. The Zimmer NexGen LPS-Flex GSF Femoral Component was also recalled due to evidence of loosening. Additionally, the Zimmer Natural-Knee II Durasul Patella faces a Class II recall. This component is not part of the Zimmer NexGen product line.

Zimmer Recalls

Zimmer NexGen knee recalled components include: NexGen MIS Tibial Components,NexGen TM Tibial Trays, NexGen LPS-Flex GSF Femoral Component, NexGen MIS Modular Tibial Plates and Keels.

Stryker Knee Replacement Recalls

In April 2013, the FDA issued a Class I recall of Stryker’s ShapeMatch Cutting Guide.  The Guides help to position knee replacement components and guide the marking of the patient’s bone prior to cutting. In November 2012, Stryker acknowledged manufacturing defects in the ShapeMatch Cutting Guide and instructed surgeons to discontinue use. This knee replacement recall was because  the software has a defect that causes wider cutting ranges. As a result, knee replacement patients may experience severe complications such as instability of the joint, fracture, chronic pain, and mobility limitations. Patients may also require the need for revision surgery.

Other Knee Replacement Recalls

StrykerDuracon Total Knee, Unicompartmental Knee System, Scorpio PS and CR components, BiometVanguard CR, Smith & Nephew Journey Uni Tibial Baseplate, Oxinium Genesis II and Profix II

Get a Knee Replacement Lawyer

Bard IVC Filter Lawyers | Bard Inferior Vena Cava Filter Alert

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Bard IVC Filter Lawyers, Cook IVC Filter Lawyer, Medical Device Lawsuits

File A Bard IVC Filer Lawsuit For A Failed Bard Inferior Vena Cava Filter

Bard IVC Filter Dangers

Bard  IVC Filters have  certain dangers. The filters can fracture and pieces can migrate and perforate various organs in the body.  Inferior Vena Cava filters are implanted to capture blood clots before they can settle in the brain or lungs resulting in a pulmonary embolism or stroke.

Bard IVC Filter Lawyers Filing Inferior Vena Cava Lawsuits For a Failed

  • Bard Recovery filter;
  • Bard G2 filter;
  • Bard G2 Express filter;
  • Cook Gunther Tulip

Vena Cava Filter Lawsuits Filed

What are the Complications Of The Bard  IVC Filters?

Fracture of the Cook  IVC Filter, Bard IVC Filter Migration, Perforation, Puncture or Serious Damage to the Heart, Lungs or Vena Cava, Internal Bleeding, Hematoma or Nerve Injury at the Puncture Site of the Bard IVC Filter, Inferior Vena Cava Filter related Pulmonary Embolism, Respiratory Distress From the IVC Filter, Infection from the IVC Filter, Shortness of Breath, Death

Get a Bard Inferior Vena Cava Filter Lawyer   File Your Bard  IVC Filter Lawsuit

Lawyers For Yaz, Fosamax, NuvaRing, Pradaxa, Mesh, SSRI’s, Actos,Tylenol, DePuy, Stryker

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in ABG Modular Stem lawyers, Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, APG II Recall Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, DePuy Pinnacle Hip Replacement Updates, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, GranuFlo Dialysis Medication Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Louisiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, revuvinate recall lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Stryker Hip replacement recall lawyer, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Toxic Substances, Transvaginal mesh, Tylenol Liver Damage Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

We continue to accept nationwide vaginal mesh and bladder sling cases, Actos lawsuits, NuvaRing lawsuits, Dialysis medication lawsuits, Pradaxa lawsuits, Hip Replacement lawsuits, SSRI birth defect lawsuits, Tylenol lawsuits, Yaz lawsuits and others.

Vaginal Mesh

Nationwide vaginal mesh and bladder sling cases

Actos Lawyers

Patients have been diagnosed with bladder cancer after consuming the diabetes drug Actos.

Chemical Toxins Leach V Dupont Class Action Lawyers

Patients diagnosed with kidney cancer, testicular cancer, ulcerative colitis and/or thyroid disease who are members of the Leach v. Dupont class.  Leach class definition: a person who drank contaminated water for at least one year prior to December 3, 2004 from one of six named water districts, or specified private drinking water wells contaminated with C-8.  The affected water districts are:

Patients diagnosed with kidney cancer, testicular cancer, ulcerative colitis and/or thyroid disease who are members of the Leach v. Dupont class.  Leach class definition: a person who drank contaminated water for at least one year prior to December 3, 2004 from one of six named water districts, or specified private drinking water wells contaminated with C-8.  The affected water districts are (1) Little Hocking, Ohion (2) Lubeck Public Service District, West Virginia (3) City of Belpre, Ohio (4)  Tuppers Plains, Ohio (5) Mason County Public Service District, West Virginia (6) Village of Pomeroy, Ohio.

Chemical exposure lawyer Little Hocking,

Chemical exposure lawyer Lubeck Public Service District,

Chemical exposure lawyer Belpre,

Chemical exposure lawyer Tuppers Plains,

Chemical exposure lawyer Mason County Public Service District,

Chemical exposure lawyer West Virginia ,

Chemical exposure lawyer Village of Pomeroy

It does not matter where class member now reside, so long as they lived in one of the contaminated areas and drank the water at least one year effective December 3, 2004.

DePuy Hip Pinnacle and ASR Hip Implant Recall Lawyers

Faulty Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants.

Fosamax Lawyers

We are actively pursuing new Fosamax femur fracture cases.  Our intake criteria for these cases is as follows: (1) proof of at least 4 years of Fosamax use or other oral bisphosphonates; (2) fracture of the subtrochanteric or shaft area of the femur; (3) no or minimal trauma associated with the fracture; (4) 80 years old or younger at time of fracture.

Granuflo, Naturalyte Dialysis Mediction Lawyers

We are litigating cases aagainst Fresenius, the German manufacturer and distributor of GranuFlo and NaturaLyte dialysate products. These products are supposed to safely filter and cleanse the bloodGranuFlo/NaturaLyte has been directly linked to unsafe levels of bicarbonate in dialysis patients.

Nuvaring Lawyers

Accepting cases preferably for injuries arising after 2011.  Organon/Merck’s vaginal ring contraceptive drug/device are being actively litigated in both state and federal venues, and have been since late 2007. Plaintiffs allege that NuvaRing increases a woman’s risk of blood clots, heart attack, and stroke above and beyond the risk that is mentioned in the label.

Pradaxa Excessive Bleeding Lawyers

Pradaxa is an anticoagulant drug indicated for patients who have been diagnosed with atrial fibrillation. Pradaxa was heralded as a treatment advance because it is easier to take than its competitor, it also can cause uncontrollable bleeding which cannot be stopped by any antidote.  Accordingly, there have been bleeding events which have lasted for days.  Some clients have been told that there is simply nothing medical science can do to stop the bleeding.  People have died

Lexapro/Celexa, Zoloft, Prozac, Effexor, Wellbutrin and Pax Lawyers

SSRI antidepressant manu­facturers, including Glaxo-SmithKline, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Forest Laboratories, alleging a variety of birth defects from prenatal exposure to these drugs. The products involved include Lexapro/Celexa, Zoloft, Prozac, Effexor, Wellbutrin and Paxil.

Stryker Hip Replacement Lawyers

Litigation against Stryker.  “Rejuvenate” and “ABGII” stem implants were recalled in the summer of 2012, and the failure of these femoral stems has caused enormous damage for those patients as a result of “fretting” in the modular neck- stem junction, leading to corrosion and exposure to large amounts of metallic debris.

Tylenol Lawyers For Liver Damage

Branded Tylenol acetaminophen toxicity causing acute liver failure requiring hospitalization.

Yaz Lawyers

*Only for injuries that occurred before 4/10/2012 as well as from states with 3+ year SOLs and Discovery rules. Cardiovascular injuries caused by Drospirenone (DRSP), the active progestin component in these oral contraceptive pills.  Deep Vein Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, Blood Clots and certain types of Stroke.

Metronic Infuse Bone Graft Lawyers Filing lawsuits For Injury Nationwide

Written by Class Action Lawyer on . Posted in Medical Device Lawsuits

Medtronic’s Infuse Bone Graft Lawyers filing lawsuits for severe debilitating injury from the Metronic Infuse Bone Graft
A recent FDA investigation of Medtronic’s Infuse Bone Graft discovered that the product may cause cancer infection, ectopic bone growth, cyst formation, difficulty breathing, nerve damage, and death when the product is used in the neck and cervical spine. Infuse is not FDA-approved for use in the neck and cervical spine, but Medtronic illegally spent millions of dollars to encourage these dangerous off-label uses and to cover up study results showing the severe injuries caused by Infuse.

Infuse Bone Graft is a liquid form of recombinant bone morphogenic protein that is housed in a small cage-like structure that is implanted in the spine where it facilitates bone growth to fill gaps between vertebrae and replace damaged disks. Infuse is FDA-approved for use only in the lumbar spine and has been proven to be extremely dangerous when it is used in other parts of the body, specifically the neck and cervical spine. When Infuse is used in the neck or cervical spine, it tends to promote unintended bone growth that leads to significant problems such as swelling of the neck, tightening of the airways, and difficulty swallowing, breathing, and speaking.

Despite knowledge of the risks associated with off-label uses of Infuse, Medtronic paid doctors to cover up and discredit unfavorable study results. Medtronic is now under investigation by the FDA for its illegal promotion of Infuse as safe and effective when used in the neck and cervical spine. Metronic is also accused of using the Bone Graft for label use.

For a Metronic Infuse Bone graft lawyer contacr Class Action lawyer Network Today

Vaginal mesh Horror, Vaginal mesh lawyers Filing Vaginal Mesh lawsuits

Written by Class Action Lawyer on . Posted in Multidistrict Lawsuit News

Vaginal mesh Lawyers Filing Lawsuits for Vaginal mesh MDL to Commence Soon

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has recently finished a review of the reports submitted by patients and providers and the most current scientific literature concerning transvaginal mesh surgery.   The results of the review showed that currently there is no evidence which supports the use of transvaginal mesh in transvaginal organ prolapse surgery versus the traditional non-mesh methods.   One of the major factors in coming to this conclusion is that there is an increased risk of complications when undergoing such repair procedures.

The FDA says in a recent alert that “Serious complications associated with surgical mesh for POP procedures and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is not rare.”The FDA continues on by saying, “Furthermore, it is not clear that transvaginal POP repair with mesh is more effective than traditional non-mesh repair in all patients with POP and it may expose patients to greater risk.” 

The thousands of transvaginal mesh cases which the FDA reviewed were dated from 1996 through 2010, and the results that the FDA found that those patients who have had transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair with mesh are exposed to additional risks compared with those who have repair with stitches alone.  The results of the review also showed that, while the mesh did often times correct the anatomy; there was no greater clinical benefit over non-mesh surgery.  There were at least 100,000 pelvic organ prolapse repairs done in 2010 alone, and almost 75,000 of them were transvaginal procedures, according to statistics given by the FDA. According to the advice given by the FDA, doctors should be able to recognize that in many cases, pelvic organ prolapse can be treated without the use of mesh. The FDA also warned clinicians that mesh implants are permanent, and future repairs may be challenging, putting patients at risk for additional complications and surgeries.  Mesh that is placed abdominally, or used to treat SUI are not covered in the current FDA warning.

There has been, however a recent update on this issue:   “Based on assessment of Medical Device Reports (adverse event reports) submitted to the FDA, evaluation of the published literature, and the September 2011 Obstetrics-Gynecology Devices Panel meeting, the FDA is considering the recommendation that urogynecologic surgical mesh used for transvaginal repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) be reclassified from Class II to Class III.”


The Horrors of the vaginal mesh are Beyond Belief. Get a vaginal mesh lawyer today

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Updates | Vaginal Mesh lawyers Filing Lawsuits

Written by Class Action Lawyer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Vaginal mesh Lawyers  are Still filing lawsuits for woem with vaginal mesh Complications. You should not wait. There are statutes of limitations for your state that can effect your filing in the future:

Please note the statute of limitations below

Florida (4 years), Missouri (5 years), Nebraska (4 years), North Dakota (6 years), Utah (4 years) and Wyoming (4 years)
3 year SOL States D.C., Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Vermont, Washington & Wisconsin

1 year (Kentucky, Louisiana & Tennessee)

non-discovery states (Arkansas, Indiana, Maine, New York & South Dakota)

Complications we hear appear to be similiar:

  • Erosion of the mesth thru the vagina wall
  • Infections  that doctors are not relating to the mesh
  • Spot bleeding
  • lower back pain
  • leg and pain on one side of the body
  • severe agonizing pain
  • Inability to have sexual intercourse
  • partners feeling the mesh
  • feeling pieceds of the mesh
  • doctors unsympathetic

YOu must see a Urogynecologist for your medical condition immediately and have a doctor acknowledge it is from the mesh.

You must not wait a retain an attorney immediately.