Class Action Article

  • File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit: Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Talcum Powder Fallopian Tube Cancer Lawsuits Baby  Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Filed If you or a loved one used talcum powder products and were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, or fallopian tube can...

Class Action News

Drug Class Actions

  • Taxotere Lawyers for Permanent Hair Loss: Taxotere Baldness Lawyers For  Permanent Hair Loss Lawsuits Have you received Taxotere for breast cancer? Taxotere can result in hair loss or baldness  that is permanent. Taxotere  is a chemotherapy drug used for the treatment of breas...

Medical Device Lawsuits

  • Get A Hernia Mesh Lawyer | Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Filed: The hernia mesh lawyers of Class Action Lawyer Network are filing hernia mesh lawsuits for victims of a failed hernia mesh. We have Ethicon, Bard and Cook hernia mesh lawyers. Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Filed  For: Ethicon: Physiomesh Pro...

Posts Tagged ‘springfield’

Risperdal Lawyers | Enlarged Breasts in Boys Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Our Risperdal lawyers are accepting cases for unusual breast development in males. Risperdal  $70M Verdict In Philadelphia  Risperdal  Trial Johnson & Johnson was hit with a $70 million verdict on Friday when a  Philadelphia jury found that the antipsychotic drug Risperdal had caused an adolescent boy to grow female breasts. Risperdal and Enlarged Breasts In Young  Males Risperdal   has been linked to enlarged breasts in your males. This is  a condition called gynecomastia. he Growth of male breasts can cause severe emotional distress.  Surgery may be required to correct the condition.  Risperdal may increase levels of prolactin, a hormone which stimulates breast development in women. Young boys who have taken prolactin and are displaying increased levels of this hormone may develop male breasts or gynecomastia. Can I Join The Risperdal Gynecomastia Lawsuits? If you  are a male and have  enlarged female breast call no to see if you qualify to join others in a Risperdal lawsuit. Risperdal is the  brand name for the drug called Risperidone. This is approved to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorders. Risperdal  but has resulted in gynecomastia. Gynecomastia, the development of real female breasts.  It is real breast tissue growth caused by an increase in the hormone prolactin. If you have enlarged breasts with; Pain, Swelling, Tenderness and Nipple discharge and may need surgery  to remove excess breast tissue you may be able to join the Risperdal class action lawsuits. Get A Risperdal Lawyer Lawsuits are being filed against  Johnson & Johnson through its subsidiary Janssen Pharmaceuticals, for  failing to properly inform doctors and patients about the effects of Risperdal.  

St Louis Baby Powder Lawyer | Kansas City Talcum Powder Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Kansas city, st louis, St Louis Talcum Powder lawyer

St Louis – Kansas City Talcum Powder Lawyers

Baby Powder lawyers at Class Action Lawyer Network are filing  St Louis, Columbia/Jeff City , Joplin, Kansas City, Kirksville, Lake Of The Ozarks, SE Missouri, Springfield, and St Joseph Talcum Powder lawsuits for women who have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer after years of using Talcum Powder products on their genital areas.

Missouri Jury Orders $72 Million Verdict  For Baby Powder Victim

In a recent Talcum Powder lawsuit a Missouri jury has ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay a family $72 million. Our  St Louis Talcum powder lawyers are filing Talcum Powder lawsuits for women who have gotten ovarian cancer from Talcum Powder.

Get A St Louis Baby Powder Lawyer

If you think you have gotten ovarian cancer from Talcum powder contact us today to speak to a St Louis  Talcum Powder lawyer

Ohio Talcum Powder Lawyers | Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Cincinnattti Talcum Powder lawyer, Class Action Articles

Ohio  Baby Powder Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis  Lawyers Ohio Talcum Powder Lawyers

Ohio Talcum powder – Ovarian cancer diagnosis  lawyers: Columbus, Cleveland, Toledo, Cincinnati, Akron, Dayton, Parma, Canton, Youngstown, Lorain, Springfield, Hamilton, Kettering,  Elyria,  Middletown, and all of OH. Talcum powder- baby powder ovarian cancer diagnosis lawyers. Toledo Talcum Powder Lawyers Filing

  Talcum Powder Lawsuits

Our Cincinnati  Talcum powder  attorneys are helping women file “Talc-powder products gave me ovarian cancer lawsuits.” Lawsuits  are being filed against  Johnson & Johnson for not warning of the dangers of Talc. in their Baby powder and Shower To Shower products.

Did you Get Ovarian Cancer after using Talcum Powder?

Studies show that Talcum Powder can be linked to  Ovarian Cancer Johnson & Johnson, the same company with 100’s of vaginal mesh lawsuits filed against them, has talcum powder  class-action lawsuits filed against them  claiming they are responsible for giving women ovarian cancer by not warning of the dangers of their  talcum powder products.

Fight Back- File An Ovarian Cancer Lawsuit

The first study linking talc and cancer took place in 1971 and they never told you.

An Ovarian Cancer Patient Won A Lawsuit

The first talcum powder ovarian cancer lawsuit was won against Johnson & Johnson in federal court in 2013.

Evidence of a Link Between Cancer and Talc

The link between ovarian cancer and talcum powder was  discovered in 1971 in a study that found talc particles in the ovarian tissue of  female cancer patients. Talc particles move thru the  vagina and are able to travel  into the ovaries. A South Dakota jury found that Johnson & Johnson failed to warn consumers of the link between the use of their talc powders for feminine hygiene and an increased risk of ovarian cancer.

File Your Ohio  Talcum Powder Lawsuit

Women are waking up  and more  claims will be filed by women who have developed ovarian cancer following the  use of  talcum powder. Have You Used Johnson’s Baby Powder, Shower to Shower, Have You Been Diagnosed With Ovarian Cancer?, Find Out How Talcum Powder Is Linked To Ovarian Cancer, Can Baby Powder Cause Ovarian Cancer?, Find Out If You Have A Case Today    

Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class Action Articles, Talcum Powder cancer lawyers

Lawyers Filing Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits For Baby Powder

Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Do You Want To File A Baby Powder Cancer Lawsuit?

Studies show that talcum-based powder can  cause ovarian cancer in women who have used it for genital/perineal hygiene. Studies dating back to 1982 have consistently linked prolonged talc-based baby and body powder usage with ovarian cancer.  The talc particles moves  through the female reproductive system and settles in the ovaries. These particles may remain in the ovaries for many years, creating inflammation resulting in the development and proliferation of cancer cells. Studies HAVE Linked  Ovarian Cancer to Talc-Based Baby/Body Powder The pathology reports and tissue samples that were used to diagnose the ovarian cancer can now be examined to determine whether your ovarian tissues contain talc particles.  Talc particles can be found in the pelvic lymph nodes, ovaries, and fallopian tubes and take many years to disintegrate and exit the body. The talcum powder cancer lawyers at Class Action Lawyer Network are speaking to women about  talc having  caused your ovarian cancer.

Speak To A Talcum Powder Lawyer

If you have been  diagnosed with ovarian cancer after long term  use of talcum-based products, such as Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder, Shower to Shower, and others  we want to talk to you regarding  filing a talcum powder cancer lawsuit.

Was There Sufficient Warning For Boston Transvaginal Mesh Victims?

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Medical Device Lawsuits, Transvaginal mesh

Did The Manufacturers Of The Transvaginal Mesh And Bladder Sling Give Sufficient Warning?

Boston Vaginal Mesh Lawyers say no in the thousands of transvaginal mesh and bladder sling claims that have been filed in the Pelvic Mesh Repair Lawsuits MDL'Ls.

According to transvaginal mesh lawyers accross the country who are filing vaginal mesh and bladder sling lawsuits the warning was insufficient. For a warning to be sufficient, a transvaginal mesh warning  should appropriately signal danger while simultaneously providing the information in order to use the product appropriately.  A  pharmaceutical or medical device  manufacturer doesn’t necessarily have to discuss matters that are basic medical knowledge.  They are not in a position to control the individual practices  of doctors in every single medical community. 

 Will The Device  Warnings The Transvaginal meshmanufacturers provided  to the doctor relieve them of their duty to warn the patient.

What are some ways that warnings can become inadequate?  Some variables that courts will consider include:  If they are overly broad or too generic, contradictory statements made in the inserts, actions by the sales representatives, and presenting the warning in a way that makes it unlikely to be read.  Remember, every case is different.  In some cases, a doctor might not even bother to read the warnings.  In other cases, the possibility of an adverse reaction is too small to even impact the doctor’s decision.  There have even been cases where a doctor has stated that even if he were given new information, he would have still followed through with his initial decision.

What other possible legal theories being explored?  If a company supplies product related information to the public that amounts to an express warranty, they can be held liable for breach of warranty if the plaintiff can successfully prove that the information was false.

We will be watching the pelvic mesh repair proceedings and waiting to see how they play out.

To file a Transvagina, mesh lawsuit for a Prolene mesh surgicall implanted in: D.C., Daytona, Fort Myers, Ft Lauderdale,  Gainesville,  Jacksonville,  Keys,  Lakeland, Miami, Ocala, Orlando, Panama City, Pensacola, Sarasota, St. Augustine,  Boston, Springfield,  Worcester, Ann Arbor, Detroit,  Grand Rapids, Jackson, Lansing, Minneapolis,  St Paul, Charlotte. Fayetteville,  Greensboro,  Raleigh, Wilmington, Winston Salem, Fargo, Providence,  Charleston, Columbia,  Florence, Greenville, Seattle, Tacoma, Charleston,  Wisconsin, Milwaukee,  Cheyenne,  Casper,  Laramie,  Gillette, Milwaukee, Montana, Billings, Springfield, Detroit, Grand Rapids, Omaha ,Manchester, Albuquerque, Charlotte, Raleigh, Greensboro, Winston-Salem, Durham,  Fayetteville,  Wilmington, Providence, Charleston  Seattle, Milwaukee, Madison,  Green Bay, Casper or Laramie call Class Action Lawyer Network transvaginal mesh attorneys today.

Gynemesh Transvaginal Mesh Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Gynemesh Class Action Lawyers are filing lawsuits against the manufacturers of the Gynemesh transvsagina mesh Implant in 3, 4, 5 and 6 year product liability statute states.

Our Gynemesh Class Action  Lawyers Are Accepting Transvaginal mesh Lawsuits

For Gynemesh Vaginal Mesh Surgically Implanted In The Following 3, 4, 5 and 6 year product liability statute states.

 D.C, Florida, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska,  New Hampshire, New Mexico,  North Carolina,  Rhode Island, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

   Ethicon Gynecare Prolift Pelvic Mesh Lawsuits For Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh

    Ethicon Gynecare Prosima Pelvic Mesh
    Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh
    Ethicon Prolene Mesh
    Ethicon Gynecare TVT Sling

An Ethicon Gynemesh  vaginal mesh or bladder sling lawsuits are being filed  for women who have experienced complications.

Gynemesh Complications Include

  •     Infection
  •     Erosion of the Mesh
  •     Urinary Problems
  •     Digestive problems
  •     Pelvic Pain
  •     Re Prolapse
  •     Injury to Nearby Organs
  •     Difficulty during intimacy

The FDA has received reports of problems with Ethicon Gynemesh vaginal mesh implants

Overview Of  Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh

Gynecare Gynemesh was first introduced in October 2002. Gynemesh is also called the Gynecare GynemeshPS, nonabsorbable Prolene Soft Mesh, for vaginal wall prolapse surgical treatment.

What Is Ethicon Gynemesh?

Ethicon Gynemesh is porous, which allows surrounding tissues to grow into and incorporate the material as part of the body, which can create severe complications. If you are a victim of a faulty Gynemesh Vaginal Mesh

Speak To A Gynemesh Lawsuit Attorney Today

DePuy Recalls Custom Joint Implants, DePuy Recall Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class MDL Class Action News, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Medical Device Lawsuits, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Product Recall News, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Class action lawyers announce another DePuy recall: DePuy Hip replacement and custom joint implants

DePuy has been forced to recall another product. FDA Forces DePuy Recall of Custom Joint Implants
September 5, 2012 by: Linda Grayling

DePuy Orthopaedics is being forced to recall yet another line of hip and other artificial joint implants. This time, the Johnson & Johnson subsidiary is pulling back its custom orthopedic devices because of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety concerns. The recall notice was issued on August 24 — two years after its ASR hip-implant recall.

DePuy agreed in January 2012 to stop manufacturing the custom devices after a warning letter from the FDA. In it, the agency said the implants were being sold without federal approval, which requires an application with the FDA and clinical trials. DePuy argued that the devices were exempt because they were already approved by the FDA and modified only by doctors’ prescriptions, which is permitted by law.

But the FDA disagreed: “Although the devices’ size and shape may vary with each patient’s anatomy, the standardized design characteristics do not vary among the devices manufactured. The fact that final specifications are tailored to match a patient’s anatomy does not preclude a clinical study or submission of a marketing application for the devices.”

The FDA also said DePuy used poor quality-control systems in the production of the 14 types of custom implants. It ordered the company to recall any implants that had been delivered to surgeons prior to the halt in manufacturing earlier this year. More than 8,300 customized DePuy implants have been sold since 1999, but the number of unused devices in the recall is unknown.

DePuy already is dealing with a massive global recall of 93,000 ASR hip-replacement and hip-resurfacing devices that was announced in August 2010. The defective metal-on-metal hip implants have been shown to fail within a few years, resulting in painful revision surgeries. Typically, all-metal hip implants are expected to last about 15 years.

In addition, the DePuy artificial hips produce metal shavings when the ball and socket components grind against each other, causing metallosis, or metal poisoning of the blood. One British study found that when the metal debris becomes embedded in surrounding tissues, it increases the patient’s risk of bladder and kidney cancers.

In the United States, more than 8,000 patients have filed lawsuits against DePuy over their dangerous hip implants. Of those, 6,000 federal cases are part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL) that is being overseen by Judge David A. Katz in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The first case in the MDL is expected to go to trial in March or April 2013.

The remaining state cases are winding their way through the courts. The first three DePuy ASR lawsuits, which were scheduled to be tried together in Las Vegas, Nevada, were settled out of court recently. Bloomberg reported the plaintiffs each received about $200,000.

Coopvision Avaira Toric Contact Lense Lawyers, Lawsuits on the rise

Written by Class Action Lawyer on . Posted in Product Recall News

Class Action lawyer Network announces a new helpline for Avaira Toric Contact Lense Complications. CooperVision is  recalling  the Avaira Toric brand contact lenses because they were manufactured and distributed with unintended silicone residue. This harmful adulteration has led to serious  eye complications including eye pain, blurring, haziness of vision, and even total vision loss. There are increasing reports of serious eye injuries including corneal ulcers, corneal lesions, corneal abrasions, corneal edema, corneal erosion, and keratitis. Other complaints include blurry or hazy vision often described as a white or opaque film over the eye, severe eye pain, burning, redness, dryness, light sensitivity, and vision impairment. While some users may suffer only temporary side effects, others may require urgent medical care or experience permanent vision loss.The CooperVision Avaira Toric contact lens recall has been classified by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) as a Class I Recall, which means that using the product can potentially lead to severe side effects and complications. There can be sever damage to the eyes. If you or a loved one is useing the Coopervision Avaira Contact lenses and showing side effects see you eye doctor immediately and call Class Action Lawyer network for an immediate case review.

Anyone who used Avaira Toric contact lenses or Avaira Sphere contact lenses who has suffered adverse side effects or whose contact lenses are affected by the Avaira contact lens recall should contact a medical device or contact lens Class Action Lawyer Network attorney who will evaluate your case. It is also very important to keep the contact lenses and all original packaging because this is evidence that will be important in a lawsuit.

Call Class Action lawyer Network for a free CooperVision Avaira Toric Contact Lens Recall Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one has been injured by CooperVision Avaira Toric contact lense recall contact  the Class Action lawyer Network. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a lawsuit against CooperVision.

 

 

Anyone who used Avaira Toric contact lenses or Avaira Sphere contact lenses who has suffered adverse side effects or whose contact lenses are affected by the Avaira contact lens recall should contact a medical device or contact lens Class Action Lawyer Network attorney who will evaluate your case. It is also very important to keep the contact lenses and all original packaging because this is evidence that will be important in a lawsuit.

Call Class Action lawyer Network for a free CooperVision Avaira Toric Contact Lens Recall Lawsuit Evaluation: If you or a loved one has been injured by CooperVision Avaira Toric contact lense recall contact  the Class Action lawyer Network. You may be entitled to compensation by filing a lawsuit against CooperVision.