Class Action Article

  • File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit: Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Talcum Powder Fallopian Tube Cancer Lawsuits Baby  Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Filed If you or a loved one used talcum powder products and were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, or fallopian tube can...

Class Action News

Drug Class Actions

  • Taxotere Lawyers for Permanent Hair Loss: Taxotere Baldness Lawyers For  Permanent Hair Loss Lawsuits Have you received Taxotere for breast cancer? Taxotere can result in hair loss or baldness  that is permanent. Taxotere  is a chemotherapy drug used for the treatment of breas...

Medical Device Lawsuits

  • Get A Hernia Mesh Lawyer | Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Filed: The hernia mesh lawyers of Class Action Lawyer Network are filing hernia mesh lawsuits for victims of a failed hernia mesh. We have Ethicon, Bard and Cook hernia mesh lawyers. Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Filed  For: Ethicon: Physiomesh Pro...

Posts Tagged ‘vaginal mesh lawsuit’

Johnson And Johnson Hip Replacement Lawsuit Payouts

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in DePuy Pinnacle Hip Replacement Updates

Johnson will be paying  $2.5 billion in the ASR and Pinnacle . hip implant settlements

NEW YORK (Reuters) – A unit of Johnson & Johnson has agreed to pay an estimated $2.5 billion to settle thousands of lawsuits from individuals allegedly injured by the company's artificial hip implants, the company announced Tuesday.

The settlement, announced during a hearing in federal court in Ohio on Tuesday, would compensate an estimated 8,000 patients who underwent surgery to replace their hip implants, according to a statement from Johnson & Johnson unit Depuy Orthopaedics Inc and DePuy Hip Replacement  lawyers for the victims.

al The company was defending more than 12,000 lawsuits in U.S. state and federal court over injuries allegedly caused by its metal-on-metal ASR hip-replacement systems, according to a regulatory filing.

Depuy recalled the ASR hip system in 2010, after data suggested that it failed at a higher-than-expected rate. At the time, the company had sold about 93,000 systems worldwide.

Metal hip implant systems like Depuy's ASR hips were designed to be more durable, replacing a traditional metal-on-plastic ball-and-socket design. Instead, some patients who received the ASR hips reported experiencing pain, swelling, joint dislocation and sometimes damage to the central nervous system, thyroid and heart.

The settlement would compensate plaintiffs who have undergone surgery to replace their hips as of August 31, 2013, the company said Tuesday. The company estimated that 8,000 plaintiffs would be eligible.

There is no cap on the amount of individual claims, according to Peter Flowers, one of the lead lawyers for the plaintiffs. Eligible U.S. plaintiffs can seek compensation for costs associated with their revision surgery, as well as payments of qualified liens by healthcare providers associated with the surgery, Flowers said.

You Can Opt To Continue The Lawsuit and Not Accept The Offer

Plaintiffs who opt not to participate in the program, or those who have not undergone revision surgery to replace their implants, will continue to litigate.

The company said it will continue to defend itself in the remaining lawsuits not resolved by the agreement. It also said that it expected the cost of the settlement program to be covered by reserves it had previously set aside, and did not expect to record an additional charge in connection with the agreement.

"The U.S. settlement program provides compensation for eligible patients without the delay and uncertainty of protracted litigation," said Andrew Ekdahl, president of Depuy Synthes Joint Reconstruction, in a statement.

The settlement is not subject to court approval, according to a Johnson & Johnson spokeswoman, Lorie Gawreluk.

Johnson and Johnson Faces Risperdal Lawsuits

The announcement comes just weeks after Johnson & Johnson announced it would pay $2.2 billion to resolve civil and criminal probes into its marketing of several medications, including the anti-psychotic drug Risperdal.

Johnson and Johnson Faces Vaginal Mesh Implant Lawsuit

The Ethicon subsidiary is also a defendant in more than 23,000 lawsuits over vaginal mesh implants, according to a quarterly filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

If you or a loved on has a failed DePuy Pinnacle or ASR and has needed revision surgery call us for a hip replacement lawyer. We are alo accepting Risperdal and vaginal mesh lawsuits.

Female Class Action Lawsuit Lawyers For Women

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Actos Lawsuit Lawyers, Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class Action Articles, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, GranuFlo Dialysis Medication Lawyers, Hawaii Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Louisiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mirena IUD Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Stryker Hip replacement recall lawyer, Stryker Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate Hip replacement recall lawyers, Tennessee Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Toxic Substances, Tylenol Liver Damage Lawsuits, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

It has become apparent that there is a large number of drugs and devices class actions that have been filed against manyfacturers that have targeted women.

We can start with the Dow Corning  siicone  breast implant class action of years ago.  Women are still suffering today. The Dow Corning Trust just recently launched a silicone breast implant explant program.  The leaking silicone and bursting implants  lead to toxicity related immune system diseases like lupus and fibromylagia and other immune deficiency diseases. Women to this date are still suffering from their Dow silicone Breast Implants and the Dow Corning settlement trust is stll living out payments like the new breast explant program.

          Fosamax was supposed to cure osteoporosis but ended up  causing femur fractures.Then we have Yaz and Yasmine birth control pills. Young women were having their lives  altered by pre-mature strokes, pulmonary embolisms, deep vein thrombosis, blood clots  and heart attacks.  Many girls harmed were  barely starting a college life.

       History moves along to the metal on metal and metal componednt hip replacements like the  DePuy Pinnacle and ASR Hip Replacement and the Stryker Rejuvinate and ABG II Modular Stems. These are  a metal on metal hip replacement recalled for their  need for revision surgery. These hip replacements failed  in women more then men. The  smaller frame of a women makes the device more prone to problems in the female structure.

NuvaRing Lawsuits

NuvRing has been another disaster for women causing:

    blood clots in women
    cerebral thrombosis in women
    deep vein thrombosis
    heart attack in women
    pulmonary embolism
    retinal thrombosis in women
    stroke or cerebral hemorrhage
    thrombophlebitis and venous thrombosis with or without embolism
    toxic shock syndrome

Fosamax Lawsuits

Fosamax for osteoporosis actually causes what it is prescribed to fix , femur fractures.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

   The biggest and most horrific is the  the various vaginal mesh devices for urinary incontinence and uterine, bladder and bowel prolapse. This mesh device is made of a Prolene plastic synthetic fiber that has been falling aprt in women. Thousands of  women across the country are screaming the horrors of the vaginal mesh and lawsuits are being filed in droves. Women are in severe pain described  as razor blades. The mesh  has been reported by female victims to be  eroding thru the vaginal wall and at times into the bladder and bowel.  Women can no longer have sexual intercourse and marriages are falling apart. Women are losing their jobs and cannot work.  And then we have  the Mirena IUD which has been gravitating our of postion and ending up embedded in the uterus or a nearby organ.

Lives are being ruined and justice must be sought. Lawsuits are the only thing these manufacturers understand.

 

Nationwide Bladder Sling Lawyer Outreach, Bladder Sling Lawsuits Being Filed

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Bladder Sling Lawyers, Bladder Sling Lawyers Filing Nationwide Bladder Sling Lawsuits

The bladder sling lawyers of Class Action Lawyer Network are accepting all nationwide bladder sling lawsuits. Lawsuits are being filed as a part of the consolidated MDL'S in West Virginia.

What Is A Bladder Sling?

Bladder slings are used to treat urinary incontinence by implanting  a sling around the urethra. The bladder sling is attached to the abdominal wall or pelvic bone. The bladder sling is a vaginal mesh device, and has all the complications for which TVT lawsuits are being filed.

Bladder Sling Complications

Erosion thru the vaginal wall 

Erosion into the bladder,

Pain during sexual intercourse,

Bleeding,

Infection,

Perforation of bladder, colon,

Urinary incontinence

Problems voiding.

Our bladder sling lawyers are  filing bladder sling lawsuits for  women. You must file a bladder sling lawsuit quickly, as the statute of limitations is running very close in many states.

 The manufacturers are:

    Bard Avaulta Support System MDL No. 2187

    AMS Elevate Prolapse Repair System MDL No. 2325

    AMS Apogee Vault Suspension System

    AMS Perigee System

    AMS Monarc Sling System

    AMS Sparc Sling System

    Ethicon Gynecare Gynemesh MDL No. 2327

    Ethicon Gynecare Prolene Soft Mesh

    Ethicon Gynecare Prolift Pelvic Floor Repair System

    Ethicon Gynecare TVT Transvaginal Sling

    Boston Scientific Pinnacle Pelvic Floor Repair Kit MDL No.2326

    Boston Scientific Uphold Vaginal Support System

Vaginal Mesh Multi District Lawsuit List Consolidated Under Judge Goodwin in West Virginia

    MDL – 2325, IN RE: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL No. 2187 | In RE: CR Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2326 IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2327 IN RE: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
 

Our experienced bladder sling lawyes ready to file bladder sling lawsuits  slings problem lawsuits.  Vaginal mesh products have many different names. Do not assume your bladder sling is not covered in the TVT lawsuits  until you speak to one of our bladder sling  lawyers. Many states have a  statue of limitations issue. Time is of the essence. Call our nationwide bladder sling lawyers today.

Did You Take Yaz Or Yasmin? Settlements For Yaz Lawsuits For Bloodclots

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Yaz, Yasmin Lawsuit  Multidistrict Litigation


MDL 2100 – Yasmin and YAZ (Drospirenone) Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, multidistrict litigation (MDL) in Illinois federal court.


Yaz lawyers are accepting Yaz lawsuits for blood clot related injuries:

  • Pulmonary Embolism
  • Blood Clots
  • Stokes
  • Deep Vein Thrombosis

Bayer is facing thousands of Yaz and Yasmin lawsuits involving blood clot related injuries.

Yaz Blood Clot Settlements

According to Bayer’s 2nd Quarter 2013 Statement, Bayer  haa agreed to pay more than $1.4 billion to resolve an estimated 6,700 lawsuits from women  who suffered a:
    Heart attack or Stroke from Yaz or Yasmin
    Pulmonary Embolism from Yaz or Yasmin
    Deep Vein Thrombosis from Yaz or Yasmin

There are still  more than 5,000 additional claims involving a thrombosis blood clot related injury.  Bayer is continuing negotiating on a case-by-case basis, after complete documentation and presentation of the claim by an attorney. It is not too late to file your Yaz blood clot lawsuit. Our Yaz lawyers are still  continuing to review and evaluate potential claims from women who suffered a pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, heart attack, stroke or other blood clot injury while using Yaz, Yasmin or Ocella.

If you or a loved one has been injured by Yaz or a loved one has died from a Yaz related injury call us for a Yaz lawyer today.
 

Women With Dow Corning Breast Implants Are Still Waiting AS Vaginal Mesh Bellwether Trials Begin

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

The Dow Corning Breast Implant Class Action was the largest class action in history effecting women until the vaginal mesh. Now women are watching the Bellwether trials hoping for justice as women with Dow Corning Breast Implants are still waiting.

Claimants in Dow Corning Breast Implant Lawsuit Waiting

As one woman says:

We have all been waiting for our disbursement from the Court that was awarded us because of our problems with the Dow Corning Breast Implant Lawsuit. This award was made over 20 years ago. Please feel free to use this letter in your pursuit of your share of the proceeds from this lawsuit. I am interested in getting this settled and getting paid, and I know you are, also.

Will women destroyed by the vaginal mesh have the same problems?

 

March 4, 2013

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

This letter is to all claimants under the Dow Corning Breast Implant Suit.

We have been told that an oral argument is being made before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit as to whether or not Dow Corning can claim a credit for interest earned on the Initial Payment that was made before the Effective Date of the Plan. It was successfully argued by the CAC that the bankruptcy settlement provided that the claimants, not Dow Corning, would get the benefit of the interest earned on the Initial Payment.

The hearing went well and the Court took the Issue under advisement. We expect a ruling to come sometime in 2013. So far there are not any updates on this ruling.

The Courts need to realize that Dow has been making appeals on this case for too many years. Dow Corning has let it be known that there is plenty of money in its Settlement Fund to pay the current claimants and those who may claim in the future, but they continually object to actually making these payments, hoping to be able to keep any and all interest due on these payments. It has been argued that the claimants are to get the interest and this ruling is what the claimants are waiting on SO THAT THEY CAN FINALLY GET PAID.

As one of the claimants, I feel that after almost 20 years of trying to collect from Dow Corning, I should be the one to benefit from the additional interest earned by the Settlement Fund, not Dow Corning or their attorneys. The accrued interest aside, I want to be paid now because of the financial burden imposed on myself and the thousands of other claimants over the years. Personally, I am in danger of losing my home and car. It is hard for me to pay for medicine and food. Even though food stamps are available, many states are reducing the amounts paid out. My attorney surely deserves his reward after all the years of providing me with support and advice.

These premium payments could be a welcome injection into the critical financial situation in which most of the country finds itself. These women claimants have had to put off purchases that are normally made each year, such as insurance, new clothes, new vehicles to replace not-so-reliable old ones, and other items that many persons take for granted.

Women have really been taken advantage of in so many ways – almost comparable to being raped. They have suffered mentally, financially and physically. Time moves very slowly when you think you have been forgotten and the Courtroom seem to go on and on. I will be 78 years old in September of 2011. I have waited 20 years for the premium payments since I first applied as a claimant. I doubt I can wait another 20 years.

How long can Dow Corning use the Courts to avoid paying these poor women?

As we look at the past for women whose lives were destroyed by Dow Corning Breast Implants we can only wonder what the future holds for 1000's of vaginal mesh victims. Our vaginal mesh lawyers are here to help you. Our Breast Implant lawyers are here to help you. We are lawyers helping woman.

Vaginal Mesh Bellwether Trials Updated

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class MDL Class Action News, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Medical Device Lawsuits, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

Get Your  Mesh lawsuit Attorney Today

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Updates

The vaginal mesh Class action ( multi-distict litigation ) may very well be the largest since the Dow Corning Breast Implant Class Action. The bellwether trials are progressing. Below are the updated reports. A bellwether trial sets the tone of expectation for a juries reaction to injuries, So far the juries have spoken in favor of the victims.

Bard Bellwether Trial, The First of Four Bellwether Trials

A jury  found C.R. Bard iiable for injuries and  must pay $2 million to a woman who sued saying she suffered injuries from the company’s vaginal-mesh implant, a jury found. Today’s jury verdict in Charleston, West Virginia, was the first in a federal court out of more than 5,000 claims over the devices. Jurors deliberated about 12 hours over two days before finding Murray Hill-based Bard liable for injuries that Donna Cisson blamed on its Avaulta line of devices. The jury awarded $250,000 in compensatory damages for Cisson’s injuries plus $1.75 million in punitive damages.

Boston Scientific Next

The first Boston Scientific  round of trials will begin on February 11, 2014, and will involve lawsuits filed over injuries  related to the use of the Pinnacle mesh products.
The second round will start on June 17, 2014, and will involve cases brought against Obtryx pelvic mesh. (In re: Boston Scientific Corp., Pelvic Repair Systems Products Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2326)

Boston Scientific is just one of several manufacturers involved in litigations for surgical mesh lawsuits established in the Southern District of West Virginia.

Johnson and Johnson Trial Updates

A jury in Atlantic City ordered Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon unit to pay $11.1 million to a woman who suffered severe injuries from its vaginal mesh device.

Vaginal Mesh Overview

C.R. Bard’s products include:

Bard Pelvitex
Bard Pelvisoft
Bard Pelvilace or Pelvicol
Bard Utrtex
Bard Uretex TO
Bard Uretex TOO2
Bard Uretex TOO3

Bard Align
Avaulta Plus™
Avaulta Solo™
BioSynthetic Support System
Faslata® Allograft
Synthetic Support System

Coloplast Vaginal Mesh Products

    Novasilk Synthetic Flat Mesh
    Restorelle Smartmesh
    Exair Mesh

  
Johnson & Johnson products include:

Gynecare Prosima
Gynecare TVT Exact
Gynecare TVT Abbrevo
Gynecare TVT Retropubic System
Gynecare TVT
Gynecare TVT Obturator
Gynecare TVT Secur
Gynecare Gynemesh PS
Gynecare Prolift
Gynecare Prolift+M

Cook Medical Surgical Products

    Cook Medical Surgical
    Surgisis Biodesign Tension-Free Urethral Sling,
    Surgisis Biodesign
    Anterior Pelvic Floor Graft,
    Surgisis Biodesign Posterior Pelvic Floor Graft,
    Cook Urological Stratasis

AMS’s products include:

AMS MiniArc Precise Single-Incision Sling
AMS MiniArc Single Incision Sling
AMS Monarc Subfascial Hammock
AMS In-Fast Ultra Transvaginal Sling
AMS BioArc
AMS Sparc Self-Fixating Sling System
AMS Elevate
AMS Perigree
AMS Apogee
  
Boston Scientific products include:

Boston Scientific Arise
Boston Scientific Pinnacle
Boston Scientific Advantage Fit
Boston Scientific Lynx
Boston Scientific Obtryx
Boston Scientific Prefyx PPS
Boston Scientific Solyx

Vaginal Mesh Multi District Lawsuit List Consolidated Under Judge Goodwin in West Virginia

    MDL – 2325, IN RE: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL No. 2187 | In RE: CR Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2326 IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2327 IN RE: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2387 IN RE: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation
    Cook Medical Surgical will be the 5th MDL

Vaginal Mesh Bellwether Trials

Vaginal Mesh bellwether trials are selected to determine how similar vaginal mesh  lawsuits might turn out for the victims.  It’s a chance to see how juries will respond to the injury  claims when there are a large number of lawsuits with similar complaints. This  is very important to our vaginal mesh  lawyers.

 

Will There Be A Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Tolling Agreement? What Is a Tolling Agreement?

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Medical Device Lawsuits

Class Action Lawyer Network vaginal mesh  lawyers are waiting for the results of the signing of a tolling agreement for the vaginal mesh lawsuits. When this tolling agreement is signed vaginal mesh plaintiffs will hopefully have a few more months to get justice amd the courts will have some time to process an unpredented number of lawsuits.

What is a Tolling Agreement?

Legal Definition of Tolling Agreement
By Joseph Nicholson, eHow Contributor

Statutes of limitations generally limit the period after an occurrence in which a claim can be brought. Despite the concrete period specified in such statutes, however, determining exactly when the right to file a claim will be lost can be difficult to know with certainty. A tolling agreement between the parties to the potential claim can be used to create certainty that benefits both sides.

 Purpose Of A Tolling Agreement For A Dangerous Device Lawsuit Like The Vaginal Mesh

        The purpose of a tolling agreement is to prevent the loss of a right because of a statute of limitations. The terms of the agreement can be negotiated by the parties, usually through their attorneys. Ultimately, the parties entering the tolling agreement agree to waive the statute of limitations for either some predetermined period or up until some precedent condition.

    What Is The Benefit to the  Plaintiff

        Tolling agreements most obviously benefit a would-be plaintiff. A statute of limitations would ordinarily bar a claim, such as a personal injury tort claim, a breach of contract claim or collection of a debt. Because the plaintiff has to have enough facts to meet basic pleading requirements before the suit can continue, bringing the complaint together can sometimes be a race against the statute of limitations. By extending the period of time during which a claim can be filed, the plaintiff preserves the right to sue when the right might otherwise be lost.

   What Is  the  Benefit to Defendant

        Why a potential defendant might agree to a tolling agreement might not seem immediately apparent, but there can actually be significant benefit to the defendant. Offers to make a tolling agreement often occur within the context of settlement negotiations. If a defendant has determined that it would prefer to settle rather than defend against litigation, it might be willing to toll the statute of limitations period to allow negotiations to be completed. Otherwise, the plaintiff might be forced to file suit simply to preserve its right.
    Certainty

        A mutually beneficial reason to enter a tolling agreement is to create certainty about when a suit can be filed. For a variety of reasons, there can be ambiguity about when a plaintiff’s right to sue terminates even with the existence of a statute of limitations. Drafting a tolling agreement gives both sides the opportunity to define the outer limits of the limitations period, with an extension given in exchange for a promise not to sue after a certain date or condition. This certainty makes it easier for both sides to assess their relative positions and conduct effective negotiations.
    Initiation

        There are several reasons why even an apparently clear statute of limitations period may be ambiguous. A common reason is that though a statute of period is clear on how long it should last–for example, five years–there can be confusion as to exactly when it started. Many statutes of limitations do not begin until the plaintiff knows or should reasonably have known when the even giving rise to the cause of action occurred. For example, it may not be immediately clear after a surgery that the patient was a victim of malpractice. A plaintiff shouldn’t necessarily be barred from recovery because there was no way to know he was a victim until after the statute of limitations expired. But determining exactly when the patient should reasonably have known can be difficult.
    Laches

        Another reason for ambiguity is the doctrine of laches. This is a principle of fairness that can be used to prevent a plaintiff filing a suit even before the statute of limitations period has expired. A plaintiff who has slept on his rights and not filed suit when he could have and the result has prejudiced the defendant because evidence has been lost or destroyed, or for other reasons, can be barred from filing by the doctrine of laches. Defendants often raise the defense of laches, but it is rarely effective. Nevertheless, the potential for ambiguity is another reason to create a tolling agreement that more clearly defines the parties’ relative rights to sue and be free from suit.

Read more: Legal Definition of Tolling Agreement | eHow http://www.ehow.com/about_6391028_legal-definition-tolling-agreement.html#ixzz2Ui7Qhrwv

Current Important Class Action, Dangerous Drugs and Devices Multi District Litigations In the News

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in ABG II Lawyers, ABG Modular Stem lawyers, Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, APG II Recall Lawyers, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, GranuFlo Dialysis Medication Lawyers, Hawaii Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Infuse Bone Graft Lawywrs, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Product Recall News, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Stryker Hip replacement recall lawyer, Stryker Rejuvinate Hip replacement recall lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Transvaginal mesh, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

The following dangrous drugs and devices are appearing in lawyer ads and email blasts across the country.: Vaginal Mesh, Transvaginal Mesh, Pelvic mesh, Surgical mesh,  Bladder sling, Stryker Rejuvinate hip replacement, Stryker ABG Modular II Stems, Yaz, and Mesothelioma. The following dangrous drugs and devices are appearing in lawyer ads and email blasts across the country.:

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Women nationwide in the thousands are filing vaginal mesh lawsuits for severe mesh complications. The vaginal mesh lawsuits have been consolidated and the bellwether trials are moving ahead.

Vaginal Mesh Multi District Lawsuit List Consolidated Under Judge Goodwin in West Virginia

    MDL – 2325, IN RE: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2326 IN RE: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2327 IN RE: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation
    MDL – 2387 IN RE: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

TransVaginal Mesh Lawsuits

These are still the same Prolene mesh which is causing severe complication, just unsder another name

Pelvic Mesh Lawsuits

Still the same Prolene mesh and vaginal mesh lawyers, transvaginal mesh lawyers, and pelvic mesh lawyers are filing vaginal mesh lawsuits for all of these

Surgical Mesh Lawsuit, Bladder Sling Lawsuits

Still the same vaginal mesh lawsuit products

Stryker Rejuvinate and ABG Modular II Stems Hip Replacement

Class action Stryker lawsuit lawyers are filing lawsuit for the failed Stryker hip replacement where revision surgery is needed. We suggest you see an orthpedic doctor immediately.

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation is considering  forming an MDL to handle the growing number of Stryker lawsuits. Both the Rejuvenate and the ABG II hip implants were recalled in July 2012. This was done due to  reports that  the implants were  causing  complications including loosening of the joint, corrosion, and increased risk of inflammation as well as metal toxicity.  Many  victims of these  failed devices have had to undergo revision surgery to remove and replace them long before they reached the end of their expected 15-20 year lifespan. On March 18, 2013, Stryker filed a brief with the JPML, agreeing that coordination of lawsuits involving the recalled devices was appropriate.

Yaz Lawsuit

Yaz class action lawyers  are accepting Yaz cases for blood clots, stroke, pulmonary embolism and untimely death of young women.

As of February 12, 2013, Bayer had reached agreements, without admission of liability, to settle the claims of approximately 4,800 Yaz victims  in the U.S. for a total amount of about US$1 billion," according to the annual report.

Bayer also said that it, "is only settling claims in the U.S. for venous clot injuries (deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism) after a case-specific analysis of medical records on a rolling basis. Such injuries are alleged by about 3,200 of the pending unsettled claimants. Bayer will continue to consider the option of settling individual lawsuits in the U.S. on a case-by-case basis.

 

Mesothelioma Lawsuit

1000's of hard working citizens are starting to show signs of mesothelioma from asbestos exposure on the job. Class action lawyers for Mesothwlioma victims and their families are here to help you.

 

 

 

Bellwether Trials Ready For 2013, Lawyers Filing Vaginal Mesh and DePuy Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class MDL Class Action News, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, NYC Class Action Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

What is a Bellwether case?

It meets the needs of thousands of plaintiffs all injured by a particular product or group of products. The courts cannot handle thousands of trials. There is no other feasible way for the courts to handle this enormous caseload. The 2013 big bellwether cases going to trial are the  vaginal mesh and DePuy hip replacement. This approach has been used in many cases including asbestos, mesothelioma cases.. A group of plaintiffs are chosen to represent all the plaintiffs.  The verdicts from this group is  used for   the remaining plaintiffs’ cases. The actual results may be utilized for setting a value for  groups of claims in settlements. The plaintiffs can also choose to continue with their own individual trials with their own attorney.

Important Bellwether Trials for 2013

Vaginal Mesh

The first bellwether trials in the Transvaginal Mesh MDL (Multidistrict Litigations) are scheduled to start at the end of 2013.

A status conference for  five vaginal mesh implant lawsuit MDLs was called on December 6, 2012 to announce the first three bellwether trials that will begin in December of 2013. The U.S. District Judge that is overseeing the trials in the Southern District of West Virginia, Judge Joseph R. Goodwin, has scheduled the three bellwether trials which will involve three different vaginal mesh implant manufacturers as defendants.

  • American Medical Systems
  • Ethicon 
  • Boston Scientific.

These "bellwether" trials should give women, and attorneys, a better idea of the viability of their lawsuits and the basis for compensation. Four of the multi-district litigations (MDL) around the country will begin this year, with the earliest starting this month in New Jersey. Another MDL in West Virginia is set to begin in February.

With thousands of women injured by these malfunctioning mesh implants a group of plaintiffs are chosen to represent all the plaintiffs

DePuy Hip Replacement

The first DePuy Hip Replacement  trial  is scheduled to begin on Monday, January 7, 2013, in Prince George's Maryland Circuit Court. The trial is expected to last three weeks, according to court documents. (Jackson, et al. v. Chesapeake Surgical Ltd., et al., CAL 10-32147)

Judge David Katz of the U.S. District Court, District of Northern Ohio has scheduled the first bellwether trials in the DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. ASR Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation(MDL No. 2197) for May 6, 2013 and July 8, 2013.

Vaginal Mesh Lawyers Expanded Coverage Area, Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News, Medical Device Lawsuits

The wave of Vaginal mesh lawsuits is picking up as more women realize it is not in their heads. Multi District Litigation lawyers are gearing up as ther proceedings for the vaginal mesh lawsuits begin. Tne vaginal mesh has caused thousands of women pain anguish and destroyed lives and marriages.

This is a call to all women with a failed vaginal mesh to locate a doctor who understands the problem rigt away. This shaould be a urogynecologist. You will need to prove inury from the transvaginal mesh or baldder sling to file your lawsuit. Yes, we know it is from the mesh and not in your head but, a medical report needs to back you up. This is the hard part.

You must file your vaginal mesh ;awsuit if you have not done so already. The stautes in many states are running very close. We do not want you to be left out.

Alert: File Your Vaginal Mesh Lawsuit Today

Contact our 24hr hotline for victims of  the vaginal mesh