Class Action Article

  • File A Talcum Powder Lawsuit: Talcum Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Talcum Powder Fallopian Tube Cancer Lawsuits Baby  Powder Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Filed If you or a loved one used talcum powder products and were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, or fallopian tube can...

Class Action News

Drug Class Actions

  • Taxotere Lawyers for Permanent Hair Loss: Taxotere Baldness Lawyers For  Permanent Hair Loss Lawsuits Have you received Taxotere for breast cancer? Taxotere can result in hair loss or baldness  that is permanent. Taxotere  is a chemotherapy drug used for the treatment of breas...

Medical Device Lawsuits

  • Get A Hernia Mesh Lawyer | Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Filed: The hernia mesh lawyers of Class Action Lawyer Network are filing hernia mesh lawsuits for victims of a failed hernia mesh. We have Ethicon, Bard and Cook hernia mesh lawyers. Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Filed  For: Ethicon: Physiomesh Pro...

Posts Tagged ‘West palm beach Actos lawyer’

Florida Actos Lawyers

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Actos Lawsuit Lawyers

Did you take actos for 1 year or longer? Were you diagnosed with bladder cancer?

You may have a lawsuit against the manufacturers of Actos.

Actos is a medication taken by Type II  ( adult onset ) diabetics to control their insulin production. Actos lawsuits are being filed for victims of bladder cancer from Actos.

Actos Lawsuit Overview

Actos lawsuits  allege  that long-term use of this  Type 2 diabetes drug caused patients to develop bladder cancer . These continue to move forward in a multidistrict litigation underway in U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana. According to court documents, the proceeding’s next Case Management Conference will be held on Thursday, October 24, 2013, at 10:30 a.m. (In re: Actos Product Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2299)

Actos Multi District Litigation

According to court documents Actos litigation involving bladder cancer lawsuits mounted up shortly after the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) warned in June 2011 that use of the drug for 12 months or more had been associated with an increased risk of the disease. At that time, the FDA ordered Takeda Pharmaceuticals to add new warnings to the Actos label about its potential to cause bladder cancer.
Court filings indicate that more than 2,500 Actos lawsuits are now pending in the Western District of Louisiana, where the first case will go to trial in January. Plaintiffs in Actos lawsuits allege that Takeda Pharmaceuticals and other defendants concealed knowledge that the medication could increase a person’s chances of developing bladder cancer, and failed to provide adequate warnings about that risk to the public and medical community.
On the state level, two Actos claims involving bladder cancer allegations have already gone to trial. Last month, a Maryland State Court jury awarded $1.7 million to the family of a man who died of bladder cancer following long-term use of Actos. However, according to court records, the judge presiding over the trial tossed out the verdict because the jury also found that the decedent’s decades-long smoking habit contributed to the development of the disease. (An v. Nieberlein, 24-C12003565, Circuit Court for the City of Baltimore, State of Maryland.)
This past April, a Los Angeles Superior Court jury awarded $6.5 million to a plaintiff who developed bladder cancer following four years of Actos use. However, the plaintiff is currently appealing a decision by the judge overseeing the case to grant Takeda Pharmaceuticals’ request to set aside the verdict. (Cooper v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc., CGC-12-518535, California Superior Court)
Long-term users of Actos ( over 2 years ) who have been diagnosed with bladder cancer may be eligible to file an Actos lawsuit against Takeda Pharmaceuticals.

Can I File An Actos Lawsuit?

1. You must have taken Actos for over one year

2. You must have a confirmed diagnosis of bladder cancer

3. You must have no prior medical history of baldder cancer prior to taking Actos

I Have Heard Actos Can Cause Bladder Cancer? Is That True? How Do I File An Actos Lawsuit

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Actos Lawsuit Lawyers, Drug Warnings

Actos does have warnings for bladder cancer with use for extended periods of time. Actos lawyers are filing lawsuits for people who have developed bladder cancer as a part of a multi district litigation.

FDA Warnings For Actos and Bladder Cancer

FDA Drug Safety Communication: Update to ongoing safety review of Actos (pioglitazone) and increased risk of bladder cancer

Actos Bladder Cancer Safety Announcement

[6-15-2011] The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is informing the public that use of the diabetes medication Actos (pioglitazone) for more than one year may be associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer. Information about this risk will be added to the Warnings and Precautions section of the label for pioglitazone-containing medicines.

Actos Bladder Cancer Lawsuit

Actos lawsuits are being  filed on behalf of type II diabetics who developed bladder cancer from long-term use of the  drug Actos. These lawsuits continue to move forward in a multidistrict litigation in U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana. More than 2,500 Actos bladder cancer lawsuits are currently pending in the Western District of Louisiana, where the first trials are scheduled to begin in January.

Actos Product Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2299

If you believe you, a loved one or someone you are a caregiver for has gotten bladder cancer and has been on Actos call and speak to an Actos lawyer today. There must be a confirmed diagnosis of bladder cancer to be added to the lawsuit.

Female Class Action Lawsuit Lawyers For Women

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Actos Lawsuit Lawyers, Alabama Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Alaska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arizona Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Arkansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, California Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Class Action Articles, Colorado Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Connecticut Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Delaware Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Florida Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Georgia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, GranuFlo Dialysis Medication Lawyers, Hawaii Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Idaho Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Illinois Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Indiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Iowa Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kansas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Kentucky Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Louisiana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maine Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Maryland Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Massachusetts Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Michigan Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Minnesota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Mirena IUD Lawyers, Mississippi Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Missouri Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Montana Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nebraska Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Nevada Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Hampshire Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Jersey Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New Mexico Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, New York Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, North Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Ohio Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oklahoma Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Oregon Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Pennsylvania Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Rhode Island Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Carolina Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, South Dakota Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Stryker Hip replacement recall lawyer, Stryker Rejuvinate, Stryker Rejuvinate Hip replacement recall lawyers, Tennessee Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Texas Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Toxic Substances, Tylenol Liver Damage Lawsuits, Utah Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Vermont Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington DC Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Washington Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, West Virginia Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wisconsin Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers, Wyoming Multidistrict Litigation Lawyers

It has become apparent that there is a large number of drugs and devices class actions that have been filed against manyfacturers that have targeted women.

We can start with the Dow Corning  siicone  breast implant class action of years ago.  Women are still suffering today. The Dow Corning Trust just recently launched a silicone breast implant explant program.  The leaking silicone and bursting implants  lead to toxicity related immune system diseases like lupus and fibromylagia and other immune deficiency diseases. Women to this date are still suffering from their Dow silicone Breast Implants and the Dow Corning settlement trust is stll living out payments like the new breast explant program.

          Fosamax was supposed to cure osteoporosis but ended up  causing femur fractures.Then we have Yaz and Yasmine birth control pills. Young women were having their lives  altered by pre-mature strokes, pulmonary embolisms, deep vein thrombosis, blood clots  and heart attacks.  Many girls harmed were  barely starting a college life.

       History moves along to the metal on metal and metal componednt hip replacements like the  DePuy Pinnacle and ASR Hip Replacement and the Stryker Rejuvinate and ABG II Modular Stems. These are  a metal on metal hip replacement recalled for their  need for revision surgery. These hip replacements failed  in women more then men. The  smaller frame of a women makes the device more prone to problems in the female structure.

NuvaRing Lawsuits

NuvRing has been another disaster for women causing:

    blood clots in women
    cerebral thrombosis in women
    deep vein thrombosis
    heart attack in women
    pulmonary embolism
    retinal thrombosis in women
    stroke or cerebral hemorrhage
    thrombophlebitis and venous thrombosis with or without embolism
    toxic shock syndrome

Fosamax Lawsuits

Fosamax for osteoporosis actually causes what it is prescribed to fix , femur fractures.

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

   The biggest and most horrific is the  the various vaginal mesh devices for urinary incontinence and uterine, bladder and bowel prolapse. This mesh device is made of a Prolene plastic synthetic fiber that has been falling aprt in women. Thousands of  women across the country are screaming the horrors of the vaginal mesh and lawsuits are being filed in droves. Women are in severe pain described  as razor blades. The mesh  has been reported by female victims to be  eroding thru the vaginal wall and at times into the bladder and bowel.  Women can no longer have sexual intercourse and marriages are falling apart. Women are losing their jobs and cannot work.  And then we have  the Mirena IUD which has been gravitating our of postion and ending up embedded in the uterus or a nearby organ.

Lives are being ruined and justice must be sought. Lawsuits are the only thing these manufacturers understand.

 

FDA Quick Review Process, Dangerous Drugs And Devices Pushed Thru On The Fast Track

Written by lisaspitzer on . Posted in Class MDL Class Action News

Class Action lawyers Filing lawsuits for vaginal mesh, Bladder sling, Stryker Hip replacements and other Hip replacements, GranuFlo, Actos, Pradaxa, Mirena IUD, and many others. Many devices harming victims were pushed thru on the FDA fast track process.

Medical Devices and the Public’s Health: The FDA 510(k) Clearance Process at 35 Years

Released:
    July 29, 2011
Type:
    Consensus Report
Topics:
    Public Health, Quality and Patient Safety
Activity:
    Public Health Effectiveness of the FDA 510(k) Clearance Process
Board:
    Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice

Medical devices play a critical role in the health care of Americans. They can range from simple tools, such as tongue depressors and bandages, to complex or life-saving equipment, such as pacemakers, magnetic resonance imaging machines, and heart–lung machines. The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) requires a "reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness" before a device can be marketed, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is responsible for enforcing this requirement. Devices that are deemed to have a moderate risk to patients generally cannot go on the market until they are cleared through the 510(k) process, named for Section 510(k) of the FFDCA.  Some policymakers and patients have expressed concern about the ability of the 510(k) process to ensure that medical devices on the market are safe and effective. Other policymakers and patients, as well as the medical-device industry, have asserted that the process has become too burdensome and time-consuming and that it is delaying important new medical devices from entering the market.

The FDA turned to the IOM to review the 510(k) process and answer two questions:

    Does the current 510(k) process protect patients optimally and promote innovation in support of public health?
    If not, what legislative, regulatory, or administrative changes are recommended to achieve the goals of the 510(k) process optimally

The IOM finds that the current 510(k) process is flawed based on its legislative foundation. Rather than continuing to modify the 35-year-old 510(k) process, the IOM concludes that the FDA’s finite resources would be better invested in developing an integrated premarket and postmarket regulatory framework that provides a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness throughout the device life cycle. The IOM outlines its criteria for this framework in the report.